Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SOTU: FNC (Fox News) Delivers 6.4 Million Viewers For Speech; CNN Has 2.2 Million
TVNewser ^ | Wednesday February 1st, 2006 | Brian Stelter

Posted on 02/02/2006 2:46:44 AM PST by ajolympian2004

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Vaquero

Or, really, any public.


21 posted on 02/02/2006 4:09:12 AM PST by kellynch (I am excessively diverted. ~~Jane Austen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

I've often wondered if these stats include one or more viewers watching the same tv.


22 posted on 02/02/2006 4:12:57 AM PST by SR 50 (Larry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SR 50
I've often wondered if these stats include one or more viewers watching the same tv.

That's another good question. My guess is that multple viewers per TV set tuned in is somehow factored into any statistical analysis that produces these numbers.

You might also ask what about all the folks who viewed the speech from their hotel / motel rooms all across this country.

23 posted on 02/02/2006 4:20:28 AM PST by ajolympian2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: buck61
All the net works really pi** me off with the exception of C-Span

Oh, and C-SPAN wasting the airwaves with the Ramsey Clark/ Cindy Sheahan Impeach Bush get-together doesn't pi** you off?

24 posted on 02/02/2006 4:25:13 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
It is humorous that 2/3 of the viewership didn't bother to watch the Dem response.

2/3 of the viewership know that is nothing more than sour grapes blustering.
25 posted on 02/02/2006 4:26:03 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynch

NO! obviously the fragrant masses. the same folks who wait all morning for Jerry Springer, Regis, and Riki Lake to come on. I don't think I can lump Freepers into this class.


26 posted on 02/02/2006 4:27:59 AM PST by Vaquero (time again for the Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kjobs
"American Idol" boasted 32 million viewers. What a sad commentary on our society!

What else is there to watch? I'd rather watch AI (I don't) than any liberal bilge oozing from my set. I say if the people can't be reasonably informed by the networks, then better they be entertained, if that's entertainment.

27 posted on 02/02/2006 4:31:45 AM PST by InvisibleChurch (As a matter of fact, I AM a religious nut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1,1002,272|99806|1|,00.html

zap2it.com lists the broadcast figures, but they list them as ratio (whatever that means) comparisons, rather than total viewership numbers:

"The big lead-in helped FOX stay in first place at 9 p.m., as its coverage of the State of the Union averaged 6.1/9. CBS was second at 5.2/8, with ABC edging NBC for third (viewers out West saw local programming). "Supernatural" built on its lead-in to score a 3.9/6 for The WB. UPN re-aired last week's "Veronica Mars," which averaged 1.4/2.

"FOX held its lead at 10 p.m., as analysis of the president's speech drew a 4.6/7. CBS averaged 4.1/7 for the hour, followed by ABC, 3.8/6, and NBC, 3.7/6."

28 posted on 02/02/2006 4:44:42 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Regis is still on? I guess morning TV will never, ever change. It's been dull and boring ever since TV was invented.


29 posted on 02/02/2006 5:07:33 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
I think he's the reason.
30 posted on 02/02/2006 5:11:10 AM PST by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

I actually watched a bit of AI the other day. It was funny. That one guy( I don't know his name because I don't keep track or care about actor's names) just humiliates some of those contestants to the point of tears. (It's not like they don't deserve it they are horrible!)


31 posted on 02/02/2006 5:12:53 AM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
If you stuck with CSPIN you missed some wonderful camera shots. They had the best camera angles.

Interestingly enough it was CNN who had the camera for the entire media pool, except for CPSIN, and there were complaints about the screen captures they broadcast......LOL....no doubt the dems were fit to be tied at the shots of her heinous and her antics.

32 posted on 02/02/2006 5:33:24 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
Yes this does pi** me off even more, and the fact that is federally funded. I guess I can't have things my way. I have never liked C-Span programing but a guest on their programing
is not interrupted for adds.
33 posted on 02/02/2006 5:55:12 AM PST by buck61 (luv6060)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1
I love him. I love Bill Sammon too, but Brit's still number 1 with me.

I sent him a condolence card after his son died, and I got a hand-written note back. Talk about class.

34 posted on 02/02/2006 5:58:24 AM PST by kellynch (I am excessively diverted. ~~Jane Austen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004
Well, the only reason I watched Fox after the SOTU was for the brilliance of Brit Hume.. Lately, pretty much all the rest can go eat cheese.
35 posted on 02/02/2006 6:02:10 AM PST by hope (Let no man deceive you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SR 50

fat chrissy matthews stated that msnbc was the most watched network and their coverage was superior. I guess they are keeping him around for the 2008 elections


36 posted on 02/02/2006 6:26:42 AM PST by dubyawhoiluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

This is more viewers than all of the others combined. This should be a wake up for the rest of the MSM that things are changing and are only going to get tougher if they continue with the status quo and the personalities they represent.


37 posted on 02/02/2006 6:30:14 AM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyawhoiluv

Not just "fat chrissy matthews," but also "delusional Chrissy Matthews..."


38 posted on 02/02/2006 6:42:37 AM PST by kellynch (I am excessively diverted. ~~Jane Austen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dubyawhoiluv

The plants look forward to his nightly spraying.


39 posted on 02/02/2006 6:43:59 AM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Timesink; VPMWife78; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; xflisa; ...
FoxFan ping!

(Thanks for the heads up, ajolympian2004)

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

40 posted on 02/02/2006 8:01:04 AM PST by nutmeg (NEVER trust democRATs with our national security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson