Skip to comments.
Venezuela 'could stop oil deliveries to US': Chavez
Deutsche Presse-Agentur ^
| 2/5/2006
| staff
Posted on 02/05/2006 1:51:34 PM PST by wjersey
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Another Castro, but he has some cards to play with.
1
posted on
02/05/2006 1:51:35 PM PST
by
wjersey
To: wjersey
2
posted on
02/05/2006 1:53:18 PM PST
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: wjersey
To the people who accepted the Chavez fuel oil bribe, That's what we call "The other shoe".
3
posted on
02/05/2006 1:53:59 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: wjersey
I warned of this possibility over a year ago.
This is a very serious threat to our nation and one of the primary reasons why President Bush emphasized oil independence in his State of the Union speech last week.
4
posted on
02/05/2006 1:54:17 PM PST
by
Erik Latranyi
(Commonsense liberalism is an oxymoron)
To: wjersey
Like most Communists, he is an economic idiot. If he sells oil to other countries, he will simply free up that much oil from elsewhere for us. He will lose income from Venezuela if he does not sell efficiently, but he won't hurt the U.S. one bit.
It's like the misplaced anger of Americans when we were selling most of our North Slope oil to Japan. Japan simply happened to be an efficient customer to ship to from Alaska. What we sold them freed oil up from other sources that the Japanese had previously been buying, which was handier to our ports.
5
posted on
02/05/2006 1:55:45 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: wjersey
Thank you obstructionist and do nothing politicians and unrealistic environuts you helping place this tin pot dictators' hands around our neck.
To: wjersey
Just words. Oil is fungible. If he sells it into the world market, it hardly matters what its destination is.
7
posted on
02/05/2006 1:55:57 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Erik Latranyi
Bombs, neutron bombs.
All your oil fields are belong to us.
Remember what happened to Carthage when it tried to raise the price of grain sold to Rome?
;-)
8
posted on
02/05/2006 1:56:45 PM PST
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principle)
To: Cicero
Your point is correct even though your facts aren't. We never sold more than 6% of the daily north slope oil production to Asia.
9
posted on
02/05/2006 1:57:20 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Cicero
Yep. And if worse came to worst, we would just buy the same oil from whoever Venezuela sells it to instead of direct.
10
posted on
02/05/2006 1:57:22 PM PST
by
Rastus
To: wjersey
As they say in Texas: "This guy needs killing"!
11
posted on
02/05/2006 1:58:35 PM PST
by
garyhope
(Happy, healthy, prosperous New Year to all good Freepers and our brave military.)
To: wjersey
Didn't he hear we are ADDICTED TO OIL!
That means we get to blow his brains out and then seek treatment, write a children's book, poetry, be on Oprah, do the lecture tour in Europe and Japan, bad mouth our parents and blame society.
12
posted on
02/05/2006 1:58:36 PM PST
by
Berlin_Freeper
(ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
To: wjersey
Chavez is a joke.
To: wjersey
Add this to the mix. A tread from yesterday.
look at how the 35-nation board of governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency voted on the resolution to refer Iran to the U.N. Security Council over its nuclear program, which was approved on a 27-3 vote with five abstentions:
YES: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Belgium, Canada, China, Colombia, Ecuador, Egypt, France, Germany, Ghana, Greece, India, Japan, Norway, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States, Yemen
NO: Cuba, Syria, Venezuela
ABSTAINED: Algeria, Belarus, Indonesia, Libya, South Africa
14
posted on
02/05/2006 2:00:27 PM PST
by
mware
(The keeper of the I's once again.)
To: freeangel
I have been boycotting Citgo for a LONG time...since Chavez started really showing his hand as a tyrant.
And, even though I know that drilling in ANWR or off shore would be a LONG time in actually supplying us with oil...this just illustrates how the dems can affect our foreign policy...and our national security in almost every way.
15
posted on
02/05/2006 2:00:53 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
To: Mike Darancette
\'It would be easy for us to shut all our refineries in the USA,\' It would be easy for us to seize all your refineries in the USA.
To: Erik Latranyi
The timing is interesting.
(1) Chavez and Iran get "buddy buddy".
(2) Iran referred to UN Security Council, fears imminent attack from Israel/US/Allies.
(3) Chavez threatens the US oil supply.
Hmmmmm.
To: wjersey
i could him doing this when the Iran thing heats up...price of oil would go over 100/br
To: wjersey
19
posted on
02/05/2006 2:01:34 PM PST
by
xcamel
(Exposing clandestine operations is treason. 13 knots make a noose.)
To: wjersey
"
Another Castro, but he has some cards to play with."
Still not a full deck.
20
posted on
02/05/2006 2:01:49 PM PST
by
monkeywrench
(Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson