Posted on 02/21/2006 12:15:43 PM PST by Sopater
Federalizing charity hasn't shown to be a deterrent to scammers. And it isn't Constitutional either.
sad
If it were funded on a voluntary donation basis, I don't think it would be unconstitutional. Government can appropriately act as a facilitator of activities that individual citizens want to engage in.
He has my prayers. As does his family. I wonder if the doctors could use maggots ( yep maggots) to get rid of the dead flesh and the bacteria it holds. Maggot therapy is used in cases of gangrene.
God bless this little boy and keep him from further harm.
"Government can appropriately act as a facilitator . . . "
Where does the Constitution empower the federal government to do that?
I was thinking about using DMSO mixed with some antibacterial chemical and applying it to the affected tissue.
DMSO goes right through the cell walls and will transport whatever chemical is mixed with it.
I saw a man of TV that had been sewn up with a stainless steel protractor inside him. He developed the bacterial infection. The Drs. had to leave his stomach open and pack his insides with clorox soaked gauze for weeks to kill the infection.
He lost most of the abdominal wall in the process.
Section 8, general welfare clause. Just because that clause has been abused to justify all manner of abominable wealth-confiscation-and-redistribution schemes, doesn't mean that the clause is no longer a real part of the Constitution. I don't regard it as an abuse for the federal government to facilitate voluntary donation programs, for a charitable purpose which has proven very difficult for the private sector (and state governments) to handle efficiently and effectively.
Hyperbaric Oxygen is effective for killing flesh-eating bacteria. It is suspicious that they don't take him to Virginia Mason for treatments. If anyone can contact the parents, they should be made aware that HBOT is an accepted medical protocol for these types of infection.
Prayers from TX
DMSO will not ntransport any chemical which is "mixed" with it, and will not necessarily transport any chemical which is attached to it. Depends on the molecular size of the chemical, and on its effects on both DMSO and on cell mechanisms which selectively allow certain substances to enter. DMSO is mighty weird stuff though -- rub it on your leg and soon you'll taste it in your mouth.
I was wondering the same thing.
God Bless Jake and his family and doctors.
These flesh eating bacteria usually move pretty swiftly and I hope that the surgeries, however much follow-on plastic surger is required, can get rid of the bacteria. His having survived this long is a good sign (strange as that may sound).
Who pays for the manpower that goes into administering such a fund? I suspect that my taxes will. What if more federal employees are hired to administer the fund? Would that not feed Leviathan?
Back to the real issue here, may God bless that little boy and his family.
Even pro football players aren't immune:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/26/AR2006012602171.html
That's encouaging. I wasn't sure if children's had hyperbaric facilities.
Prayers for Jake.
DMSO should not be used on open wounds. It is best used for such problems as sore joints, swollen areas and other closed injuries. I have used it on my horse and am familiar with its properties. My husband used it recently for his wrist. Funny that FDA will not approve it but that it has been approved by several European countries.
I will say a Divine Mercy chaplet for Jake. God keep him and his family.
Prayers for little Jake Finkbonner.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.