http://www.nationalreview.com/lopez/lopez200602080754.asp
Posted on 02/08/2006 2:45:53 PM PST by Paul Ross
February 08, 2006,
7:54 a.m.
Phyllis Schlafly Was Right
Kathryn Jean Lopez, National Review, February 8, 2006
The woman has earned a few “I Told You So”s.
Most of America's girls typically don't get to celebrate Phyllis Schlafly during "Women's History Month," but they should. Mrs. Schlafly not only had the right idea when she fought the Equal Rights Amendment during the 70s, but predictions she made back then are still accurate today.
Schlafly, of course, was head of the National Committee to Stop ERA. And stop it she did — the U.S. Constitution was not amended. She argued that a federal Equal Rights Amendment was not necessary, claiming that, "the fact is that women already enjoy every constitutional right that men enjoy and have enjoyed equal employment opportunity since 1964."
Even though Congress overwhelmingly approved the ERA in 1972 — passing the House 354-to-23 and the Senate 84-to-8 — and the amendment would subsequently be ratified by more than 30 states (but not by the 38 its supporters needed), Schlafly fought the nonsensical Equal Rights Amendment to its death in 1982.
While explaining why the big push for the federal Equal Rights Amendment ultimately failed, in her book Feminist Fantasies Schlafly reprinted some of her old objections: "ERA would put 'gay rights' into the U.S. Constitution because the word in the amendment is 'sex,' not 'women.' Eminent authorities have stated that ERA would legalize the granting of marriage licenses to same-sex couples and generally implement the gay and lesbian agenda."
And guess what? In the latest example of Schlafly's prescience, on Jan. 20, 2006, a Maryland court struck down the state's same-sex marriage ban based on the Old Line State's Equal Rights Amendment. As Jessica Echard, who works with Schlafly at Eagle Forum (the public-policy nonprofit Schlafly heads) points out, "The Maryland ERA language is very similar to the federal ERA, which refers to no discrimination based on 'sex' not 'women,' Using the term 'sex' demands same-sex marriage because banning it would be denying rights based on sex."
Agree or disagree with her politics, Phyllis Schlafly was right — the Hawaii supreme court was the first, in 1993, to rule that its state ERA mandated same-sex marriage.
At the time of the big ERA fight, of course, you might have thought she was nuts. "Hey, Phyllis, your sheet is showing," a Doonesbury cartoon "joked." Famously, during a debate at Illinois State University in 1973, the late feminist mother Betty Friedan angrily declared, "I consider you a traitor to your sex, an Aunt Tom." Friedan said that she wanted to burn Schlafly at the stake. For Schlafly, Friedan's fury came in handy. As Donald T. Critchlow recalls in Phyllis Schlafly and Grassroots Conservatism, Schlafly replied, "I'm glad you said that because it just shows the intemperate nature of proponents of the ERA."
The Schlafly-was-right point about the ERA and marriage is worth noting — not just for historical-accuracy reasons but because the Left keeps trying to revive the old loser. As late as last year, the ERA was reintroduced in both the U.S. House of Representatives and in the Senate.
Sheila Cole, now a senior House staffer, wasn't alive yet when Schlafly was first taking on the ERA, but worked with Schlafly as executive director of Eagle Forum in the late 1990s. Cole remembers, "One of the things I learned from watching Phyllis is that you always have to think like a chess player when dealing with the radical feminists."
Nowadays, Eagle Forum is content that the Equal Rights Amendment is dead as a viable national movement, despite Ted Kennedy's hopes (the ERA is his bill in the Senate) for its revival. Now Schlafly & Co. are more specifically concerned with protecting marriage — in part from the damage done by state ERAs. Meanwhile, when Women's History Month comes around in March, how about a lesson starring a wise woman like Schlafly?
— (c) 2006, Newspaper Enterprise Assn.
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.nationalreview.com/lopez/lopez200602080754.asp
|
||||
Smart lady, wish there were more like her.
I haven't read this but I plan to. Looks like it might be worth a look. If the writer likes Phyllis Schlafly, I probably see eye to eye with her.
I grew up in the 70s and NEVER heard of this woman because of all the liberal teachers I had. It's simply staggering that this woman's accomplishments are not recognized, as opposed to Hillary, who has achieved little or nothing but is extolled as the "smartest woman in the world."
"Nowadays, Eagle Forum is content that the Equal Rights Amendment is dead as a viable national movement, despite Ted Kennedy's hopes (the ERA is his bill in the Senate_"
As you know, to a Liberal a woman is smart who knows how to "stand by her man."
Wait a minute...
Shalom.
The Kennedy's never did care and still does not care for women.
Abortion is nothing more than letting men get off the hook for irresponsible sex.
Women still suffer the effects, whether pregnancy to full term or aborting the child.
"Abortion is nothing more than letting men get off the hook for irresponsible sex.
Women still suffer the effects, whether pregnancy to full term or aborting the child."
The effects of women having irresponsible sex with irresponsible men?
good article.
God bless and keep her.
She made Reagan's Presidency possible.
If you listen to what she has to say weekly you get an excellent education overall.
Is it any wonder that Ann Coulter expounds her virtues?
IN A NUTSHELL:
People fought against the ERA because they said it could be used to legalize gay marriage. They are proven right because the wording of Marylands equal rights law is the same as the ERA's. Because of that wording, the MD Judge said homosexual marriage is legal in MD. The naysayers were wrong-Shaffley was right.
Women still suffer the effects, whether pregnancy to full term or aborting the child."
Precisely so!
Why do you suppose Playboy Magazine has been a big contributor to the feminists who push abortion?
Those women who think have realised that abortion is mens' liberation, not womens'.
Very true.
True but the Feminist always frame the abortion debate as "liberating" women from the burdens of unwanted pregancy.
Conservatives know it's just an convient excuse for irresponble adults to not take responsibility for their actions.
Wow! Can't believe you never heard of Phyllis Schlafy. Only God knows the contribution this lady made to keeping this nation from spiritual and cultural annihilation years ago. God bless Phyllis.
Amen to that!
My comments are misleading - I have heard of her in recent years, but never as a kid taught by angry liberal women in the 70s.
Abortion is the holy grail of feminists and liberals and the only remaining plank of the demoncrat party.
The liberals et al, are really coming unhinged. Wait until Roe comes back to the SCOTUS. They'll be having conniption fits. Have you ever seen one of those, it's not pretty. LOL.
"They'll be having conniption fits. Have you ever seen one of those, it's not pretty. LOL."
Every time I see a NOW or NARAL rally on tv.
Man , are those "womyn" fugly.
Phyllis and many other conservative women have been right about a lot of things. But none has worked harder than Phyllis Schlafley. Women and the conservative movement, owe her a lot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.