Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I don't know whether to consider these women very Christian in their behavior - or very stupid.

Opinions or comments anyone?

1 posted on 02/02/2006 2:32:03 PM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MplsSteve

Stockholm syndrome?


2 posted on 02/02/2006 2:35:20 PM PST by No Truce With Kings (The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MplsSteve

Perhaps they want him out so they can get him again, lol


3 posted on 02/02/2006 2:36:01 PM PST by angelsonmyside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MplsSteve
Oh how sweet of them...

Now throw the book at him!

4 posted on 02/02/2006 2:36:14 PM PST by Millee (I've got FRiends in low places..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MplsSteve
I would hate to be in prison and have to explain that I was there because a bunch of beauticians wupped the cr*p out of me.
5 posted on 02/02/2006 2:38:31 PM PST by nomorelurker (wetraginhell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MplsSteve

ROTFLOL!!!

Well, going easy could be up to 50 years in prison instead of 203. Or maybe after taking a look at him they decided he'd had enough. Stitches for 21 cuts? WHOA! And that doesn't count all the other injuries. You go girls. I guess I'd lean towards Christian.


6 posted on 02/02/2006 2:43:34 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MplsSteve

"their victim" ????

Must be some kind of Newspeak.


7 posted on 02/02/2006 2:44:58 PM PST by RWE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MplsSteve

They are not asking for aquittal. They are saying 5 to 10 years. Hey, there are murderers who get out in less than that. Nothing wrong with the victims of a crime having their say in punishment.


8 posted on 02/02/2006 2:45:43 PM PST by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MplsSteve

I will say it again, Women are definitely the most vicious, most vindictive, and most violent of our species. This might not be true very often, but threaten a women or her child and find out what happens. Look at the feminazis, amazons or powerful women throughout history.

Margaret Thatcher to George H. W. Bush: "Don't go soft on me now George"


9 posted on 02/02/2006 2:47:17 PM PST by tricky_k_1972 (Putting on Tinfoil hat and heading for the bomb shelter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MplsSteve

203 years is a bit harsh, 200 years is just about right!


10 posted on 02/02/2006 2:52:25 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (MAY I DIE ON MY FEET IN MY SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MplsSteve

I know Judge Creighton he will not give him the MInimum sentence thats for sure


11 posted on 02/02/2006 2:53:47 PM PST by bayourant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MplsSteve
Okay, I may get flamed for this, but I think the ladies' behavior is very female. Once they'd eliminated the threat, they started empathizing and then sympathizing with the perpetrator. I'll bet they feel partly responsible for the suffering he's about experience, and believe he could be rehabilitated (even, in extreme cases, by the love of a good woman). Not all women would respond this way, of course, but I think a sizeable percentage (maybe 2/3?) would.

Men, even if they thought the sentence was excessive, would be more likely to shrug and say, "Don't do the crime..." Men are more likely to focus on the cause-and-effect of the situation, and less likely to get emotionally involved in it.

12 posted on 02/02/2006 2:54:57 PM PST by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MplsSteve

""Five years, 10 years max," she said. "I think that would be enough time to give a young man time to think about what he did.""

--- Yeah, give the prep enough time to think about getting bullets for the gun

Curious why this "local" story all the way up river in Shreveport is in the New Orleans newpaper. Possible the perp poor displaced Noliner?


15 posted on 02/02/2006 3:42:04 PM PST by Casekirchen (N'orlins has its priorities right, just have to have that annual orgy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson