Posted on 02/08/2006 4:33:12 PM PST by presidio9
A physicist who is broadly experienced in using computers to identify consistent patterns in the drip paintings of Jackson Pollock has determined that half a dozen small paintings recently discovered and claimed by their owner to be original Pollocks do not exhibit the same patterns.
The finding, by Richard P. Taylor, a physics professor at the University of Oregon, does not prove that Pollock did not paint the works, among a cache of 24 paintings found in 2003 in Wainscott, N.Y., by Alex Matter, whose father, Herbert, and mother, Mercedes, were friends of Pollock. But it casts serious doubt on their authenticity, even as Alex Matter is planning for a major exhibition of the paintings this year. And the finding could deepen a dispute among a once-unified group of Pollock scholars who have disagreed publicly over the works' origins.
In previous years Dr. Taylor examined 14 indisputably authentic Pollock paintings by using what is known as fractal geometry, or looking for patterns that recur on finer and finer magnifications, like those in snowflakes. He found that despite the seemingly chaotic nature of the drip paintings, they exhibited remarkably consistent fractal patterns, both in the fluidity of the paint and in the way Pollock applied it as he stalked around a canvas on the ground.
But in a news article being published today in the British scientific journal Nature, he says that his examination last year of transparencies of 6 of the 24 paintings discovered by Mr. Matter showed "significant differences" between their patterns and those of known Pollock works. Further, the analysis, commissioned by the New York foundation that represents Pollock's estate, showed that there were notable variations in the patterns among the six paintings.
"That's either due to one person who is extremely varied," Dr.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Sometimes a splatter is just a splatter.
I think, judging by the fluidity of the fractile patterns, that that particular work is either Joan Miro or that elephant at the zoo that does splatter painting.
My forebears used to paint a LOT better than that...
Looks like authentic spatter to me. Go figger.
I have more inspired drop cloths for interior painting than this rubbish.
So he stashed them all in his basement and made a living by selling his dropcloths to the public. ;)
BTW, I don't particularly care for Miros's palette, but he had artistic talent. Pollock, OTOH couldn't draw a stick figure.
Another artist who had talent but belongs in the huckster conversation was Dali. When he was suffering from alzheimer's, his wife got him to sign truckloads of blanks, which later got unknown artists to sketch on. So, in all likelihood that minor Dali sketch your neighbors spent a few thousand dollars on is worth about as much as the the "Persistance of Memory" poster your girlfriend had on the wall of her college dorm.
Does this mean I can post Polak jokes? :D~
Acually, if you have a color printer, you can print this one out, and it will be worth about just as much.
There was a guy who caled into Hannity today, and said that if different cultures have a right to take action when other cultures offend them, we can expect Poland to start bombing us any minute now.
LOL! Great! :)
It is interesting to note that after UK, and Australia (and sometimes Isreal), Poland has become our next closest ally.
Pollock was the first of a long line of college art majors who discovered they had no talent and suddenly became expressionists. They continue to spontaneously appear to this day.
How on earth could anyone actually tell?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.