Skip to comments.
Your Computer Is Under Attack---LOL
New York Times ^
| Feb. 20, 2006
| Alex Mindlin
Posted on 02/20/2006 2:35:39 PM PST by firebrand
142---Number of unique I.M. viruses in 2004
2,403---number of unique I.M. viruses in 2005
The number of viruses transmitted through instant-messaging software surged in the last year. . . .
Such viruses typically arrive in innocuous-looking messages, ostensibly from an I.M. buddy, [urging] the recipient to download software that turns out to be malicious.
[E]-mail inboxes are increasingly well protected against viruses, forcing hackers to look at other modes of transmission. . . .
Another innovation last year was the first talking I.M. virus, which chatted with its targets. . . . [O]ne of its favorite phrases was "lol that's cool."
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Technical
KEYWORDS: computersecurity; malware; spyware; viruses
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
02/20/2006 2:35:40 PM PST
by
firebrand
To: firebrand
I use Red Hat's Fedora desktop OS with almost everything, e.g., M$ Office equivalent, Limewire, etc. I don't worry anymore.
2
posted on
02/20/2006 2:47:43 PM PST
by
hamboy
To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...
3
posted on
02/20/2006 2:48:05 PM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: firebrand
4
posted on
02/20/2006 2:50:50 PM PST
by
HOTTIEBOY
(The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
To: hamboy
You're protected by AngelFire??
5
posted on
02/20/2006 2:53:43 PM PST
by
Egon
(We are number one! All others are number two... or lower.)
To: hamboy
Limewire At least you feel like you can steal in relative safety.
6
posted on
02/20/2006 2:54:30 PM PST
by
Doohickey
(If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice...I will choose freewill.)
To: HOTTIEBOY
Well, of course. I don't buy it. I read it to keep my blood pressure from getting too low.
7
posted on
02/20/2006 3:01:25 PM PST
by
firebrand
To: firebrand
These things are annoying, and easy to fall for. You'll get an IM from someone on your buddy list with a message like, "Hey, man, check out
these pics I took of us." The link will be to a file named something like "img00213.jpg.com", which of course will usually display as just img00213.jpg on a lot of systems. So you innocently click your friend's link, and you're infected. "You" (rather, your screen name) then sends that same text message with the malware to everyone on your buddy list, which is how it propagates.
I use a product from Zone Labs (maker of the popular ZoneAlarm firewall, which I also use) called
IMSecure. The free version is fairly limited, but it will encrypt conversations (if both parties have the software) and automatically filter out links. This filtration is cruder than the pay version, which I understand will actively determine whether a link is malicious, but as kind of an experiment I avoid paying anything for my security. If someone wants me to turn off that option and send me a link, they have to tell me in advance, so I know it's legit.
8
posted on
02/20/2006 3:03:35 PM PST
by
Turbopilot
(Nothing in the above post is or should be construed as legal research, analysis, or advice.)
To: Turbopilot
The link will be to a file named something like "img00213.jpg.com", which of course will usually display as just img00213.jpg on a lot of systems.You'd think that by now MS-Windows would display the complete file name. They are eventually going to have to do something about allowing files to execute based on extension name too. That's just asking for trouble.
9
posted on
02/20/2006 3:13:17 PM PST
by
zeugma
(This post made with the 'Xinha Here!' Firefox plugin.)
To: Turbopilot
These things are annoying, and easy to fall for. two words:
gaim
kopete
10
posted on
02/20/2006 3:13:51 PM PST
by
When_Penguins_Attack
(Smashing Windows, Breaking down Gates. Proud Mepis User!!!!)
To: When_Penguins_Attack
i was thinking the same thing, a .com file wouldn't work with gaim would it?
for you non techs out there .com is also a program file like .exe. it is old school dos crap and would still works on XP.
hint:under tools in explorer you can turn off "hide know extensions" to see what files really are.
11
posted on
02/20/2006 3:29:10 PM PST
by
postaldave
(democrats=traitorous b*st*rds)
To: firebrand
Big new threat is Google Desktop 3 -- anyone not familiar with its operation should 'read before buying.' It can expose all your files to the world.
12
posted on
02/20/2006 3:32:24 PM PST
by
Ed_in_NJ
(Who killed Suzanne Coleman?)
To: Turbopilot
13
posted on
02/20/2006 3:32:39 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
("If you're going to shoot somebody, Shoot! Don't talk!")
To: zeugma
You can actually configure your computer to do that. Go to "My Computer" and click on "Folder Options." From there, look for "Hidden Files and Folders." Unclick the option "Hide extensions for known file types." Personally, I can't imagine why anyone would want to hide that kind of information.
14
posted on
02/20/2006 3:37:45 PM PST
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: zeugma
Well, it is an option that can be set or unset in Windows, although it defaults to not displaying extensions for known file types. I have it unset on my computer, and I'm not actually sure what the point of hiding the extensions is.
I should have been a little more clear; in this case it's a simple matter of HTML. Typing "<a href="http://www.badwebsite.com/virus.com>http://www.safepicturewebsite.com/img01234.jpg</a>" will display
http://www.safepicturewebsite.com/img01234.jpg but clicking on it will actually run virus.com from http://www.badwebsite.com. Unless you think to right-click on the link and look at its properties, you don't know you're clicking on a malicious link.
15
posted on
02/20/2006 3:38:27 PM PST
by
Turbopilot
(Nothing in the above post is or should be construed as legal research, analysis, or advice.)
To: When_Penguins_Attack
I first thought you were insulting me in a foreign language :-p
It looks like both those products are written for Linux. Is there a similar "generic" AIM client for XP that has higher protection levels?
16
posted on
02/20/2006 3:39:30 PM PST
by
Turbopilot
(Nothing in the above post is or should be construed as legal research, analysis, or advice.)
To: Turbopilot
GAIM also exists for Windows. i use it when i'm on Windows XP. (not much these days).
17
posted on
02/20/2006 3:57:58 PM PST
by
Calvinist_Dark_Lord
(I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper)
To: Egon
Angelfire, lol. I was just gonna put the animated dancing pengiun.
18
posted on
02/20/2006 4:40:00 PM PST
by
hamboy
To: MizSterious
Ya. I'm aware of that. It's the first thing I do when someone suckers me into doing something with their windows computer. One would think by now that one of those monthly defect fixes Microsoft releases would set this to be default behavior. I mean, we know that it is a serious problem, and sets people up to do stupid things. Why not have it safe by default, rather than the opposite. Oh, yeah. I forgot I was talking about Microsoft for a moment. Never mind.
19
posted on
02/20/2006 4:54:15 PM PST
by
zeugma
(This post made with the 'Xinha Here!' Firefox plugin.)
To: Turbopilot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson