Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP outmaneuvered Senate Democrats on Alito (Lib Rantings)
The Morning Call Online ^ | February 7, 2006 | Malcolm J. Gross

Posted on 02/07/2006 2:42:37 PM PST by new yorker 77

The phony drama of Judge Samuel Alito's confirmation has at last staggered to its foregone conclusion. Judge Alito is now Justice Alito. What are we to make of it?

First, as they almost always have done for the past 26 years, Republicans have again outmaneuvered the Democrats. And that is what is really important to both sides, not whether the judge deserves the position.

Using his tried-and-true playbook, President Bush first controlled the process, then set the criteria for approval, and then controlled the semantics. The latter was accomplished, as always, at the start, when Judge Alito was described as a ''conservative.'' The media immediately bought the word and the Democrats were boxed into opposing a conservative judge. Ask anyone for his or her idea of a judge and you are almost certain to get the word ''conservative'' in the first sentence of the definition. ''As sober as a judge,'' the old saying goes.

Judge Alito may have a fine record, but it is not conservative. His whole legal career has been about advocating radical change in established precedents and accepted legal philosophies.

The Senate confirmation process was under White House control from the start. That control was so complete that it was possible to forget that this process was about the Senate using its constitutional power to confirm or reject a nominee. The Senate vote is the only vote we, the people, get on who is a Supreme Court justice.

The White House even set up a ''Murder Board,'' according to the National Law Journal. The board's function was to ''polish'' the nominee so as to make sure no substance came through during the hearings.

....

(Excerpt) Read more at mcall.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitohearings; judicialnominees; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: new yorker 77
I see that Mal Gross bemoans that the DemoRat Senators were incompetent in their questioning of Justice Alito. Maybe the Rats could use some patriotic, America loving, hard working, sober, moral, ethical, intelligent, humble and pleasant Senators that would ask questions for the answers.

But then, they would to a man, vote to confirm Justice Alito. And they wouldn't be DemoRats as well.

21 posted on 02/07/2006 3:10:04 PM PST by Navy Patriot (At times like this, it is a pleasure to support Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Judge Alito may have a fine record, but it is not conservative. His whole legal career has been about advocating radical change in established precedents and accepted legal philosophies.

Just that statement. No examples, no explanation. And Liberals wonder why we don't find them persuasive????

22 posted on 02/07/2006 3:12:57 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

It's hard to ask pertinent questions when you are both illiterate and a fool.


23 posted on 02/07/2006 3:13:33 PM PST by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
The Senate vote is the only vote we, the people, get on who is a Supreme Court justice.

Pretending the above is true (the senate is the people's house!?), then "we, the people" voted to confirm.

24 posted on 02/07/2006 3:13:39 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

And drunk.


25 posted on 02/07/2006 3:18:35 PM PST by Navy Patriot (At times like this, it is a pleasure to support Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
First, as they almost always have done for the past 26 years, Republicans have again outmaneuvered the Democrats. And that is what is really important to both sides, not whether the judge deserves the position.

Justice Judge Bork disagrees with that statement.

Step 2. Find a eminently qualified judge so that neither right nor left can complain about his skills.

Step 3. Train that judge on how to keep cool under fire from idiots (insert 80s movie training montage here).

Step 4. Let Fat Ted mumble in opposition and John Kerry yodel a call for filibuster.

Step 5. Rent a spine for the Republicans in the senate.

26 posted on 02/07/2006 3:25:55 PM PST by KarlInOhio (During wartime, some whistles should not be blown. - Orson Scott Card)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
To libs, its all about process. They can't address the substance of their own views. Rush had a liberal caller from Pennslyvania on today's show and the liberal ended up insulting Rush instead of telling people what he really thought. Bottom line is, you libs not only lack class, you're bullies and you're cowards. You will never see yourself the way other people see you and until you understand what's wrong with you, you will never regain others' respect. Just keep up with the rage and hate. Like Yogi Berra said, its deja vu all over again.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

27 posted on 02/07/2006 3:30:30 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
advocating radical change in established precedents and accepted legal philosophies.

That means he doesn't go along with current fads like citing Zimbabwe or Haiti precedents for suporting something the Constitution does not support.

28 posted on 02/07/2006 3:37:25 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than over here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
Is Bush a witless moron or an evil genius?

He is a witless evil genius.

29 posted on 02/07/2006 3:38:13 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than over here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

30 posted on 02/07/2006 3:52:21 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy (What did Rather know and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Is Bush a witless moron or an evil genius?

Don't know, but he is being opposed by evil morons or a witless genius?


31 posted on 02/07/2006 3:54:37 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
The Senate vote is the only vote we, the people, get on who is a Supreme Court justice.

That's funny, I seem to remember voting in a Presidential election last year.

Elections have consequences.

32 posted on 02/07/2006 3:54:45 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy (What did Rather know and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
I wish they'd get their story straight--Is Bush a witless moron or an evil genius?

Perhaps the greatest talent liberals have is the ability to hold two completely contradictory opinions at the same time.

33 posted on 02/07/2006 3:58:11 PM PST by colorado tanker (We need more "chicken-bleep Democrats" in the Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Using his tried-and-true playbook, President Bush first controlled the process, then set the criteria for approval, and then controlled the semantics.

Yes, that 'playbook' would be the US Constitution, which empowers the President to employ all of these tools in the process.

The latter was accomplished, as always, at the start, when Judge Alito was described as a ''conservative.'' The media immediately bought the word and the Democrats were boxed into opposing a conservative judge.

Is it our fault that Dems are just plain dumb and have no long term rationale other than to simply oppose everything termed 'conservative'? Huh, Malcolm ???

Ask anyone for his or her idea of a judge and you are almost certain to get the word ''conservative'' in the first sentence of the definition. ''As sober as a judge,'' the old saying goes.

Finally said something useful, ehh ?

34 posted on 02/07/2006 4:26:52 PM PST by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
I wish they'd get their story straight--Is Bush a witless moron or an evil genius?
---
He is whatever the liberals need to feel better about themselves at this particular moment. It will change with out notice.
35 posted on 02/07/2006 4:37:32 PM PST by Cheburashka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
He is a witless evil genius.

LOL Perfect.

And the dems are witty good dunces.

36 posted on 02/07/2006 4:55:38 PM PST by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson