Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawmakers seek White House review of port deal with Arab
newsday.com ^ | 02-16-06 | devlin barrett

Posted on 02/16/2006 11:23:35 AM PST by takenoprisoner

WASHINGTON -- U.S. lawmakers formally asked the Bush administration Thursday to reconsider its approval of a sale giving a company in the United Arab Emirates control over significant operations at six major American ports.

The lawmakers, including four senators and three House members, sharply criticized the UAE as inconsistent in its support of U.S. anti-terrorism efforts.

They also said the country was a key transfer point for shipments of nuclear components sent to Iran, North Korea and Libya and was one of only three nations that had recognized the Taliban as Afghanistan's legitimate government.

read more

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: Louisiana; US: Maryland; US: New Jersey; US: New York; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: arabcontrol; florida; hamascontrol; maryland; muslimcontrol; newjersey; newyork; pennsylvania; ports; portsauthority; uae
This is suicide.
1 posted on 02/16/2006 11:23:37 AM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
I think it is a wise decision to review this throughly, especially when: " P&O and DPW said for the deal to go through, the committee must agree not to formally investigate the purchase or Bush must not move to block the sale for national security purposes".

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,185107,00.html
2 posted on 02/16/2006 11:26:53 AM PST by sasha123 (Sasha123)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

Insanity abounds.

Sure, keep our borders porous AND let an Arab Company take over control of the ports in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.

Brilliant.


3 posted on 02/16/2006 11:30:38 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

congressman Peter King is all over this, and he is loudly criticizing the treasury department for this decision.


4 posted on 02/16/2006 11:36:40 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

We have gone nuts.


5 posted on 02/16/2006 11:59:52 AM PST by ANGGAPO (LayteGulfBeachClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

I'd like you all to meet the new guard. Hens, let me introduce Mr. Fox.


6 posted on 02/16/2006 12:02:42 PM PST by auboy (The press practices free screech. And they're really good at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

Also, keep in mind - that this has nothing to do with "hate Bush agenda". The letter written to Secretary Snow TODAY requesting a throrough investigation into this matter was written by both Republicans and Democrats.

Check out the letter written today:

www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Dubai_Ports_letter.pdf


7 posted on 02/16/2006 12:05:00 PM PST by sasha123 (Sasha123)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

Although several freepers have poo poo'd this as no big deal, I heard today that this Arab group will be in charge of port security. If that's true, this is a BIG deal.


8 posted on 02/16/2006 12:13:35 PM PST by Peach (Hillary ran over a cop and didn't even stop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

yes, that would be part of their responsibilies


9 posted on 02/16/2006 12:27:12 PM PST by sasha123 (Sasha123)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Nine whole replies...hmmm, I suppose FReepers would rather biatch about the media on the Cheney threads....


10 posted on 02/16/2006 1:08:25 PM PST by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

bump


11 posted on 02/16/2006 1:10:56 PM PST by Eepsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sasha123; Peach

congressman Peter King is going to help take this thing down.


12 posted on 02/16/2006 1:20:58 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Although several freepers have poo poo'd this as no big deal, I heard today that this Arab group will be in charge of port security. If that's true, this is a BIG deal.




I would be weary of any freeper or any citizen or anyone in America who would belch this as "no big deal."


13 posted on 02/16/2006 1:31:58 PM PST by takenoprisoner (Afterall, American ports run by muslims is a good thing right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ContemptofCourt

"Nine whole replies...hmmm, I suppose FReepers would rather biatch about the media on the Cheney threads...."

National security at our ports of entry? We don't need no stinkin security...


14 posted on 02/16/2006 1:42:08 PM PST by takenoprisoner (Afterall, American ports run by muslims is a good thing right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

this is a scenario the CFIUS needs to consider, it doesn't seem that they have:

"Seaports have not only been identified as terrorist targets, but also as potential low-tech gateways for the introduction of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) into the U.S. homeland. In his 2000 Foreign Affairs article, retired USCG Commander Steven Flynn mapped out a nightmare scenario:

“…why should a rogue state or terrorist organization invest in ballistic missile technologies when a weapon of mass destruction could be loaded into a container and sent anywhere in the world? Osama bin Laden could have a front company in Karachi, Pakistan, load a biological agent into a container ultimately destined for Newark, New Jersey, with virtually no risk that it would be intercepted. He could use a Pakistani exporter with an established record of trade in the United States. The container would then be sent via Singapore or Hong Kong to mingle with the half million containers that are handled by each of these ports every month. It could arrive in Long Beach or Los Angeles…”[2]"

http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/si/2005/Feb/henriksonfeb05.asp


15 posted on 02/18/2006 6:11:15 PM PST by sasha123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
Who would you rather hve rewarded these contracts? Clinton!?

It's disgusting that the people here can't accept the administration doesn't' know what's best. Everyone won't agree with every decision, but they know more than us and that's how they chose.
16 posted on 02/18/2006 6:16:48 PM PST by bushisforpeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bushisforpeace

I guess none of knew that A Chinese/Hong Kong company is a major shareholder/owner of our NY Port
http://www.global-terminal.com/t3/index.php?id=181

see below:


Facility Information
TERMINAL DATA
Port
Port of New York/New Jersey

Port Operator:
The Port of Authority of New York and New Jersey

Terminal Operator:
Global Terminal & Container Services Inc.

Terminal Location:

302 Port Jersey Blvd.
Jersey City, NJ
07305

Owner/Major Shareholder:
Orient Overseas (International) Limited, Hong Kong

(I am becoming more disgusted by the day)




17 posted on 02/18/2006 8:29:06 PM PST by sasha123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bushisforpeace

" Everyone won't agree with every decision, but they know more than us and that's how they chose."

Bears repeating.


18 posted on 02/18/2006 10:18:00 PM PST by takenoprisoner (Afterall, American ports run by muslims is a good thing right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sasha123

They'll most likely hit us at every port they occupy and control including our rail stations simultaneously with smuggled wmds.


19 posted on 02/18/2006 10:27:37 PM PST by takenoprisoner (Afterall, American ports run by muslims is a good thing right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson