Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hamza: Cleric sent gangs to seize control of rival mosques (police refused to help moderate Muslims)
Times (UK) ^ | 9 February 2006 | Daniel McGrory and Sean O’Neill

Posted on 02/08/2006 6:18:17 PM PST by Stultis

Cleric sent gangs to seize control of rival mosques


ABU HAMZA sent teams of young supporters around the country with orders to take over other mosques.

Rival clerics have told The Times that they were threatened by gangs claiming to be members of Abu Hamza’s Supporters of Sharia group.

Some of the rivals were beaten up inside their own mosques, and worshippers were bullied into finding somewhere else to pray — but police refused to intervene.

Abu Hamza wanted to acquire more places where he and his lieutenants could brainwash a generation of young men and send them off to terror training camps abroad.

Followers who tired of his antics described how he behaved like a mafia godfather in dealing with anyone who thwarted his will. Two rival imams in London were hospitalised after being attacked, but no police action was taken.

In one of his sermons, heard by the jury during his trial at the Old Bailey, Abu Hamza boasted about his heavy-handed tactics, saying: “If the people know you are firm, they will back down. They all back down.”

His takeover attempts began in the late 1980s when he joined a group of Algerian-born radicals trying to take over the Central London Mosque in Regent’s Park.

Fazli Ali, 66, the former estates manager there, said: “Hamza and his cronies threatened me several times. I was head of security but they even threatened to kill me. Ours was a peaceful place but he wanted to turn it into a political arena.”

The leadership of the mosque banned Abu Hamza from their premises, so he sought out other, more vulnerable, targets around Britain.

These sites not only provided recruiting centres, they were also places for raising cash and a haven to carry out criminal operations such as producing bogus welfare claims and cloning credit cards.

There is evidence of how his supporters tried to seize control of mosques in Luton, Brighton, Burnley and at least another half a dozen towns.

From these places scores of UK-based Muslims and British-born Islamic converts were dispatched abroad to al-Qaeda camps and the authorities concede that they have no idea what became of these men.

A number were killed in fighting or suicide attacks, but most have disappeared.

Imams reported what was happening to police, but say that senior officers were reluctant to interfere in the internal affairs of mosques.

Some imams took Abu Hamza on in the civil courts to try to halt his plans, but such cases were expensive and rarely resolved satisfactorily. Most of his rivals were too scared to stand up to his militia.

The Abu Hamza road-show travelled across the UK, urging his young audiences to oust their elderly imams and use their mosques to recruit “jihadis”, or holy warriors.

After one visit to Burnley, in 1999, tape recordings were made of his sermons and sold in Islamic bookshops.

In one recording, one of Abu Hamza’s followers told the audience: “If we’re a group of people here in Burnley, we’ll take over the whole of Burnley. We have people with Kalashnikovs and you declare jihad against the kuffar (unbeliever). Every single Muslim outside Burnley who does not come and support you is a rebel.”

Shortly after Abu Hamza’s visit, a group of young Muslims left the town for Pakistan, telling their parents that they were going to study in a religious school.

What they were really up to emerged a few months later when two — a university student and a trainee accountant — died when an artillery shell landed on a mosque in Kabul, the capital of Afghanistan. Five other people died in the incident. The remaining youths returned to their families and confessed that they had been to Taleban training camps.

Muslim elders in Burnley banned Abu Hamza from preaching in any of the town’s mosques. They also reported what had happened to Lancashire police but maintain that no action was taken.

Abu Hamza ousted trustees who opposed him at Finsbury Park, described by police as the honeypot of his recruitment operation. The trustees complained that the police did nothing to help them, and suggested the victims seek a court order to evict the invaders.

Efforts by supporters to seize control of mosques intensified after Finsbury Park was closed down in a police raid in 2003.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: captainhook; finsburymosque; finsburyparkmosque; hamza; islamists; terrorists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 02/08/2006 6:18:21 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dog; Dog Gone; hellinahandcart; sauropod; Peach

ping


2 posted on 02/08/2006 6:19:38 PM PST by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

So Europe has all ready surrendered


3 posted on 02/08/2006 6:21:49 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Vote Democrat-We are the party of reactionary inertia".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
From the Telegraph
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/02/09/nhamz09.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/02/09/ixnewstop.html

CPS twice refused to prosecute Abu Hamza
By John Steele, Crime Correspondent and George Jones
(Filed: 09/02/2006)

Police twice formally asked prosecutors to consider terrorist charges against Abu Hamza in the seven years before he stood trial, it emerged yesterday as Tories called for a judicial inquiry into why he was not prosecuted earlier.

The Crown Prosecution Service twice decided there was "clearly insufficient" evidence to prosecute the radical Muslim cleric.

But the two "advice files" submitted by Scotland Yard to the CPS - in March 1999 and June 2003 - focused on suspected links between Hamza and Yemeni terrorists who kidnapped western hostages, killing four, including three Britons, in December 1998.

Police did not send the CPS any copies of inflammatory speeches by Hamza, which they seized in 1999 in their Yemen inquiry but handed back to him, and which subsequently formed the basis of charges on which he was convicted this week.

Nor, according to admissions agreed between the Crown and Hamza's lawyers in his trial, was Hamza questioned about the speeches in 1999.

Anti-terrorist sources have admitted that the question of whether Hamza's hate-filled rants amounted to criminal offences was not high among police priorities in 1999.

The second formal advice file, in June 2003, was the result of a review of the first Scotland Yard Yemen inquiry of 1999, and included material from a Hamza-linked website which allegedly showed his support for the kidnappers.

Last night, the Tories said a judge should be asked to find out why it took so long to prosecute 47-year-old Hamza.

David Davis, the Conservative home affairs spokesman, said it appeared that the only reason that charges of inciting murder and racial hatred were brought was because the United States had sought Hamza's extradition in 2004.

The Americans want him to face trial over his alleged conspiracy with the Yemeni kidnappers. US citizens were among the hostages.

It is understood that Lord Goldsmith, the Attorney General, made clear to police and prosecutors in 2004 - as the controversy over the suspects held by the US in Guantanmo Bay went on - that he would prefer a trial of Hamza in Britain, if the evidence justified it.

The Tories also want to know whether the police and security services were hampered by a lack of will in the Government to tackle Islamic extremism in "Londonistan".

Police have pointed out that dissident Irish terrorism was still the major threat at that time.

A joint statement yesterday by the CPS and Scotland Yard made clear that Hamza was eventually prosecuted on a third "advice file" from police which centred on recordings of inflammatory speeches inciting followers to kill Jews and non-believers, which was sent to the CPS "in batches" from 2003 onwards.

The CPS eventually decided to prosecute him in October 2004, by which time he was in custody on the US extradition warrant. The material in the Old Bailey trial came from three police seizures - two in police anti-terror operations 2003 and a third in May 2004 - when Hamza was arrested on the US extradition warrant and his home was searched. The collection of speeches and "sermons" included those handed back to him in 1999.

As well as the submission of the three formal "advice files", it is understood that informal legal advice was sought by police on whether Hamza's rabble-rousing speeches on the street outside Finsbury Park Mosque - from which he was ousted in January 2003 - amounted to criminal activity.

It is understood the advice was that these "sermons" did not reach the threshold for a criminal prosecution. Sources said there were problems with obtaining accurate records of the words said and proof that he said them.

In the joint statement yesterday, Sue Hemming, the head of the CPS's counter-terrorist division, and deputy assistant commissioner Peter Clarke, the head of Scotland Yard anti-terrorist branch, said: "The submissions relating to the Yemen and website allegations were carefully and thoroughly reviewed by experienced senior prosecutors and in both cases there was clearly insufficient evidence for a prosecution."

When the third, speech-related, file was submitted, "there was sufficient evidence and the case has been prosecuted successfully".

Some reports have claimed Hamza was an influence on the July 7 suicide bombers. However, Scotland Yard said there was no evidence for this.

Tony Blair yesterday demanded that the Tories drop their opposition to proposed new laws banning the glorification of terrorism. He told the Commons that the vast majority of Muslims in Britain "completely abhor" protests glorifying violence. Mr Davis challenged No 10's claims that adequate laws were not available to prosecute those inciting murder or racial hated. He said six of Abu Hamza's convictions were under the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, three under the 1986 Public Order Act and only the least important charge was under the Terror Act 2000.

4 posted on 02/08/2006 6:23:21 PM PST by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Some of the rivals were beaten up inside their own mosques, and worshippers were bullied into finding somewhere else to pray — but police refused to intervene.

Amazing

5 posted on 02/08/2006 6:25:43 PM PST by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

Infighting now. Get the popcorn.


6 posted on 02/08/2006 6:36:50 PM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

So Europe has all ready surrendered.

It's no better here. Look at all the editors hiding under their desks out of fear.


7 posted on 02/08/2006 6:39:20 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BW2221
Look at our military killing Islamo fascists in Iraq and Afghanistan. Junk Journalist cowering in fear impress me not.
8 posted on 02/08/2006 6:42:34 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Vote Democrat-We are the party of reactionary inertia".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Further evidence that Islam has become a gangland cult - run in large measure by hateful, murderous bastards who are unashamed to declare their goal -- our destruction.

We now have "Nation" targets to attack - just as soon as we really get serious about the war on Terror.

Semper Fi
9 posted on 02/08/2006 6:43:03 PM PST by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
'A number were killed in fighting or suicide attacks, but most have disappeared.'

Thank-you Marines!

Semper Fi

10 posted on 02/08/2006 6:44:03 PM PST by bubman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
So Europe has all ready surrendered

I'm not so sure. The cartoon scandal may have awakened europe just in time to save it. We'll have to see how this plays out, but we may see the backlash in coming months and years.

11 posted on 02/08/2006 7:24:26 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Hope you are right DG. Though so too until I saw the UN/EU plan to APOLOGISE to the Islamo Rioters!


12 posted on 02/08/2006 7:26:11 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Vote Democrat-We are the party of reactionary inertia".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Abu Hamza boasted about his heavy-handed tactics, saying: “If the people know you are firm, they will back down. They all back down.”

Words to remember.

13 posted on 02/08/2006 7:34:06 PM PST by lowbridge (All that is needed for evil to triumph is for "RINOS" to do something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
The EU isn't really europe. It's kind of a goofy separate leftist movement that got established and will be hard to kill. But remember that they failed to pass a constitution, so it's kind of a skeleton at this point. Or maybe it's a zombie, neither dead nor alive.

In any event, the cartoon riots will raise some national awareness again in europe, and that's not a bad thing.

14 posted on 02/08/2006 7:42:45 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
...and if they think Irish terrorism was the standard, they ain't seen nuthin yet.
15 posted on 02/08/2006 7:44:39 PM PST by ArmyTeach (Get a spine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

bttt


16 posted on 02/08/2006 7:47:30 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

bttt


17 posted on 02/08/2006 7:50:50 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
When our US Justice system finally gets our hands on this Abu Hamza critter, we need to sentence him a punishment so severe that Europe sensibilities will be thrown for a loop. Then we need to widely display the pictures of the supermax prison we bury him under.

Presuming he's found guilty, of course.

18 posted on 02/08/2006 7:51:24 PM PST by The KG9 Kid (Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Thanks DG I was really getting disgusted with what I was reading. Guess I should know better then to take the junk journalists seriously.


19 posted on 02/08/2006 7:58:59 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Vote Democrat-We are the party of reactionary inertia".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

It's really hard not to take the junk journalists seriously. The information that refutes them is not blasted in our faces every day.

They're not always wrong, and they're usually right on factual reporting on disasters or other actual incidents. Little credible evidence that disputes their reporting on those types of things ever emerges from any source.

But on political issues, both domestically and abroad, it's a totally different story. It's what they report and how they report it. If it doesn't sound right, it probably isn't. It may take some digging to find out the real story, but FR generally will have already done that for you before you start.

That's the power of this forum.


20 posted on 02/08/2006 8:13:37 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson