Posted on 02/18/2006 4:34:05 PM PST by Clintonfatigued
Writing in Roll Call, Stuart Rothenberg gives us his top ten list of most endangered House incumbents. All but one are Republicans.
Rep. Bob Ney (R-OH) Rep. Tom DeLay (R-TX) Rep. John Hostettler (R-IN) Rep. Jim Gerlach (R-PA) Rep. Rob Simmons (R-CT) Rep. Heather Wilson (R-NM) Rep. Christopher Shays (R-CT) Rep. Mike Sodrel (R-IN) Rep. Clay Shaw (R-FL) Rep. Melissa Bean (D-IL)
He says it was a tough list to compile. "Many of the incumbents on this list have proven their political mettle before, and in normal circumstances, they wouldnt be in all that much trouble. Others find themselves in the sort of hot water that should automatically sink them, but because of unique circumstances, they might somehow survive."
(Excerpt) Read more at politicalwire.com ...
I wonder if Rothenberg took into account the fact that both the Barrow and Marshall districts were redrawn to undo the Democrat gerrymander, or the likelihood that there will be a landslide for the GOP ticket, which bolsters both Burns & Collins. Under the current lines, obviously both incumbents would be favored.
FWIW, these are my personal rankings of Democratic-held seats.
Toss Up
1 (IL-08) Bean
2 (GA-08) Marshall
Lean Democratic
3 (OH-06) Strickland*
4 (TX-17) Edwards
5 (VT-AL) Sanders (I)*
Likely Democratic
6 (GA-12) Barrow
7 (IA-03) Boswell
8 (LA-03) Melancon
9 (UT-02) Matheson
10 (KS-03) Moore
11 (SC-05) Spratt
12 (CO-03) Salazar
Watch List
13 (WA-02) Larsen
14 (ND-AL) Pomeroy
15 (NY-27) Higgins
16 (HI-02) Case*
17 (AR-02) Snyder**
The open Strickland seat would move to Toss Up or Lean GOP depending on the outcome of the ballot qualification issue.
Snyder is on the list (with two asterisks) because he's reporting $0 raised as of Dec 31, which suggests potential retirement. If Snyder retires, I'd probably move the seat to Toss Up. If he does not, I dunno. It depends on when he decides it costs money to run a campaign, even for an entrenched incumbent. LOL
There's no denying that the 'Rats have benefitted from the costly mistakes of the GOP on L.I. Had Felix Grucci not flamed out in his reelection, he'd still be holding the 1st. The embarrassment of the race in '00 to get a decent successor to Lazio, and the subsequent multi-candidate split in the general enabled Israel's rise. The GOP's problem with the 4th and not fully-funding any challenger to McCarthy is outrageous. If Peter King retires, I worry the GOP similarly screws up with getting a successor.
I also share your frustration with Washington state. What happened to that tidal-wave of sanity that gripped the state in '94 ?
The candidate likely to win the Dem primary is former congressman Nick Lampson; a bigger crook than DeLay could ever be!
I'd move Melancon (LA-3) up towards the front. Craig Romero is as strong a challenger as he can face. I'd put him ahead of Barrow and definitely a toss-up (again, I need to see Romero's fundraising). I have to admit I detest making these prognostications in the absence of seeing fundraising figures. It's the difference as to try to ascertain whether a challenger/candidate LOOKS good on the surface vs. whether they are viable. BIG difference.
Long past time for him to go. I had dealings with this joker back in the early 80s when he was just in the state house. He had voted for some bill that enabled schools in his district to buy computers from my employer.
He then came to the door of our computer store and demanded his free computer. I wish my boss had had the balls to call the SBI right then.
(FWIW, he had enough balls to refuse him his freebie.)
In LA-03, these are the figures as of Dec 31.
Melancon raised: $989,032
Romero raised: $438,888
Melancon Cash on Hand: $880,413
Romero Cash on Hand: $345,809
That is certainly viable on the part of Romero. My own impulse was to rate LA-03 in Lean Dem, but Torie has persuaded me otherwise by pointing out that Louisiana is an extremely incumbent-friendly state, which is true.
My expectation is that the LA-03 race will trend up. I also wonder about what the Katrina effect will be down there.
I think Marshall has been doing the right PR things to hold the seat as a Blue Dog.
I'd swap Spratt for him in the Toss-up category.
Your recollection on the Georgia seats is entirely consistent with my own. We (meaning Torie & I) don't disagree on Barrow & Marshall. In fact, I'd be more inclined to move Barrow down than up, and that's how I think it'll trend.
I think Spratt will trend up the list, but before I move it I want to see more evidence that confirms that a 12-term Dem incumbent is going to be vulnerable in a Dem-favorable year.
I live in Kansas 3rd and I'm here to tell you that I've not heard of a single GOP challenger for Moore in this election. His last opponent, Kris Kobach, lost by 11 and a half points in 2004, such a horrendous margin that he can't be considered a serious challenger anymore. The moderate Republican from 2002, Adam Taff, just got sent to jail for 15 months for messing with his campaign money. Nobody is stepping up yet, nobody has been seriously mentioned, and with Moore's campaign chest time is running short. Look for Kansas Third to remain solidly in the Democrat camp.
Unless of course, Barrow is beaten in the Dem primary by a black. Then it gets more complex and iffy. Is a well financed credible black running against him?
And Barrow had to move his residence into his new district. Still, Barrow would be a narrow favorite.
Ronnie Earle is a political hack with a trophy deficient disorder.
Thanks for the link, that helps immensely. Glancing at it, I found a few surprises. Such as lackluster fundraising by Souder & Hostettler in IN. Mollohan in WV is tied with his GOP challenger, Wakim, who apparently is 2/3rds self-funding.
Spratt's challenger is matching well in fund-raising, but how he is polling is another story (which I have no idea).
Indeed, it remains a problem that in KS-3, there are effectively 3 parties, the Democrats, the regular Republicans, and the "Moderate" (liberal) Republicans. Until you can find a candidate who can appeal to both wings of the GOP (good luck there), Moore continues to benefit. You are correct Moore has raised a fortune.
Hey, good find! I've been rather vexed at the absence of comparative pre- and post- redistricting figures for the two Georgia districts.
In light of that, I think the odds of Barrow losing to Burns in what looks to be this year's political landscape are notably lower than I'd thought. Here's my new Dem-seat list. Barrow is at #10.
Toss Up
1 (IL-08) Bean
2 (GA-08) Marshall
Lean Democratic
3 (OH-06) Strickland*
4 (TX-17) Edwards
5 (VT-AL) Sanders (I)*
Likely Democratic
6 (IA-03) Boswell
7 (LA-03) Melancon
8 (UT-02) Matheson
9 (KS-03) Moore
10 (GA-12) Barrow
11 (SC-05) Spratt
12 (CO-03) Salazar
Watch List
13 (WA-02) Larsen
14 (ND-AL) Pomeroy
15 (NY-27) Higgins
16 (HI-02) Case*
17 (AR-02) Snyder**
As for the prospect of a well-financed credible black running against Barrow, no fundraising has been reported from GA-12 to the FEC by anyone except Barrow and Burns. There's been some buzz that Denise Magette might move down from Atlanta to run, for whatever that's worth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.