Skip to comments.
Fitzgerald Refuses to Show Evidence That Valerie Wilson Was Classified (NO Fitzmas For The Left)
National Review Online ^
| February 23, 2006
| Byron York
Posted on 02/23/2006 7:56:53 AM PST by PJ-Comix
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
To: atlaw
41
posted on
02/23/2006 8:39:18 AM PST
by
Coop
(FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
To: Homer1
It doesn't always have to be material to the investigation as long as it extended from the investigation but it does have to be material to what is in the indictment. You're exactly right, there is and has never been a case here just a he said, she said indictment.
42
posted on
02/23/2006 8:42:20 AM PST
by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
To: Coop
Thanks, Coop. Libby's team makes a strong case here, and if the prosecution can't provide the evidence this case will be thrown out.
43
posted on
02/23/2006 8:49:47 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
Well, I'm hedging my bets until I find out who appointed the judge. :-}
44
posted on
02/23/2006 8:51:31 AM PST
by
Coop
(FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
To: PJ-Comix
Here's a link to the DOJ indictment. It says specifically that Valerie Wilson's employment status with the CIA was classified.
Luckily I'm not a lawyer because to me this looks like every day in the Clinton administration.
Based on the charges against Libby, I don't understand why Judith Miller and Tim Russert weren't prosecuted as well. They could just as easily be assumed to be lying as well as Libby.
To: PJ-Comix
Apparently as Grandma would say "the sh*t is starting to fall apart" Really hard to make a case when you forgot to ask for evidence of a crime. But he sure gives a good press conference.
46
posted on
02/23/2006 8:52:30 AM PST
by
newcthem
(Use Allah urinal cakes!)
To: Howlin
47
posted on
02/23/2006 8:53:14 AM PST
by
maggief
(and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
To: Mo1
Scooter ain't being charged with outing Valerie.
He's charged with lying about it under oath.
The fact that Valerie may or may not have been outed, because she may, or may not have been a secret spy girl, really ain't got too much to do with this. Neither does the fact that her sleazoid bed partner may, or may not have, outed her long before Scooter may, or may not have.
Scooter's defense team would very much like to make these points part of the case. If they succeed, pay'em double!
48
posted on
02/23/2006 8:54:32 AM PST
by
Kenny Bunk
(Accurate observation is necessary, but does not necessarily include agreement.)
To: PJ-Comix
PJ, there has got to be DUFU thread in the works over this. Some of them are either going to go on meds or be so freaked out they'll forget to take their meds.
To: Mo1; Howlin; PJ-Comix; Coop
Pingo and one more teentsie point:
Scooter (rather dumbly IMHO) walked into what's known as a "Perjury Trap." And a rather neatly laid snare it was!
50
posted on
02/23/2006 8:57:52 AM PST
by
Kenny Bunk
(Accurate observation is necessary, but does not necessarily include agreement.)
To: K4Harty
I'll check but recently there has been VERY LITTLE discussion of Fitzmas over in DUmmieland.
51
posted on
02/23/2006 8:59:29 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
(Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
To: Kenny Bunk
You're right, he wasn't charged with outing her but it was indicated in the indictment the Libby was the first to talk to reporters about her "classified" status and Libby fibbed about it. If Fitzy can't support what HE put in the indictment then the indictment should be tossed regardless what Libby did or didn't do. If Fitzy still feels he has a case after the indictment is tossed then he can resubmit an indictment.
52
posted on
02/23/2006 9:07:37 AM PST
by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
To: Just mythoughts
An excellent point ands one that has trouble me from the beginning. Who at the CIA was involved in launching this probe? Why have their names been so invisible? What is Goss actually doing to clean house?
53
posted on
02/23/2006 9:08:21 AM PST
by
bjc
(Check the data!!)
To: PJ-Comix
Fitz has NO credibility left. Lawyers at a friends office were laughing at his ineptness this morning!
LLS
54
posted on
02/23/2006 9:11:31 AM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
To: bjc
Well all this started before Goss came on board and doubtful that he has been asked anything about this from Fitzer.
Once that ball got rolling it evolved into a life form.
For all we know Val gal could have sent the referral herself.
To: PJ-Comix
Fitzgerald is stonewalling. He needs to be seen as stonewalling.
56
posted on
02/23/2006 9:17:56 AM PST
by
MarxSux
To: PJ-Comix
Something about it being impossible to prove a negative?
57
posted on
02/23/2006 9:20:19 AM PST
by
cgk
(I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
To: Howlin; PJ-Comix
To: Just mythoughts
59
posted on
02/23/2006 9:55:11 AM PST
by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author:)
To: STARWISE
60
posted on
02/23/2006 9:55:46 AM PST
by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author:)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson