Skip to comments.
Fitzgerald Refuses to Show Evidence That Valerie Wilson Was Classified (NO Fitzmas For The Left)
National Review Online ^
| February 23, 2006
| Byron York
Posted on 02/23/2006 7:56:53 AM PST by PJ-Comix
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
It looks like the Left WON'T be having a Merry Fitzmas.
1
posted on
02/23/2006 7:56:56 AM PST
by
PJ-Comix
To: PJ-Comix
He can't show what doesn't exist.............
2
posted on
02/23/2006 7:59:03 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him...)
To: PJ-Comix
Ha! Ha! Another lump of coal for the DUmmies!
3
posted on
02/23/2006 7:59:52 AM PST
by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: PJ-Comix
i-i'll have a blu-u-ue Fitzmas.....without youuuuuu....
4
posted on
02/23/2006 8:00:18 AM PST
by
NRA1995
(If feminists are so smart, why do they need masturbation workshops?)
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: Howlin
6
posted on
02/23/2006 8:00:40 AM PST
by
Peach
To: PJ-Comix
Can Libby sue for Prosecutorial abuse?
To: PJ-Comix
For some legal beagle type, but if your car is searched and the cop did not have reasonable grounds to think you had committed a crime, wouldn't the evidence be tossed out? And would the same legal reasoning be in play here? If there was no crime in the first place, how could any fruit of the poison tree be used to convict someone?
8
posted on
02/23/2006 8:04:42 AM PST
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news)
To: LS
Using your comparison.
What if you punched out the police while he was searching your car.
You'd probably still be arrested for the crime.
That's what they will use. Even if their investigation wasn't based on fact, they want to show that Libby lied to the investigators.
I think it is entrapment, myself.
9
posted on
02/23/2006 8:09:37 AM PST
by
i_dont_chat
(I defend the right to offend!)
To: Dog Gone; atlaw
For some reading on another topic I thought you might find interesting. :-)
10
posted on
02/23/2006 8:10:06 AM PST
by
Coop
(FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
To: PJ-Comix
There used to be a show called"In Living Color" They did a Homey the Clown skit where Homey had this sock that he beat kids over the head with.
It seems obvious Homey beat Fitz a little too hard.
To: PJ-Comix
Ummmm.hey Fitzi baby, you don't get it do you? You have to show cause, not just conjecture here. You don't get it both ways either. If the premise of your indictment is Valerie's secret cover, then PROVE that Libby busted it. If not, can the indictment and save us taxpayers some dough. ( I thought this guy was supposed to be really smart!)
12
posted on
02/23/2006 8:10:23 AM PST
by
geezerwheezer
(get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
To: LS
If there was no crime in the first place, how could any fruit of the poison tree be used to convict someone? A good question that I assume is the point of the Defense asking for the disclosures. Seems like Libby has hired good defense attorney's and it seems that Fitzgerald is going to look like a bumbling idiot by the time this is over.
To: i_dont_chat
Ok, thanks for the clarification.
14
posted on
02/23/2006 8:10:34 AM PST
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news)
To: PJ-Comix
Extremely difficult to prove a negative, "I did not beat my wife, in fact, I do not have to prove that I did not beat a wife, as I have no wife."
15
posted on
02/23/2006 8:12:58 AM PST
by
zerosix
(Native Sunflower and avid ironer)
To: PJ-Comix
Fitzy brought it up in order to influence a potential jury so why the problem now?
16
posted on
02/23/2006 8:13:16 AM PST
by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
To: 69ConvertibleFirebird; 76834; alarm rider; alisasny; andysandmikesmom; april15Bendovr; ...
Scooter ping!
17
posted on
02/23/2006 8:14:21 AM PST
by
Howlin
("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
To: i_dont_chat
What if you punched out the police while he was searching your car. You'd probably still be arrested for the crime. But if there was no crime, the purgery is not material to any case. Punching an officer is a crime in itself. Purgery usually must be material to a case to be a crime.
To: Howlin
This is going to be fun to watch!
19
posted on
02/23/2006 8:16:42 AM PST
by
hipaatwo
To: geezerwheezer
"I thought this guy was supposed to be really smart!"
Nope, apparently he's NOT the brightest bulb on the tree. Fitz is trying to push a political agenda under the guise of illegal actions before a grand jury.
Libby's legal team is gonna chew on him until he screams. Fitz knows he has a very lame case and he is trying to smokescreen everyone.
20
posted on
02/23/2006 8:17:21 AM PST
by
el_texicano
(Liberals, Socialist, DemocRATS, all touchy, feely, mind numbed robots, useless idiots all)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson