Posted on 02/08/2006 5:25:51 AM PST by ovrtaxt
![]() Three undocumented images Danish imams used as examples of anti-Muslim hostility |
Faxed photo, top, and original AP image
Fyi..
the cartoons ive seen on mideast tv are not in your post. man, i can tell you, they were the exact kind that would drive the muslims insane, no, wait, they already are insane. what i meant to say is it would really hit them where it counts. one showed mo with womens breasts. now you know how much they would like a westerner to picture mo as a transsexual? yep, get the matches and knives.
Oh! Gosh!
DANISH IMAMS BUSTED! (Posted a picture of a Pig Squealing Contestant as a Anti-Mohammed pic!)
Alienated Danish Muslims Sought Help from Arabs (DANISH MUSLIM STARTED THE WHOLE THING!)
That is actually what is going on.
So, Imams MIHOP?
Doesn't matter. They have their excuse for rabid behavior, and that's all that counts now.
Someone's got some 'splainin' to do.
A lying moslem "holy" man? What a shocker!
Send the lying bastard back to whatever third world country he came from.
It looks like a good time to be dropping leaflets over the arab world, telling them the truth about their "holy" men and their leaders.
Moslem = liar. I never thought I would become a bigot at my age but I guess I am one now.
Being Muslim means never having to say you're sorry.
Lying is justified in the Koran, as long as it furthers the cause of Islam.
Sick.
I dunno, the one on the left looks pretty accurate.
#1 could have been drawn by anybody, but clearly never appeared in a newspaper; if it were "real", it would be a rough sketch, not the final cartoon--but if it were real, the final cartoon would be available, rather than the sketch. But my gut reaction is that it was drawn by a Muslim. The imagery is precisely that used by Muslims in portraying Jews. It has that magic combination of being heavy-handed and moralistic, yet at the same time ignorant and bigotted that says "Muslim" every time. If it were drawn by a Christian, then I'd say it was drawn in the fifteenth century--but the word "pedophile" hadn't yet been invented then.
On #3, I'll go to my grave before admitting it made me laugh. I mean, it didn't. Not at all. Anyway, it screams "western" to me. For one thing, a Muslim wouldn't have come up with anything that funny (I mean, unfunny), and a Muslim would be unlikely to notice the humorous possibilities in the posture they assume five times a day. They're too used to it.
I'm betting the original for #3 was an Internet photoshop job. Indeed, I'd almost suggest FR or SacredCowBurgers as a source, except that it's too off color and wouldn't be allowed on either site. Also, it SacredCowBurgers prominently watermarks their pics. It might conceivably have been done by a freeper with a taste for obscene humor. Definitely a westerner, anyway.
Yes, #3 absolutely didn't make me laugh either. Not at all.
Photoshop ping!
---------------------------
Fake, but accurate. Paging Dan Rather!
You beat me to it!
Also, as pertains to photo #3 - in the state of Washington - that is not illegal if the animal is consenting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.