Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Physicist to Present New Exact Solution of Einstein's Gravitational Field Equation [Anti-Gravity!]
PhysOrg.com ^ | 11 February 2006 | Staff

Posted on 02/11/2006 4:31:06 PM PST by PatrickHenry

On Tuesday, Feb. 14, noted physicist Dr. Franklin Felber will present his new exact solution of Einstein's 90-year-old gravitational field equation to the Space Technology and Applications International Forum (STAIF) in Albuquerque. The solution is the first that accounts for masses moving near the speed of light.

New antigravity solution will enable space travel near speed of light by the end of this century, he predicts.

Felber's antigravity discovery solves the two greatest engineering challenges to space travel near the speed of light: identifying an energy source capable of producing the acceleration; and limiting stresses on humans and equipment during rapid acceleration.

"Dr. Felber's research will revolutionize space flight mechanics by offering an entirely new way to send spacecraft into flight," said Dr. Eric Davis, Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin and STAIF peer reviewer of Felber's work. "His rigorously tested and truly unique thinking has taken us a huge step forward in making near-speed-of-light space travel safe, possible, and much less costly."

The field equation of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity has never before been solved to calculate the gravitational field of a mass moving close to the speed of light. Felber's research shows that any mass moving faster than 57.7 percent of the speed of light will gravitationally repel other masses lying within a narrow 'antigravity beam' in front of it. The closer a mass gets to the speed of light, the stronger its 'antigravity beam' becomes.

Felber's calculations show how to use the repulsion of a body speeding through space to provide the enormous energy needed to accelerate massive payloads quickly with negligible stress. The new solution of Einstein's field equation shows that the payload would 'fall weightlessly' in an antigravity beam even as it was accelerated close to the speed of light.

Accelerating a 1-ton payload to 90 percent of the speed of light requires an energy of at least 30 billion tons of TNT. In the 'antigravity beam' of a speeding star, a payload would draw its energy from the antigravity force of the much more massive star. In effect, the payload would be hitching a ride on a star.

"Based on this research, I expect a mission to accelerate a massive payload to a 'good fraction of light speed' will be launched before the end of this century," said Dr. Felber. "These antigravity solutions of Einstein's theory can change our view of our ability to travel to the far reaches of our universe."

More immediately, Felber's new solution can be used to test Einstein's theory of gravity at low cost in a storage-ring laboratory facility by detecting antigravity in the unexplored regime of near-speed-of-light velocities.

During his 30-year career, Dr. Felber has led physics research and development programs for the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, the Department of Energy and Department of Transportation, the National Institute of Justice, National Institutes of Health, and national laboratories. Dr. Felber is Vice President and Co-founder of Starmark.

Source: Starmark [Felber's own firm, apparently]


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: cosmology; gravity; physics; podkletnov
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-223 next last
To: PatrickHenry
The field equation of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity has never before been solved to calculate the gravitational field of a mass moving close to the speed of light. Felber's research shows that any mass moving faster than 57.7 percent of the speed of light will gravitationally repel other masses lying within a narrow 'antigravity beam' in front of it. The closer a mass gets to the speed of light, the stronger its 'antigravity beam' becomes.

Hmmm, an offshoot of the hypervelocity penetrators from the DoD? ;-)

Look at it this way, you have a 1-kg projectile going at 0.57 c. It is headed for a 50-ton tank initially at rest. From F=ma, there is NO WAY the repulsive force from the penetrator is going to accelerate the tank out of the way before impact. Scratch (and dent, and obliterate) one armored vehicle.

Full Disclosure: Yes, I knew people who worked on supercomputer modeling of projectile-armor dynamics. What of it?

Second Disclosure: YES, I *read* the article, and *YES* I'm aware that that's not what it's really about. . .

Cheers!

21 posted on 02/11/2006 4:47:25 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"Broca's Brian" ...
..and now...
"Einstein's Gut" ??

I LIKE it! :-)

Cheers!

22 posted on 02/11/2006 4:48:43 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Thats all well an good... can we go back to the Moon already?


23 posted on 02/11/2006 4:49:51 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Improbability Drive?


24 posted on 02/11/2006 4:51:35 PM PST by bikepacker67 (Islam was born of Hagar the whore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
It's the year 2000. I was promised a flying car. There are no flying cars. I don't wee any flying cars. Why? Why? Why?
25 posted on 02/11/2006 4:52:24 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

Thanks for the link. I still don't know what to make of this.


26 posted on 02/11/2006 4:52:39 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I donno about this one, but Dr. Felber seems like he's had a responsible career.

Yeah, but as a project administrator, according to this. Also, he's kind of old to be doing innovative work; I suspect if there's anything to this at all, he's fronting for some much younger guys.

27 posted on 02/11/2006 4:53:56 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grut
I suspect if there's anything to this at all, he's fronting for some much younger guys.

I doubt that. If a younger guy did this work, he'd kill to get it published in his own name.

28 posted on 02/11/2006 4:55:41 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

this almost sounds like the concept behind the supercavatating torpedo.


29 posted on 02/11/2006 4:55:41 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
So if you get to .57 the rest is free? How do you slow down?
30 posted on 02/11/2006 4:56:46 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67

Spindizzies !


31 posted on 02/11/2006 4:57:22 PM PST by Drammach (In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67

Don't panic.


32 posted on 02/11/2006 4:57:49 PM PST by Buck W. (John Kerry: The Emir of Absurdistan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Felber's research shows that any mass moving faster than 57.7 percent of the speed of light will gravitationally repel other masses lying within a narrow 'antigravity beam' in front of it. The closer a mass gets to the speed of light, the stronger its 'antigravity beam' becomes.

So how do you slow down?

33 posted on 02/11/2006 4:58:42 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

I don't either, I googled him under "Franklin S. Felbar" and physics and got some interesting stuff...Princeton, USC, and some interesting science projects...and more when you google him under "Franklin Felbar" and Physics.

This is no kook.

Now how good his equations are is another thing. But if it pans out and the tests work like his stuff predicts...very, very cool!


34 posted on 02/11/2006 4:59:02 PM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob

You've already considered this, right?


35 posted on 02/11/2006 5:00:10 PM PST by Tax-chick (My remark was stupid, and I'm a slave of the patriarchy. So?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
So how do you slow down?

Well, your speed limit is c...

36 posted on 02/11/2006 5:00:30 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Physicist
So if you get to .57 the rest is free? How do you slow down?

It can't work like that. As I understand it (at a primitive level) particle accelerators have to keep on chugging to move stuff up close to lightspeed. This effect, if real, should have been detected by now. Perhaps one of the smart guys will chime in and help us out.

37 posted on 02/11/2006 5:00:36 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

I could be wrong; we'll see.


38 posted on 02/11/2006 5:01:40 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The field equation of Einstein's General Theory of "Relativity has never before been solved to calculate the gravitational field of a mass moving close to the speed of light. Felber's research shows that any mass moving faster than 57.7 percent of the speed of light will gravitationally repel other masses lying within a narrow 'antigravity beam' in front of it. The closer a mass gets to the speed of light, the stronger its 'antigravity beam' becomes."

Dr Felber is looking for volunteers to test this theory. I will pray that no huge masses get in your way when v < .577c.

39 posted on 02/11/2006 5:02:07 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
It can't work like that.

I wouldn't propose such a thing, it just sounds like Felber is saying that. Your payload will fall forward weightlessly in its own antigravity beam.

Well, isn't that just special?

40 posted on 02/11/2006 5:04:11 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-223 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson