Posted on 02/10/2006 8:00:19 PM PST by FreeManDC
Administration renews attack on public broadcasting with funding cuts similar to those rejected by Congress and the American people in June
WASHINGTON February 6, 2006 John Lawson, president and CEO of the Association of Public Television Stations (APTS), condemned cuts in federal funding for public broadcasting recommended by the Bush Administration earlier today. Lawson said: By submitting a budget proposal with cuts of this magnitude, the Administration is completely ignoring the will of the American people as they expressed it quite vocally last June. In now renewing the attack on public broadcasting, the Administration is saying the opinions of the American people do not matter.
The Administrations budget proposal would rescind more than $100 million in federal funding for public broadcasting over FY2007 and FY2008. Lawson said: In addition to drastic cuts over the next two years, the budget proposes no federal funding for FY2009. With this tactic, the Administration may be laying the foundation for the elimination of all federal funding for public broadcasting. The Administration declined to recommend advance funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides grants for local station operations and national programming. Among other things, the practice of advance funding which has been in place for the past thirty years protects public broadcasting from political abuse.
The Administration also proposes completely eliminating funding for the highly-successful Ready To Teach program, which provides funding for online resources for teachers seeking quality professional development that is easily accessible, flexible and tailored to local, state and national standards. In another section of the Presidents budget, the Administration requests funds to upgrade the skills of tens of thousands of math and science teachers.
The budget also proposes the elimination of targeted grants for the federally-mandated digital conversion of stations, and funding for the satellite interconnection system that distributes PBS and other programming to local public television stations. Lawson said: Its not just ironic, its sad that the Administration wants to eliminate federal support for local public televisions digital conversion at the same time that Congress has set February 17, 2009 for the end of analog broadcasts.
Finally, the budget proposes the elimination of the Public Telecommunications Facilities Program (PTFP). As Gulf Coast stations struggled to meet local communications needs in the wake of the devastation caused by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, PTFP was the only source of emergency federal funding to help. Lawson said: The decision to eliminate PTFP is a serious blow to a program that played an indispensable role in Gulf Coast recovery. PTFP is essential, as this program is an investment in public broadcasting stations physical capital, enabling them to deliver expanded programming and services tailored to the needs of local communities.
Lawson said: The cuts, amounting to $157 million, or 30 percent less this year than in FY2006, are devastating. As we did last year, our stations will work together with our supporters across the country to fight these cuts vigorously. In one bright spot for public television, the Administration proposed level funding for the Ready To Learn program at the Department of Education.
Awesome! I just wish he proposed 100% cuts.
"Bush Proposes to Cut PBS Funding by 30%"
Sweet.
State-run television makes me think of Iran.
Oh no! They won't be able to afford the ten billionth rerun of "Are you being served?"!!!!
< Insert Happy Dance Here >
If only they go through with this, great. But in the past, they have always backed down.
Also great that they are pulling funding for TV stations to switch to digital programming. Why on earth should the taxpayers fund the media so they can use it to broadcast more sleaze and lies? Why should Bush help the people who are so busy attacking him?
You've got my vote on that one, Mr. President.
We need across the board spending cuts, in every single program.
How about doing the same with NPR?
I was just fixin to say 30% ????
Why not 100% ? Could someone please find the part of the Constitution that gives the federal government the authority to spend our tax money for that purpose?
CUT MORE! CUT MORE! CUT MORE! CUT IT ALL!
I must have been sleeping in June. I didn't hear any great uprising against cutting the anti American NPR budget. I would love to see a 100 percent slash. Let the Freaking liberals that love it dig into their wallets.
(sob)
What do you mean by this? And why do you just post articles without ever commenting on them?
Why don't require the near billions of dollars raked in by Barney, Teletubbies, Sesame Street, etc... to be paid back into PBS? If even a percentage was paid back in, no need for tax dollars.
I am disappointed....
.... that he only proposed a 30% cut, but it's a start.
The Republicans are starting to say a lot of the right things now, but most of us don't believe them. Does anybody think this cut will make it through Congress? Their best weapon is that the Rats have passed Prozacville and are moving into Droolerstown.
Bingo! What the hell is the Federal Government have to do with Pubic (sic) Broad-casting. Then again, we can dial 1-800-BILL-CLINTON.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.