Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stultis
Some of the rivals were beaten up inside their own mosques, and worshippers were bullied into finding somewhere else to pray — but police refused to intervene.

Amazing

5 posted on 02/08/2006 6:25:43 PM PST by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mylife
Some of the rivals were beaten up inside their own mosques, and worshippers were bullied into finding somewhere else to pray — but police refused to intervene.

Amazing

Now, now. I detect disapproval. We must accommodate cultural differences. That's all the police were doing. It may not be our way, but it's normal for funda..., er conserva..., uh traditional Muslims to intimidate and savage co-religionists who resist their ways and threaten the purity of their native culture. And besides it's really our fault 'cause of, you know, Western oppression and colonialism and other stuff like that.</multiculturist mode>

Seriously it's a little reminiscent of the 80's. I remember there was always shock and nervousness (at the very least, and sometimes more demonstrative concern) whenever Reagan would name Soviet dissidents, or attack communist countries on their systemic humans rights abuses. The attitude was always, "Don't rock the boat," "Don't alienate the Soviets," "It'll only make things worse," and similar tripe.

The advocates of "nuance" -- not just leftists but many "mainstream" foreign policy establishment types as well -- argued that we must understand and accept that the communists just had a different system, with different standards. They weren't criminals who enslaved hundreds of millions; they just had a different world view is all. It was even argued (here more by the left) that their system had virtues ("social justice," yada, yada) that balanced out the deficiencies which capitalists "unfairly" emphasized and exaggerated.

It's not unlike that with (genuinely) moderate Muslims today. Or even Muslims, whether "moderate" or not, who belong to sectarian or ethnic minorities, regularly intimidated and attacked by (often Islamist) majorities. THEY'RE IGNORED. The media, and not just the liberal media but outlets like FoxNews as well, usually pretend they just don't exist.

The loud pushy Islamists (or the quieter but even more pushy fake "moderates") are allowed to present their extreme and particularistic version of Islam as normative, even as the ONLY Islam. Heck, they're not just allowed but actively assisted by the media, and to often by Western governments as well.

Look at the cartoon story. Newspaper after newspaper, newscast after newscast, right-wing, left-wing, mainstream, states as uncontested fact that "Islam" (full stop, unqualified) prohibits representations of the prophet Mohamed. That's complete B.S. "Islam" does no such thing. Some versions of Islam do. Some interpretations of Islam do. Others don't. But the Islam of Islamists -- radical Muslims -- is the only Islam as far as the media is concerned.

I guess radical ranters make for better ratings. But what we need to keep in mind is that every time Islamists are strengthened, every time they accrue greater legitimacy through media attention, every time the lie that their Islam is normative is allowed to sink in a little deeper, moderate and minority Muslims are weakened and made more vulnerable. And even as is they are attacked and murdered throughout the Muslim world every single day.

Sorry for the rant. This is an issue with me.

21 posted on 02/08/2006 8:21:48 PM PST by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson