Posted on 01/31/2006 12:16:29 PM PST by sofaman
Savor the moment...Happy Alitomus!!!!
Join in the celebration as the Democrats implode...
Not sure that I'm familiar with the "Religious Left". Can you give examples? I'm not sure I could identify any "big government zealots who consider themselves conservatives".
Sean is not the BEST voice- or the sharpest voice for conservatives...but he is not ruthless.....
he doesn't take head-on attacks as well as I wish he would...he dances at times when pressured...he also allows libs to take him on bunny trails....
but he is not ruthless.....
"Both Sean and a great number of Liberals are crybabies.
liberals are notorious for being childish."
Is this a valid syllogism? Sean & Liberals are crybabies, Liberals are notorious for being childish, therefore Sean is childish?? Is that what you're trying to say?
Anyone seen my wooden spoon?
Rush is MUCH better on the intellectual level....
still wondering why you think Sean is ruthless, and what you mean by BIG Gov't "conservatives...
You mean like conservatives that want to control women's "reproductive rights"
and want to see Bush SPY on innocent American citizens? those "conservatives"?
Does that make Sean one of those "Religious Left" "Big Government Zealots" "Conservatives" who is also an undercover "tool for the Republican Party"? Wow, he must be pretty darn smart to be able to keep all those positions straight!!
don't forget ruthless... he is childish, petty and ruthless too......
Thanks!! I knew I'd forget something!
well with such a long list...of course you had to forgtet something....
LOL!
I sure can't keep up with the laundry list of new labels...
Ah, then I think you have your left and your right confused! I think it's the Religious Right that you're thinking of, and I don't think their plan is to have Big Government impose prayer on kids, or tell people how to live their lives. They are only trying to point out that the constitution provides for freedom OF religion, not FROM religion, so they want Big government not to restrict their kids from praying, or insisting on how their children are taught about sex. Hardly prudes, but then the example you gave, Rick Santorum isn't a prude either. But, you have definitely exposed yourself as the Troll we all assumed you to be. Now head back to DU like a good little troll!
LOL!
was that a spanking?
I think that was a spanking!
CHRISTIANHELLRAISER....does your backside hurt?
I don't post to KNOWN trolls....Post 152 will be my last acknowledgement of you. Have a nice day.
FOFL!!!
BTW ... did ya just here the Grape Vine .. about staffers on the Hill being banned from making edits on Wikipedia
That they were taking factually bad things out about their bosses off and adding glowing good things
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
ahhhhh and you do get to worship God in your own personal way... and so do other Americans....
I am certainly a religious zealot....I have no desire to force anyone to pray.. that is the Muslim terrorists...you know the ones that just told Bush if he converted to Islam they wouldn't kill innocent people anymore...
as for homosexuality.....hmmmm no desire to make it ILLEGAL...just not interested in it being SHOVED down my throat and called a homophobe if I stick to MY WAY TO WORSHIP GOD-- MY OWN PERSONAL WAY.......
don't want schools teaching my kids about sex... don't want them teaching kids about how to make an atomic bomb either...both require maturity and responsibility that children and teens do not possess.....
but you are so fun.....you really think all that dribble you spout.....sad.....for you...
I heard that!
LOL!!
I DIDN'T HEAR THAT! LOL!
pathetic! LOL!
talk about CENSORSHIP!
YIKES!
http://www.stltoday.com/blogs/business-talking-tech/2006/01/congress-alters-facts-on-wikipedia/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.