Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Quick1

Isn't thirteen years long enough for a common law marriage?


2 posted on 02/23/2006 1:55:20 PM PST by Eepsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Eepsy

In Arkansas, they're probably considered cousins.


7 posted on 02/23/2006 1:57:18 PM PST by My2Cents ("The essence of American journalism is vulgarity divested of truth." -- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Eepsy

People misunderstand common law marriage. Statutory law has replaced common law in most areas of the law. Nowadaws, the individual state has to recognize such marriages; Missouri does not. No matter what this couple does to 'hold themselves out' to the community as a couple, they cannot be legally recognized as married.

A bunch of kids and 13 years, why don't they go down to the Justice of the Peace already?


28 posted on 02/23/2006 2:06:53 PM PST by radiohead (Hey Kerry, I'm still here; still hating your lying, stinking guts, you coward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Eepsy

I don't think Missouri has common law marriage.


29 posted on 02/23/2006 2:07:10 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Eepsy

Common law marriages are not so common... they also have specific rules:
http://www.unmarried.org/common.html


126 posted on 02/23/2006 2:51:19 PM PST by Kirkwood ("When the s*** hits the fan, there is enough for everyone.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Eepsy

1 second is long enough for a common law marriage, one merely needs to cohabitate and "hold yourself out" as husband and wife. (That is, file taxes together, tell firends you are married, etc.)


148 posted on 02/23/2006 3:10:02 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Eepsy

Only a few states recognize "common law marriage." It's generally not a moral issue, but a legal one, as is the objection here. Due to all the property disputable issues (if the break up) couples living together unmarried are a legal nightmare for the state...


206 posted on 02/23/2006 6:23:58 PM PST by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Eepsy
Common law marriage is largely a thing of myth. 15 states currently recognize limited common law marriages, of those 4 only recognize common law marriages that have been grandfathered in while no new ones are created, 1 only recognizes them for inheritence purposes.

Of the remaining states the requirements are so akin to marriage that it isn't even funny. In Texas, in order to be recognized as a common law marriage you must: must sign a form provided by the county clerk. In addition, they must (1) agree to be married, (2) cohabit, and (3) represent to others that they are married.

215 posted on 02/23/2006 9:10:30 PM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Eepsy

Doesn't that violate HUD Fair Housing regluations??


216 posted on 02/23/2006 9:58:51 PM PST by Schwaeky ("Truth is not determined by a majority vote." Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson