That should be good
Savage just said he's editing his new book to take the bad parts about Schumer...
Does anybody have a streaming radio link for Savage's show?
A raving lunatic talking to a schmuck. I'm underwhelmed.
Putzy? (I'm referring to Schumer.)
Chuck Schumer is trying to stop the sale of the six ports to UAE. Talks about the potential of planting a nuclear device at one of these ports. This is an important issue because Savage hates Chuck Schumer but Schumer is right on this one.
LOL...oh god
Ha...just what I thought. Schumer's aim (and the media's) is geared toward dividing the conservatives.
hClinton and Schumer are intro-ing a bill to stop the Bush Admin turning 6 port operations over to an UAE company.
[This issue may bite the Bush butt as hard from the left and right as the Miers nomination did from the right.]
Other talk radio (Tony Snow, Mark Levin, Sean Hannity) are still stuck on Cheney's shooting accident.
Sure was big of the Administration to hand the democrats such a useful gift. This time they may just get somewhere with it.
A pair of 40 watt bulbs.
Malkin: Stop the Port Sellout / Our Ports, Our Sovereignty (+UAE links to 9/11) |
||
Posted by cgk On 02/17/2006 11:56:33 AM CST · 57 replies · 1,258+ views MichelleMalkin.com ^ | 2-16-06 | Michelle Malkin STOP THE PORT SELLOUT By Michelle Malkin · February 16, 2006 10:10 PM ***scroll for updates*** Forget about the Cheney accidental shooting. Based on my e-mail and the growing outcry from both sides of the political aisle, this was and is the big story of the week--and it's picking up steam: [LES KINSOLVING]: The government's Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States has approved a deal that will put six major ports in the United States under the control of a state-sponsored company based in Dubai, the United Arab Emirates. And my question: Knowing, as we do, that... |
Why post a thread about something happening on the radio or TV, unless you are planning to give details?? Just start a chat session and the rest of us will know not to bother.
Guess y'all missed the very beginning of the show. "Thank GOD for Hillary Clinton!", he said. Twice. !!!!
Schmuckie - and by that I'm referring to Schumer - has sensed there's some political mileage to be gained by opposing this sale. He's a little late to the party though.
That is just for starters!
I concur with your conclusions about the real effects of the buyout. We all realize the perception of the buyout concerning national security will carry the greatest weight in this case. Logical or not, we will never convince the majority of Americans and their representatives in Congress differently.
As a member of management for a Fortune 500 petrochemical company, I had personal experience with a similar acquisition when our former USA company was purchased in the 1990s by a consortium controlled by the Kuwaitis. There was no change (or infiltration) by the Kuwaitis in operation, policies, security, or personnel; absolutely none even after ten years. Other than references to the Kuwaitis in the annual report, we never knew they existed. Many of these acquisitions by Arab interests are simply financial vehicles to invest their oil revenues, and they have zero interest in the inner workings and management of the companies they acquire.