Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Democrats' Own History With Race
RealClearPolitics ^ | 2/7/06 | Bruce Bartlett

Posted on 02/07/2006 8:55:38 PM PST by AZRepublican

NAACP Chairman Julian Bond probably spoke for most blacks and liberals last week when he said the Republican Party is equivalent to the Nazi Party.

"The Republican Party would have the American flag and the swastika flying side by side," he told an audience at Fayetteville State University.

Also last week, a new "scientific study" was released showing that Republicans are racist by nature. "The study found that supporters of President Bush and other conservatives had stronger self-admitted and implicit biases against blacks than liberals did," The Washington Post reported.

For decades, it has been a template of the major media that Republicans are the party of racism. It repeats uncritically any charges of Republican racism, no matter how unfounded. Democrats, on the other hand, are always given a pass whenever they commit racist offenses. Even a cursory review, however, will show that the media template is totally contrary to history.

Slavery is the greatest evil ever to beset black people in this country. In the decades leading up to the Civil War, there was intense political debate on what to do about it. The Republican Party was founded in 1854 for the express purpose of ending slavery. The Democratic Party, by contrast, defended it to the bitter end.

Just to show how far Democrats would go to defend slavery, it's worth remembering what happened to Sen. Charles Sumner, Republican of Massachusetts. After giving a speech denouncing slavery in 1856, he was viciously beaten by Rep. Preston Brooks, Democrat of South Carolina, for daring to question the right to own slaves. Being a coward, Brooks waited until the elderly Sumner was seated alone at his desk in the Senate and, without warning, struck him repeatedly with a cane. It took months for Sumner to recover.

In 1858, Sen. Stephen A. Douglas, Democrat of Illinois, debated Republican Abraham Lincoln on the question of slavery. Said Douglas during one of those debates: "For one, I am opposed to negro citizenship in any and every form. I believe this government was made on the white basis. I believe it was made by white men for the benefit of white men and their posterity forever, and I am in favor of confining citizenship to white men, men of European birth and descent, instead of conferring it upon negroes, Indians and other inferior races."

So prevalent were these views in the Democratic Party that Douglas was named its presidential candidate in 1860. Amazingly, Southerners actually viewed Douglas as being too moderate on the slavery issue and instead voted for Vice President John C. Breckinridge, a slave-owner who also ran as a Democrat, thus splitting the pro-slavery vote and allowing Lincoln to win.

After the war, the Democratic Party held a lock on the South for more than 100 years. All of the "Jim Crow" laws that prevented blacks from voting and kept them down were enacted by Democratic governors and Democratic legislatures. The Ku Klux Klan was virtually an auxiliary arm of the Democratic Party, and any black (or white) who threatened the party's domination was liable to be beaten or lynched. Democrats enacted the first gun-control laws in order to prevent blacks from defending themselves against Ku Klux Klan violence. Chain gangs were developed by Democrats to bring back de facto slave labor.

President Woodrow Wilson, the second Democrat to serve since the Civil War, reintroduced segregation throughout the federal government immediately upon taking office in 1913. Avowed racists such as Josephus Daniels and Albert Burleson were named Cabinet secretaries. Black leaders like W.E.B. DuBois, who had strongly supported Wilson, were bitterly disappointed, but shouldn't have been surprised. As president of Princeton University, Wilson refused to admit blacks and as governor of New Jersey ignored blacks' requests for state jobs, even though their votes had provided his margin of victory.

When Franklin D. Roosevelt had his first opportunity to name a member of the Supreme Court, he appointed a life member of the Ku Klux Klan, Sen. Hugo Black, Democrat of Alabama. In 1944, FDR chose as his vice president Harry Truman, who had joined the Ku Klux Klan in Kansas City in 1922. Throughout his presidency, Roosevelt resisted Republican efforts to pass a federal law against lynching, and he opposed integration of the armed forces.

Another Ku Klux Klan member, Sen. Robert C. Byrd, Democrat of West Virginia, personally filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for 14 straight hours to keep it from passage. He is still a member of the U.S. Senate today. As recently as the 1980s, Sen. Ernest Hollings, Democrat of South Carolina, publicly referred to blacks as "darkies" and Hispanics as "wetbacks" without suffering any punishment from his party.

In short, the historical record clearly shows that Democrats, not Republicans, have been the party of racism in this country.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; history; kkk; naacp; race; racebaiting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: AZRepublican

The republicans must reclaim their rightful history. Decades of vicious revisionism on the part of dims must be challenged.


21 posted on 02/07/2006 10:17:05 PM PST by tkathy (Ban the headscarf (http://bloodlesslinchpinsofislamicterrorism.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

ping


22 posted on 02/07/2006 10:50:15 PM PST by Cruz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

ping


23 posted on 02/07/2006 10:50:15 PM PST by Cruz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

Unfortunately, Democrats keep Blacks on their ideological plantation.

They are kept slaves to the Democrat Party, who do them absolutely no good whatsoever.


24 posted on 02/07/2006 11:01:49 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

Wow


25 posted on 02/07/2006 11:24:27 PM PST by Orlando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewels1091
I didn't know Truman was KKK!!!!

I didn't either, but in retrospect, it doesn't surprise me. As a political machine politician in Missouri, in those days, it would have been more likely than not. What *is* surprising, though, was his willingness to integrate the US armed forces, against tremendous resistance fromm all levels. He may have been a member, but he was willing to toss it behind him for the benefit of the nation...

the infowarrior

26 posted on 02/07/2006 11:30:41 PM PST by infowarrior (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

Lincoln's actions speak far louder than his words. I believe there was talk of secession even as early as 1858, and Lincoln's priority--rightfully so--was alway to preserve the union.


27 posted on 02/07/2006 11:44:25 PM PST by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington (How long do we have to pretend that Democrats are patriots?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

Someone with more energy than I have should look up the pary platform of the Nazis and compare it to the Democratic Party's platform.

I thought I was going to get kicked out of my university a few years back when I printed the NSDAP (Nazi Predecessors) platform (1925-9) alongside the DNC's platform. Not identical, exactly, but they seemed to be coming from a similar mindset (The Culture of Death).


28 posted on 02/08/2006 12:16:58 AM PST by Triggerhippie (Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican
Bookmarked!
We need to send this historic fact to all our local newspaper and to all democRATic colleagues and "friends"!!!
29 posted on 02/08/2006 12:34:53 AM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

This is good as far as it goes. But there can not be a complete discussion on this issue without any reference at all to the "Southern Strategy", what it was and was not. It was this that caused the label of racist to be hung around the neck of the Republican party, and the refusal to discuss it is a little disingenuous. It's not that one party is racist and one not, there has been plenty to go around in both. It's just that the dems have successfully shuffled their sins onto Republicans, and can keep on sinning cause no one calls them on it. The idea goes like this, "all the bad dems left to become republicans" Its time to take that on, IMHO.


30 posted on 02/08/2006 6:07:28 AM PST by Kay Syrah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson