Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mayor faults White House terror plot communication [LA's Villaraigosa]
AP ^ | 2/9/6 | MICHAEL R. BLOOD

Posted on 02/09/2006 1:00:32 PM PST by SmithL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: SmithL
He did not advocate an immediate withdrawal of troops.

Has L.A. been occupied?

Not a direct quote, so maybe the article writer thinks the city has troops in it. Or maybe the writer just thinks this is something appropriate for a mayor to talk about any time he happens to speak in public.

21 posted on 02/09/2006 1:13:29 PM PST by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Hal
I am sure the proper LA authorities were aware of this.

I'm not 100% sure that would have been the case. Once the LA threat was neutralized, any airing of it might have limited our ability to stop other threats by compromising the sources and methods used.

22 posted on 02/09/2006 1:13:35 PM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

All: There is some confusion on this thread. What he is objecting to is not that he wasn't notified 3 years ago but that he as Mayor now wasn't notified prior to Bush announcing this. Perhaps Bush's staff should have thought of that as a courtesy. OK. I'll concede that. But announcing now that he wasn't in the loop today prior to Bush's announcement makes him look even worse.
I'm surprised he would admit it he is so unimportant that he wasn't contacted.

Dems have become the Whinocrat Party.


23 posted on 02/09/2006 1:14:48 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
1) He wasn't mayor at the time

2) The LA FBI office, the LAPD and even the building owner were all alerted to the possibility that the building could be targeted days after 9/11. See: Article dated Apr 2004 -Post #100

3) Los Angeles received 65 million in DHS funds during the fiscal year 2005 under the Homeland Security Grant Program and Urban Areas Security Initiative. See DHS Website. They come third on the funding list behind New York and WDC.

24 posted on 02/09/2006 1:16:44 PM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

""I go to work every day knowing that we are a target," the mayor said."

OK... Why are you surprised? Not sure why he is acting surprised about something he acknowledges is an every day possibility.


25 posted on 02/09/2006 1:17:22 PM PST by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

maybe he couldn't be trusted not to leak. Don't worry, Mr Mayor, the grownups are in charge. Go back to your treadmill.


26 posted on 02/09/2006 1:18:44 PM PST by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_Handed_Writer

I remember FR discussing this, so thanks for the link to an article. Odd Sheppard at FNC didn't bring this up but went along with the "never hear it" crowd.


27 posted on 02/09/2006 1:18:47 PM PST by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"I'm amazed that the president would make this (announcement) on national TV and not inform us of these details through the appropriate channels," the mayor said in an interview with The Associated Press. "I don't expect a call from the president — but somebody."

..maybe Hillary will notice me and choose me as her wife...err VP in the 2008 election

28 posted on 02/09/2006 1:19:52 PM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

B*tch, B*tch, B*tch


29 posted on 02/09/2006 1:21:22 PM PST by el_texicano (Liberals, Socialist, DemocRATS, all touchy, feely, mind numbed robots, useless idiots all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: el_texicano

Now, now. Name calling won't make him any smarter.


30 posted on 02/09/2006 1:24:02 PM PST by SmithL (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Antonio R. Villaraigosa is the 41st mayor of Los Angeles. He was elected on May 17, 2005 and sworn in to office on July 1, 2005.


31 posted on 02/09/2006 1:28:24 PM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

* maid it up becuz of his freefaling pole numbers. Rove will blow up Holiwould if the mayor tells the TRUTH. /DUmmie


32 posted on 02/09/2006 1:29:05 PM PST by Cyclopean Squid (Moderates do not make history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia

That's not his point. His point is to make Bush and his administration look like fools and sneaky bastards.


33 posted on 02/09/2006 1:30:12 PM PST by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I can only assume that the previous mayor was notifed. Who cares about this moron.

"Sen. John Kerry endorsed Villaraigosa at an April 30 appearance by the two at Los Angeles Valley Community College. Villaraigosa served as a vice chairperson for Kerry’s 2004 bid to defeat George W. Bush.

The Kerry endorsement added to a growing list of progressive and liberal leaders supporting Villaraigosa, including Reps. Maxine Waters and Henry Waxman, both Democrats in Congress, and Los Angeles City Council President Alex Padilla."

http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/6951/1/268


34 posted on 02/09/2006 1:31:03 PM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GungaLaGunga
Are you trying to be personally offensive here? I don't normally get "huffy" but in your case I may make an exception.

Signed,

A WOMAN

p.s. I agree with the spirit of what you said, just wish you didn't have to bash women alongside DEMONRATS.

35 posted on 02/09/2006 1:31:31 PM PST by zgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The West Coast plot isn't exactly a new revelation. The Mayor must not have a very good attention span.


36 posted on 02/09/2006 1:32:05 PM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

Patented snark reply:

Hey, Tony, now that Almeida is in intensive care, there's a slot for an Hispanic on '24'. Maybe you qualify. Sign up with Imagine Entertainment.


37 posted on 02/09/2006 1:38:42 PM PST by BelegStrongbow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

Minor point.


38 posted on 02/09/2006 1:41:01 PM PST by Old Professer (Fix the problem, not the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Hey, Antonio:

'Sears Tower was next on Qaeda list'
The Times of India ^ | March 30 2004

WASHINGTON: Chicago's Sears Tower and Los Angeles' Library Tower were to be the next targets after the terrorist attacks on World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, Al-Qaeda's puported operations chief Khalid Shiekh Mohammed now in detention, has told US interrogators, media reports said on Tuesday.

The plan for Chicago and Los Angeles were aborted because of the decisive US response to the New York and Washington attacks, Sheikh reportedly told the investigators, the Washington Times said quoting a British newspaper.

The US response disrupted the terrorist organisations' plans so thoroughly that it could not proceed, he said.

39 posted on 02/09/2006 1:47:38 PM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GungaLaGunga

Uh...I AM a woman, have ALWAYS been one, & have ALWAYS been a Republican!...and yeah, you are right about one thing, I can carry a grudge, Machoman!


40 posted on 02/09/2006 1:52:21 PM PST by top 2 toe red ("The Pres & I cannot prevent some politician's from losing their memories or their backbones." VP Ch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson