Skip to comments.
Frank Criticizes Condi on Gay U.N. Positions
NewsMax.com ^
| 3 February 2006
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 02/02/2006 7:26:01 PM PST by Aussie Dasher
Democratic Rep. Barney Frank has criticized Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice for her role in the rejection of two international gay civil rights groups by a United Nations body.
Last month, the U.N. Economic and Social Council, a think tank made up of nongovernmental agencies from around the world, voted not to admit the International Lesbian and Gay Association and the Danish Association of Gays and Lesbians.
According to 365Gay.com, their application to join other nongovernmental agencies on the council was rejected without a hearing after the United States voted with some of the world's most repressive regimes, including Iran, Zimbabwe, China, Cameroon and Columbia, to turn down the request.
"I was deeply troubled to learn that the U.S. Government, presumably at your direction, sided with some of the most undemocratic, anti-human rights regimes in the world in voting against consultative status for two international organizations, solely on the grounds that they represent gay and lesbian people," Frank, of Massachusetts, said in a letter to Rice.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 109th; barneyfrank; basementescorts; buttpirate; condi; condirice; ecosoc; homoagenda; homosexualagenda; ilga; ngos; nopoofters; pitcherandcatcher; polesmoker; poofters; rice; rule1; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
This won't hurt Condi in the primaries...
Can anyone tell me if this Frank bloke is in contravention of Rule 1?
To: Aussie Dasher
2
posted on
02/02/2006 7:26:33 PM PST
by
satchmodog9
(Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
To: Aussie Dasher
Gay U.N. PositionsEwwwwww!
3
posted on
02/02/2006 7:27:41 PM PST
by
Onelifetogive
(* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
To: satchmodog9
LOL! It is. I hadn't picked up on that!
4
posted on
02/02/2006 7:27:50 PM PST
by
Aussie Dasher
(The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
To: Aussie Dasher
I was deeply troubled to learn that the U.S. Government, presumably at your direction, sided with some of the most undemocratic, anti-human rights regimes in the worldYou mean like you and your party did when you denounced the invasion of Iraq, Barney?
5
posted on
02/02/2006 7:28:36 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(http://www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com/#quotes)
To: satchmodog9
Now Barney, Muslims don't like gays and we don't want to offend them so get over it. No gays at the UN!
To: satchmodog9
I don't think there's a doubt in anyones mind that Frankie knows all the positions.
7
posted on
02/02/2006 7:29:56 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
To: jazusamo
And if he doesn't his rent boy does.
8
posted on
02/02/2006 7:32:58 PM PST
by
relictele
To: jazusamo
"I don't think there's a doubt in anyones mind that Frankie knows all the positions."
Since he had a homosexual prostitution ring running out of his apartment, he probably is an expert...
9
posted on
02/02/2006 7:33:44 PM PST
by
the lone wolf
(Good Luck, and watch out for stobor.)
To: Aussie Dasher; outofhere2
Barney ought to visit the M.E. alone.
10
posted on
02/02/2006 7:34:58 PM PST
by
ex-Texan
(Mathew 7:1 through 6)
To: Aussie Dasher
11
posted on
02/02/2006 7:35:58 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
To: relictele
Where is it those rent boys come, Thailand?
12
posted on
02/02/2006 7:36:12 PM PST
by
jazusamo
(A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
To: Aussie Dasher
Gays are entitled to the same human rights as everybody else.
This does not entitle them to their own group at the United Nations. Siding with common sense against a move that would hinder future human rights efforts by the United Nations is definitely not comparable to the Democrats siding against freedom in their support of Saddam Hussein's regime.
13
posted on
02/02/2006 7:36:46 PM PST
by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: Aussie Dasher
"Frank Criticizes Condi on Gay U.N. Positions"
70-1=_______________
There's your answer, Barney.
(OK, bad joke.)
14
posted on
02/02/2006 7:44:23 PM PST
by
TheRobb7
(The American Spirit does not require a federal subsidy.)
To: Aussie Dasher
Last month, the U.N. Economic and Social Council, a think tank made up of nongovernmental agencies from around the world, voted not to admit the International Lesbian and Gay Association and the Danish Association of Gays and Lesbians.What does this have to do with Condi? Nothing!!! Smear tatics.
15
posted on
02/02/2006 7:48:20 PM PST
by
jec41
(Screaming Eagle)
To: Texas Eagle
"What's a Barney Frank?" A fudge packing Democrat congress critter from Massoftwoshits.
Semper Fi
16
posted on
02/02/2006 7:52:36 PM PST
by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: Aussie Dasher
I was having a conversation with my barber and he said he couldn't stand Barney Frank and he couldn't look at him when he was speaking because there was something wrong with his mouth.
I said,"It didn't get that way from eating bananas."
He had to put the scissors down while he dried his eyes.
17
posted on
02/02/2006 8:04:12 PM PST
by
Octar
To: coconutt2000
Gays are entitled to the same human rights as everybody else. This does not entitle them to their own group at the United Nations. Siding with common sense against a move that would hinder future human rights efforts by the United Nations is definitely not comparable to the Democrats siding against freedom in their support of Saddam Hussein's regime. Who cares what the Democrats are doing? I couldn't give the slightest ounce of thought to what an effete and gutless party thinks about our involvement in Iraq or gay rights.
However, I do care about allowing all people, regardless of sexuality, equal opportunity for representation. There are already a number of gay and lesbian groups - as well as Christian, Islamic, progressive and conservative groups - on this council, so it defies all reasoning to dismiss without hearing these two specific groups. Let them speak their piece and be torn apart when their weak-willed argument collapse around them.
18
posted on
02/02/2006 8:11:22 PM PST
by
Haemo
To: Texas Eagle
What's a Barney Frank?
a hot dog that returns from the barn smelling like shi'ite?
To: satchmodog9
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson