Awesome! I just wish he proposed 100% cuts.
I was just fixin to say 30% ????
Why not 100% ? Could someone please find the part of the Constitution that gives the federal government the authority to spend our tax money for that purpose?
The Republicans are starting to say a lot of the right things now, but most of us don't believe them. Does anybody think this cut will make it through Congress? Their best weapon is that the Rats have passed Prozacville and are moving into Droolerstown.
Bingo! What the hell is the Federal Government have to do with Pubic (sic) Broad-casting. Then again, we can dial 1-800-BILL-CLINTON.
GINGRICH TRIED TO ELIMINATE THE FUNDING, BUT COULD ONLY CUT. IT IS LIKE A VAMPIRE, KEEPS SUCKING BLOOD AFTER YOU DRIVE THE STAKE THRU ITS HEART.
100% works for me! PBS is liberal and a waste of our tax dollars.
Amen to that brother, and cut out NPR funding while they're at it.
The American people paying to keep PBS and NPR on the air makes as much sense as would the Israeli people paying to keep Al Jazeera on the air. If the lefty moonbats have to have their own propaganda network let George Soros pay for it.
100%. That's what I thought as I read the headline. Then I read the article, and was sure of it. Any job worth doing is worth doing well!
Well you beat me to it. I was going to say he is 70% short.
He should hit NPR while he's at it.
My thoughts indeed. Why is President Bush continuing to go soft on them? :p
Bush is a liberal. Why not 100% ?
If funding is cut, PBS will never be able to finish their analysis of why Al Gore lost.
Cut it more.