Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Proposes to Cut PBS Funding by 30% (sob)
http://www.apts.org/news/budget07.cfm ^ | February 6, 2006 | FreeManDC

Posted on 02/10/2006 8:00:19 PM PST by FreeManDC

Administration renews attack on public broadcasting with funding cuts similar to those rejected by Congress and the American people in June

WASHINGTON – February 6, 2006 – John Lawson, president and CEO of the Association of Public Television Stations (APTS), condemned cuts in federal funding for public broadcasting recommended by the Bush Administration earlier today. Lawson said: “By submitting a budget proposal with cuts of this magnitude, the Administration is completely ignoring the will of the American people as they expressed it quite vocally last June. In now renewing the attack on public broadcasting, the Administration is saying the opinions of the American people do not matter.”

The Administration’s budget proposal would rescind more than $100 million in federal funding for public broadcasting over FY2007 and FY2008. Lawson said: “In addition to drastic cuts over the next two years, the budget proposes no federal funding for FY2009. With this tactic, the Administration may be laying the foundation for the elimination of all federal funding for public broadcasting.” The Administration declined to recommend advance funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides grants for local station operations and national programming. Among other things, the practice of advance funding – which has been in place for the past thirty years – protects public broadcasting from political abuse.

The Administration also proposes completely eliminating funding for the highly-successful Ready To Teach program, which provides funding for online resources for teachers seeking quality professional development that is easily accessible, flexible and tailored to local, state and national standards. In another section of the President’s budget, the Administration requests funds to upgrade the skills of tens of thousands of math and science teachers.

The budget also proposes the elimination of targeted grants for the federally-mandated digital conversion of stations, and funding for the satellite interconnection system that distributes PBS and other programming to local public television stations. Lawson said: “It’s not just ironic, it’s sad that the Administration wants to eliminate federal support for local public television’s digital conversion at the same time that Congress has set February 17, 2009 for the end of analog broadcasts.”

Finally, the budget proposes the elimination of the Public Telecommunications Facilities Program (PTFP). As Gulf Coast stations struggled to meet local communications needs in the wake of the devastation caused by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, PTFP was the only source of emergency federal funding to help. Lawson said: “The decision to eliminate PTFP is a serious blow to a program that played an indispensable role in Gulf Coast recovery. PTFP is essential, as this program is an investment in public broadcasting stations’ physical capital, enabling them to deliver expanded programming and services tailored to the needs of local communities.”

Lawson said: “The cuts, amounting to $157 million, or 30 percent less this year than in FY2006, are devastating. As we did last year, our stations will work together with our supporters across the country to fight these cuts vigorously.” In one bright spot for public television, the Administration proposed level funding for the Ready To Learn program at the Department of Education.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: defundpbs; federalspending; pbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

1 posted on 02/10/2006 8:00:21 PM PST by FreeManDC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

Awesome! I just wish he proposed 100% cuts.


2 posted on 02/10/2006 8:01:39 PM PST by Brett66 (Where government advances – and it advances relentlessly – freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

"Bush Proposes to Cut PBS Funding by 30%"

Sweet.

State-run television makes me think of Iran.


3 posted on 02/10/2006 8:02:35 PM PST by NapkinUser (Georgia FReepers: FReepmail me to be on my 'Casey Cagle for Lt. Governor' ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

Oh no! They won't be able to afford the ten billionth rerun of "Are you being served?"!!!!


4 posted on 02/10/2006 8:03:29 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (An agnostic for religious freedom, not Islamofascistic multiculti PC secularism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

< Insert Happy Dance Here >


5 posted on 02/10/2006 8:03:51 PM PST by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

If only they go through with this, great. But in the past, they have always backed down.

Also great that they are pulling funding for TV stations to switch to digital programming. Why on earth should the taxpayers fund the media so they can use it to broadcast more sleaze and lies? Why should Bush help the people who are so busy attacking him?


6 posted on 02/10/2006 8:04:45 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

You've got my vote on that one, Mr. President.

7 posted on 02/10/2006 8:07:21 PM PST by GretchenM (What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

8 posted on 02/10/2006 8:08:19 PM PST by NordP (Karl Rove's b-day is Dec 25th. It seems a great carpenter values a good architect ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

We need across the board spending cuts, in every single program.


9 posted on 02/10/2006 8:10:00 PM PST by Eighth Street
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC
I axed before and I'm axing again: are they axing the current budget by 30% or are they axing the projected rate of growth of current budget by 30% (as they usually do to fool the fools.)
10 posted on 02/10/2006 8:10:18 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

How about doing the same with NPR?


11 posted on 02/10/2006 8:11:43 PM PST by Mulch (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66

I was just fixin to say 30% ????

Why not 100% ? Could someone please find the part of the Constitution that gives the federal government the authority to spend our tax money for that purpose?


12 posted on 02/10/2006 8:11:57 PM PST by Zerano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

CUT MORE! CUT MORE! CUT MORE! CUT IT ALL!


13 posted on 02/10/2006 8:14:09 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC
ignoring the will of the American people as they expressed it quite vocally last June

I must have been sleeping in June. I didn't hear any great uprising against cutting the anti American NPR budget. I would love to see a 100 percent slash. Let the Freaking liberals that love it dig into their wallets.

14 posted on 02/10/2006 8:15:02 PM PST by zip (Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough become truth to 48% of all Americans (NRA)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

(sob)

What do you mean by this? And why do you just post articles without ever commenting on them?


15 posted on 02/10/2006 8:15:18 PM PST by Rebelbase (President Bush is a Texas jackass when it comes to Border security .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

Why don't require the near billions of dollars raked in by Barney, Teletubbies, Sesame Street, etc... to be paid back into PBS? If even a percentage was paid back in, no need for tax dollars.


16 posted on 02/10/2006 8:16:14 PM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC

I am disappointed....


.... that he only proposed a 30% cut, but it's a start.


17 posted on 02/10/2006 8:16:45 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC
While I'm sure I'm in the minority, I believe in some federal funding of the arts... What I don't agree with is the high wages that folks are drawing from PBS. I don't agree with the benefits packages that would put any union shop to shame. I don't agree with paying for the same benefits for family members, including domestic partnerships (or whatever.)

Anything that is funded by donations should pay just enough of a wage to get the people that are needed, not who is desired. If a station executive is unhappy or unable to survive on a 80k salary, then fine, open the position to someone else. 90% of the stations could be better run by college students than draining off so much funds for retirement funds, benefit plans, huge salaries, etc.

So if PBS is upset about losing 30% of the funding - hey, why not try something that other companies do - trim the fat!
18 posted on 02/10/2006 8:16:50 PM PST by kingu (Liberalism: The art of sticking your fingers in your ears and going NANANANA..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
If local PBS producers can own a house like the people in Family Ties did, they definitely make too much money. I thought the most realistic part of that show was that the father worked for PBS and was a liberal pinhead.

The Republicans are starting to say a lot of the right things now, but most of us don't believe them. Does anybody think this cut will make it through Congress? Their best weapon is that the Rats have passed Prozacville and are moving into Droolerstown.

19 posted on 02/10/2006 8:17:21 PM PST by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Awesome! I just wish he proposed 100% cuts.

Bingo! What the hell is the Federal Government have to do with Pubic (sic) Broad-casting. Then again, we can dial 1-800-BILL-CLINTON.

20 posted on 02/10/2006 8:17:58 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson