Posted on 01/31/2006 10:13:02 PM PST by RWR8189
Something very important is happening in Denmark -- a showdown over freedom, tolerance, and their wolfish menaces in religious clothing. So, please, turn off "American Idol," put down the Game Boy for a moment, and pay attention. This does affect you.
Last October, a Danish newspaper called the Jyllands-Posten published a dozen cartoons of the prophet Muhammad. The illustrations included various depictions of the prophet Muhammad, some innocuous (Muhammad walking in a pasture) and a few with provocative references to radical Islamic terrorism. One showed Muhammad with a bomb in his turban; another had Muhammad wielding a sword in front of two, wide-eyed Muslim women covered in black abayas; another featured a cartoonist hunched over his desk, sweating in fear, as he drew Muhammad in suicide bomb-like apparel.
The newspaper was making a vivid editorial point about European artists' fear of retaliation for drawing any pictures of Muhammad at all. (Remember: It's been a little over a year since Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh was murdered by an Islamist gunman over his movie criticizing violence against women in Islamic societies.) A Danish author had reported last fall that he couldn't find an illustrator for a book about Muhammad; the Jyllands-Posten editors rose to the challenge by calling on artists to send in their submissions and publishing the 12 entries they received in response (available here).
The reaction to the cartoons has resoundingly confirmed the fears those artists expressed about radical Islamic intolerance and violence. In fact, the Jyllands-Posten reported, two of the illustrators received death threats and went into hiding. The Pakistani Jamaaat-e-Islami party placed a 5,000-kroner bounty on the cartoonists' heads. A terrorist outfit called the "Glory Brigades" has threatened suicide bombings in Denmark over the artwork.
Despite how relatively tame the pictures actually are (compared not only to Western standards, but also to the vicious, anti-Semitic propaganda regularly churned out by Arab cartoonists), the drawings have literally inflamed the radical Muslim world and its apologists. Eleven Muslim ambassadors to Copenhagen immediately protested to Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen demanding retractions from the newspaper. The ambassador of Turkey urged Rasmussen to call the Jyllands-Posten to account for "abusing Islam in the name of democracy, human rights and freedom of expression."
Rasmussen, in a rare show of European spine, steadfastly refused to appease the howlers.
As a result, anti-Denmark sentiment has simmered over the last four months, and it boiled over this past week. In Gaza City, masked Palestinian gunmen representing the so-called Religion of Peace raided a European Union office to protest the cartoons. Muslims burned Danish flags and banners depicting Rasmussen (American and Norwegian flags, as well as portraits of President Bush, were thrown into the fire for good measure). A Danish company, Arla Foods, reports that two of its employees in Saudi Arabia were beaten by angry customers. Danish aid workers are evacuating Gaza in fear for their lives.
The country now faces an international boycott from Muslim nations whose fist-clenched protesters led chants this week of "War on Denmark, Death to Denmark" while firing bullets in the air.
Soft-on-terror mouthpieces are blaming the messenger for the conflagration. Former appeaser-in-chief Bill Clinton condemned the cartoons as "appalling" and "totally outrageous." Where was Clinton's condemnation of the gun-wielding, death-threat-issuing, flag-burning bullies of Islam who have targeted Denmark for jihad?
On the Internet, supporters of free speech have launched a "Buy Danish" campaign in solidarity with the nation under siege. But this isn't just about Denmark. American-based Muslim activists are on an angry campaign to stifle the speech of talk show hosts (most recently, KFI morning host Bill Handel in Los Angeles) who offend their sensibilities. And on Tuesday afternoon in advance of the State of the Union address, the Council on American-Islamic Relations issued an ultimatum warning President Bush to "avoid the use of hot-button terms such as 'Islamo-fascism,' 'militant jihadism,' 'Islamic radicalism' or 'totalitarian Islamic empire'" in his speech -- in other words, advising Bush not to identify our enemies for the sake of tolerance and diversity.
First, they came for the cartoonists. Then, they came for the filmmakers and talk show hosts and namers of evil. Next, who knows?
Copyright 2006 Creators Syndicate
bttt
I hadn't heard that CAIR was threatening the President not to mention the enemy by name, for fear of hurting their sensibilities. How outrageous can this pack of murdering scum get! I'm happy that the President made numerous references to radical Islam in the speech, though I wish he'd drop the BS about "a group that has hijacked a great religion." The religion is a murderous cancer on the world body that needs to be excised.
"Radical Islam" were the two most significant words in the SOTU. No pussyfooting "ism" about it, just radical Islam.
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
At a certain point it becomes necessary to abandon illusions and get on w/ kickin' @ss.
I agree with you. Quite frankly, my mouth dropped open when he said that.
I did read somewhere, btw, that the Defense Dept. and various others have been reexamining the initial idea that Islam was just like any other religion, but simply seemed to have a higher than average number of violent flakes, and are looking at the fundamental texts and beliefs to determine how much of the violence and conquest mentality is an integral part of the "religion" itself and if so, how to deal with it.
Of course, Islam is entirely different, being a political system as well as a religion, and having been violent and warlike since day one, so recognizing this would be a step in the right direction and would help us be more realistic about our options.
Note, I am not advocating exterminating all Muslims or anything like that; I am sure there are many for whom it is simply a cultural thing and who have no intention of doing anything other than tending their date groves or smoking their hookahs. But the fundamental direction of Islam is towards violence and domination, and unless Muslims make a conscious decision to change this - in which case it would no longer be Islam, of course - the possibility always exists for Islam to bare its fangs at any moment that it feels strong enough to do so.
Great column. She actually had the GUTS to link to the cartoons, something none of the authors of the many other articles on this matter that have been posted here has done. In each case, and as a public service to the not yet offended Mudslimes, I've provided the appropriate links, if other Freepers haven't provided them before.
There needs to be a war on Islam IN this country.
Every last damn one of them needs to be removed and sent to some Mohammedan crap hole in the Middle East.
They do not belong here.
Is Michelle the one that takes the DUmp to task for their very insane threads about public figures? If so, here's one that someone needs to get to her...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x283528#283553
He jihaded 'til his head exploded..
CAIR is a Trojan Horse that we have, for some reason, let into the USA. Its arrogance is unbounded, with complete support by the forces of PC and the anti-American MSM. Islam seeks our domination, by politics or by violence.
I have three words for all the muslim sissies out there: "Bring it on!" You will regret the day one of your cowardly, misogynous ilk detonate a suicide bomb in an American city. It will be open season on muslims, with no bag limit...
oh the horror
Carlsberg from now on, it's a great beer.
I love both Malkin's and Coulter's work, but I'm the opposite
of you. I don't find Ann that attractive, while I think Michelle
is absolutely gorgeous.
I finally found her contact info. She could really have fun with it, if it doesn't get deleted first. I really should learn to do a screen cap.
Great article and a real heads up on the "religion of peace" that we'll be sure NOT to hear on the alphabet nightly news. (I wonder how Hillary would look in a Burka? ...Better?). :-/
Thanks for the ping.
Here's your reference
The Pentagon Breaks the Islam Taboo--Islam is an ideological engine of war
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1540139/posts
Malkin, as usual, is brilliant.
FYI
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.