Skip to comments.
'Bush Was Right'(Saddam's WMD)
Investor's Business Daily ^
| 2/21/2006
| staff
Posted on 02/21/2006 5:38:24 PM PST by kellynla
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-155 next last
1
posted on
02/21/2006 5:38:25 PM PST
by
kellynla
To: kellynla
THIS is what we should be talking about instead of Cheney and ports.
2
posted on
02/21/2006 5:40:49 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(atheist)
To: kellynla
3
posted on
02/21/2006 5:42:06 PM PST
by
cgk
(I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
To: Darkwolf377
Everyone is in too much of a lather to even notice.
4
posted on
02/21/2006 5:42:49 PM PST
by
digger48
To: kellynla
The Media is about to become silent on the issue of WMD.
5
posted on
02/21/2006 5:43:04 PM PST
by
ardara
To: kellynla
Guess the Libs and the Media don't want to face the fact they may have to
"Eat Crow"
6
posted on
02/21/2006 5:43:20 PM PST
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: kellynla
MSM .... CHIRP CHIRP (sounds of crickets)
7
posted on
02/21/2006 5:43:31 PM PST
by
Delmarksman
(Pro 2A Anglican American (Ford and Chevy kill more people than guns do, lets ban them))
To: digger48
True enough. Every single thread is about the port issue, ignoring the mounting evidence about the war.
The MSM and DNC couldn't have made this happen any better if they planned it.
8
posted on
02/21/2006 5:44:27 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(atheist)
To: kellynla
Haven't you heard, Bill Tierney is a Jesus freak. The tapes are not to be believed!
To: kellynla
Okay look, I don't deny that there's a generic media bias against anything that would make Bush look good, but this is such a gigantic story that is so muffled, even among many conservative sites. (Even here, it gets only moderate play.)
There's got to be more to it than mere media bias. What is it?
10
posted on
02/21/2006 5:45:57 PM PST
by
Democracy In Iraq
(When a soldier dies, a protester gloats, a family cries, an Iraqi votes)
To: kellynla
On one of the tapes, made in 2000, two years after Saddam kicked out U.N. weapons inspectors, two Iraqi scientists can be heard briefing Hussein on their progress in enriching uranium using plasma separation. If successful, their work would have given Saddam the fissile material he needed to make a nuclear bomb.
To: kellynla
Any members of Congress, who were aware of this proof of WMDs yet actively opposed the Iraq war, are guilty of treason. Indict.
12
posted on
02/21/2006 5:48:07 PM PST
by
reasonisfaith
(It's a safe bet to oppose Clinton on any given issue)
To: Darkwolf377
Call me crazy, but I think the port issue deserves higher coverage. The port issue is about security threats to come. The WMD issue is already settled, whether to our satisfaction or not. Iraq won't be getting WMDs. If our ports are secured by Arabs, the ports might be used as entry for WMDs.
I still think that the port of Houston or one near it in Texas will be the next terrorist target.
13
posted on
02/21/2006 5:49:13 PM PST
by
LibertarianInExile
(Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
To: Darkwolf377
THIS is what we should be talking about instead of Cheney and ports.""
The operation of our ports is a correct topic for FR, I think. As for Cheney:
Who is making t-shirts that say:
I WOULD RATHER GO HUNTING WITH DICK CHENEY THAN DRIVING WITH TED KENNEDY!!! ??
I WOULD LIKE ONE IF THERE IS SUCH A THING. CONTACT ME DIRECTLY, PLEASE.
To: Democracy In Iraq
Because if the news was actually reported Bush's poll numbers might go into the eighties.
15
posted on
02/21/2006 5:50:01 PM PST
by
MarkeyD
(Make Love, Not Cartoons. I really, really loathe liberals.)
To: digger48
Everyone is in too much of a lather to even notice. This story was posted here many times well before the ports story became hot, and it got a lot of attention. Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, the MSM completely ignored it.
16
posted on
02/21/2006 5:50:10 PM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: Darkwolf377
I wouldn't say every thread. This topic is being followed too, although I have to say that far too many Freepers joined the MSM "no WMD" chorus and continue to doubt that there were any. This, despite all the evidence before, during, and after we invaded Iraq.
17
posted on
02/21/2006 5:51:11 PM PST
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: operation clinton cleanup
Haven't you heard, Bill Tierney is a Jesus freak. The tapes are not to be believed!
If your comment was meant to be sarcastic or not I have a feeling that Bill Tierney being religious will be all the justification needed for the MSM to kill the story.
18
posted on
02/21/2006 5:51:36 PM PST
by
crazyhorse691
(Diplomacy doesn't work when seagulls rain on your parade. A shotgun and umbrella does.)
To: Darkwolf377
Too late now. They could find a billion tons of WMD stockpiled somewhere in Iraq and it wouldn't matter. The port story is undoing all that has been done to fight this war in the minds of many on both sides of the political aisle. Whoever took Karl Rove...ha ha...very funny...PUT HIM BACK NOW!
:-) JEDI.
Someone in the White House screwed this up....BIG TIME....
19
posted on
02/21/2006 5:52:23 PM PST
by
JediForce
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
To: LibertarianInExile
The next terrorist target is any upcoming U.S. election. And their strategy is to get democrats elected.
20
posted on
02/21/2006 5:52:54 PM PST
by
reasonisfaith
(It's a safe bet to oppose Clinton on any given issue)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-155 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson