Posted on 02/02/2006 10:51:37 AM PST by ZGuy
IT'S BOEHNER, 122-109
Boehner? What happened with Roy Blunt? Do you know how many votes each got?
You are SOOOOOOOOO right.
McCain was campaigning for Shadegg.
yup , gettin' their ducks in a row
He was not my first or second choice...
I bet McCain was the kiss of death for Shadegg...
*Snort*
Bainer, not Boner.
His is the best choice. The MSM will not be able to lay a glove on him. Also, he is a conservative.
Through his years of service in the house, John Boehner has often been a bold reformer and an accomplished legislative leader. He’s a solid Midwestern conservative, with a healthy skepticism of government, and that shows in his legislation and his manifesto for leadership. Right now, House Republicans need to put points on the board to win back their own confidence, and that of the base.
The Ohio Congressman also has credentials as a genuine reformer. Back in the dark ages before a House Republican majority, he led the “Gang of Seven” that closed the House Bank, exposed the House Post Office scandal, and ended the House Restaurant’s “dine-and-dash” system. He’s managed to remain largely faithful to the spirit of the 1994 revolution, in spite of his subsequent ascent through the Republican ranks. Boehner cast the same votes as Shadegg on abominations such as the 2002 farm bill and the 2005 highway bill. Unlike many of his colleagues, Boehner does not propose pork-barrel projects that are not necessary for his Ohio congressional district. And like Shadegg, Boehner didn’t know Jack Abramoff and never received a contribution from him.
Another characteristic that is essential in leadership and that has been displayed by Boehner in the past is a streak of stubbornness against the Democratic leadership’s most outrageous acts of partisanship and attack strategies. When no one else would, Boehner acted years ago to hold liberal Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA) accountable for leaking the contents of an illegally-recorded conversation among House leaders. Boehner’s action was taken at great expense to his own self-interest – and his re-election fund, which with FEC approval has financed a lawsuit against McDermott that continues to this day.
"I bet McCain was the kiss of death for Shadegg..."
I am no mccain fan... but mccain campaigned for bush, and it wasn't the kiss of death for him. After all - even a stopped clock is right 2x a day.
He was just rooting for the hometown guy.
I didn't like Boehner at first, but he's a better choice then Delay lackey, Roy Blunt.
Ooops. Just saw the votes at the top. Nevermind!
Blunt 107, Boehner 79, Shadegg 40, Ryun 2 on the first ballot (or so it has been reported).
I actually did like Shadegg's qualities after NRO endorsed him. Mark Levin on his blog (also on NRO) said that behind the scenes, McCain was trying to drum up support for Shadegg, and Mark Levin said "If I was in there I'd write in Tom Delay".
According to Craig Shirley, Bohner is a good choice.
Through his years of service in the house, John Boehner has often been a bold reformer and an accomplished legislative leader. He’s a solid Midwestern conservative, with a healthy skepticism of government, and that shows in his legislation and his manifesto for leadership. Right now, House Republicans need to put points on the board to win back their own confidence, and that of the base.The Ohio Congressman also has credentials as a genuine reformer. Back in the dark ages before a House Republican majority, he led the “Gang of Seven” that closed the House Bank, exposed the House Post Office scandal, and ended the House Restaurant’s “dine-and-dash” system. He’s managed to remain largely faithful to the spirit of the 1994 revolution, in spite of his subsequent ascent through the Republican ranks. Boehner cast the same votes as Shadegg on abominations such as the 2002 farm bill and the 2005 highway bill. Unlike many of his colleagues, Boehner does not propose pork-barrel projects that are not necessary for his Ohio congressional district. And like Shadegg, Boehner didn’t know Jack Abramoff and never received a contribution from him.
Another characteristic that is essential in leadership and that has been displayed by Boehner in the past is a streak of stubbornness against the Democratic leadership’s most outrageous acts of partisanship and attack strategies. When no one else would, Boehner acted years ago to hold liberal Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA) accountable for leaking the contents of an illegally-recorded conversation among House leaders. Boehner’s action was taken at great expense to his own self-interest – and his re-election fund, which with FEC approval has financed a lawsuit against McDermott that continues to this day.
Leadership is not about the day to day petty ideological fights, but about a more elevated level of debate based on conservative principles and not on politics or party.
All three of the men running to become the next House majority leader are capable of doing the job and doing it well. But John Boehner may be the conservative with the most potential to ensure House Republicans capitalize fully on the rare opportunities before them and hopefully return to the important tenets of the Reagan revolution that brought them to power and continues to be the wishes of the American people.
Doesn't exactly sound like "team player" to me.
Good thing or bad thing PD?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.