Posted on 02/14/2006 5:25:30 AM PST by saveliberty
Tony Snow is back and better than ever! Tony's guests and topics on today's Tony Snow Show include:
Tony Saves Your Love Life
On the occasion of Valentine's Day, Tony endeavors to save the love lives of the married and the single alike. Not only is our host a political guru, he's an expert in affairs of the heart as well!
The Terrier Press
Like a small dog with a death grip on a toy, the White House press corps growled and tugged at Scott McLellan regarding the Vice President's accidental shooting of his hunting partner. The results were predictably silly.
Muslim Rage
Muslim author and scholar Irshad Manji gives us further insight into the anger behind the cartoon furor. When will the riots and protests end?
You can find out more information about the line-up, stream Tony's show, find local radio stations as well as other fun stuff off his website.
CLICK HERE and follow the "Listen Live" link to stream the show which runs from 9 AM est to noon.
moongriffon.com streams the show every day from 3:00 to 6:00 PM (EDT).
WKRC airs Tony’s show on the web from 9-12 EST. Another way to hear Tony’s show is by streaming it at 7pm
CST on klif.com
Yet another source of the show is at 1190wamt.com which streams at least part of Tony’s show during its regular air time.
XM Channel 165 also airs the show for satellite radio subscribers.
You can also listen to Tony on WGTX live, in color and on time.........HERE
To call the show and talk to Tony dial: 1.866.408.SNOW
And there's more!
Here's the deal: For those fans who would like to ask for a photo-- please send an email request to Tony at tonysnow@foxnews.com (please note in the subject line of the email "For Tony") and provide your home mailing (not email) address. Tony will send you a real, actual, signed photo -- not stuff that people have to download. Please pass it on.
By the way, if you miss anything, the show is streamed again immediately after the three hours. Please feel free to add thread narrative about what is aired on the show as a group effort is helpful to get more of the content posted and is much appreciated by those reading the thread later.
If you’d like on or off the Tony Snow Show ping list, please post a request.
All requests happily honored.
"Woof" is used in broadcasting to say "stop," "that's enough" or to mark a specific point in time
-- which is what is done in this case. "Tony's show starts in 3 minutes: WOOF!" Means in 3 minutes from-- NOW!
Hey Tony, While you're on the oil topic, don't forget that the Kennedys also have some oil wells and are against windmills in their backyards.
LOL! Good one PT!
LOL! Lucky for us that they did.
I've been my grandson's gun safety instructor ever since one of our foolish relatives gave him a BB gun for his 9th birthday.
Set him up with one of my .22 rifles along with his new Red Ryder on some targets and did a little coaching. He's worked himself into a real good shot and handles most of the guns I've got around our place (My 12ga(s) and the .300 WinMag are too stout yet) and disses the BB gun as a hazardous toy about the same way I do.
The idea of living around here WITHOUT guns and being able to competently handle them is almost as silly to me as taking away my toolbox and sending me out to fix your car.
Hey Fox! Happy Birthday, FRiend! Sorry to be late with this greeting....it's a West Coast thang, dontcha know! Hope it's the best birthday yet! And thanks, too, for reminding what a gift Tony, his show, and this thread are to all of us! Continuing prayers for Tony, you and our FRiends on the thread!
Happy to be slaving away so you can enjoy your retirement!! Think I'll write to Uncle Sam and have my money directed to you instead of some slouch!
Once again, Happy Birthday, and as my Dad used to say, when he woke up and didn't see his name in the Irish Scratch Sheet, it was a good day! ;>)
Hi ya Fudd Fan! Still catching up.......is the Olympic bashing over! LOL
New Olympic event.
Hi PTD,
At least some journalists are covering actual issues. Found this interesting - maybe a topic for Tony one day this week
(Judith) MILLER FIGHTS SUBPOENA (For 2001 tipoff to Al Qaeda fundraisers)
NY Post ^ | 2/14/06 | KATI CORNELL SMITH
Posted on 02/14/2006 4:26:09 AM PST by jimbo123
Former New York Times reporter Judith Miller turned up at a federal appeals court in Manhattan yesterday for arguments over whether the feds have a right to subpoena her phone records as part of a probe into Islamic charities and terror financing.
The New York Times is seeking to stop authorities from gaining access to records for calls that Miller and another reporter, Philip Shenon, made to sources in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
And a couple of interesting posts from this thread:
And you wanna know something else? There's a certain name that pops up in this case too......
Page 13
On December 3, 2001, consistent with
The Times’ policy of seeking comment from the subjects of its articles,
Miller telephoned HLF (Holy Land Foundation) and spoke with HLF
representatives about the information that had been disclosed to
her by one or more confidential sources. According to Miller, she
sought comment from HLF at this time only "about the government’s
intent to block HLF’s assets," and she did not intend to tip-off HLF
about the impending FBI search of HLF’s offices. Patrick J.
Fitzgerald, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois
("Fitzgerald"), representing the government, has stated that on the
night of December 3, 2001, Miller disclosed to HLF personnel that "government action was imminent"
(Affirmation of Patrick J. Fitzgerald, dated Nov. 19, 2004, and that
the HLF personnel were surprised by the information conveyed by Miller.
According to Miller, "[t]hat government action was taken against [HLF]
did not come as a surprise to even a casual observer."
THE NEW YORK TIMES CO. V. ALBERTO GONZALES 2-24-05
7 posted on 02/14/2006 4:49:40 AM PST by OXENinFLA
Well I hope the appeals court does it's job and comes through on this one ...
If Fitzgerald wins on appeal, what happens if the "Libby Rule" is applied to Miller's testimony? The "Libby Rule" being that the government has to have the other elements of its case in place in order to require truthful testimony.
Miller might as well get her place in line for the legal battles between the government and the press that are inevitably going to happen ...
This, NYT v. Gonzales, is a fairly important case regarding reporter/source privilege. The current legal posture based on Judge Swett's ruling is at odds with the outcome of the "Miller and Cooper Must Testify" case in the context of the Plame disclosure.
If the Plame case is bogus, should the legal rulings made therein be disregarded?
25 posted on 02/14/2006 6:48:40 AM PST by Cboldt
... [tons of VERY interesting and informative data -snipped-]
In other words, Patrick Fitzgerald may already have known who leaked news of the impending FBI government action before the federal case was even filed.
It poses an interesting quandry. If Sweet's ruling is upheld, then presumably Fitzgerald cannot use those phone records even to investigate the leakers (fruit of the poisoned tree); if it's upheld, he can. But everything depends upon the fate of the appeal of Sweet's ruling -- not on the testimony of Judith Miller.
In fact, I am certain that Miller would refuse to testify about the HLF case in any event, on grounds much firmer than some journalistic shield law: she would probably stand on the Fifth Amendment, since she could well be incriminated as an accessory or even accomplice in obstruction of justice. And she could not be put in jail for refusing to testify if she took the Fifth, as she could (we now see) for refusing to testify on grounds of journalistic "privilege."
This is because a few days before Judge Sweet made his ruling, the D.C. Circuit held in Miller v. United States/Cooper v. United States that the reporters themselves could be compelled to testify; as this is certainly more chilling to investigative journalism than merely obtaining phone records, I suspect that Fitzgerald believes that when Sweet's ruling comes up in the New York Circuit -- or at least before the Supreme Court -- that it will be overturned. In which case, Fitzgerald can subpoena Miller and Shenon at that time (under a new or extended grand jury) and compel testimony, telephone records in hand, about who tipped them off to the action against HLF and GRF. Even if they take the Fifth, Fitzgerald can still proceed against whoever is incriminated by the phone records.
http://biglizards.net/blog/archives/2005/10/millers_time.html
29 posted on 02/14/2006 7:07:19 AM PST by Cboldt
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1578133/posts
you have mail...
hee-hee! Cute...could have made it kitties and had more kitties in distress! :o)
You're welcome!
LOL! Thanks, I'll have to watch for it!! (Do they make a disclaimer that no actual penquins are harmed during the competition!!) ;>)
LOL!
LOL! I am trying to dig through my in box. The goal is to recover the desk, but the "backups" are failing LOL!
LOL! That will be the one and only time
Thanks for the links! Will catch up on them later! Was the press corps nuts enough yesterday! You couldn't make this stuff up!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.