Skip to comments.
U.S. Brings Back the .45
Strategy Page ^
 | January 27, 2006
Posted on 01/29/2006 11:14:04 AM PST by John Jorsett
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-380 next  last
To: Bob
    Is a hydra-shock the same? Now that I have my pistol permit to carry I use the .32cal version ...
 
41
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:41:29 AM PST
by 
SkyDancer
("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad - Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
 
To: SampleMan
42
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:41:33 AM PST
by 
ASA Vet
(Those who know don't talk, those who talk don't know.)
 
To: Vaquero
    ......(ever shoot a .454 Casull or a .44 magnum for that matter. .45 ACP is a cakewalk in comparison) LOL! Very True! Very True!
 
43
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:41:43 AM PST
by 
Fiddlstix
(Tagline Repair Service. Let us fix those broken Taglines. Inquire within(Presented by TagLines R US))
 
To: MonroeDNA
    Seems to me that a .357 SIG or .40 would be better. Lighter ammo, higher capacity, and heck of a punch. Flatter shooting, too.I agree. But (referring to above post) I'm just a pansie wussy pussy who likes his Sig P226 9mm for self defense. Series, I'd have gone for the .40 S&W years before the caliber was developed and therefore bought a Browning HiPower in 9mm. I have so many rounds of 9mm that I didn't want to introduce a new "flavor" in my inventory mix. Ergo, I bought the P226 last year in 9mm.
 
44
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:42:25 AM PST
by 
Cobra64
 
To: RichardW
    Wow! Thank you Mr. Hyperbole!
 
45
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:42:30 AM PST
by 
Uriah_lost
(http://www.wingercomics.com/d/20051205.html)
 
To: John Lenin
    not necessary at handgun ranges and the guns can be made much more accurately than the original 1911, which as anyone knows has been made very accurate in guns like the colt Gold Cup. 
 
I own a WWII 1911A1 Remington Rand....always shoots, never jams and up to 25 yards is a guaranteed man killer (not pretty groups but good enough) further away than that and you should have your Rifle or Carbine out and ready.
 
46
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:42:32 AM PST
by 
Vaquero
(time again for the Crusades.)
 
To: RichardW
    I'd rather use a 22.
 especially if you have 100 rounds in a helical magazine. A .22 is larger in diameter than an ice pick. Does anyone think that getting several punctures from an ice pick are nothing to worry about? How about 20 or 30? 
 Rate of fire, boys and girls. Rate of fire. 
 Way back when the old arquebus (matchlock) used in the 30 years war in the mid 1600s was an .80 caliber monster. Give me a .22 pistol with large capacity mag over one of those single shot (and horribly innacurate) monsters any day. Of course a pump shotgun with extended capacity would be even better. 
 Now, the ideal is a reasonably large caliber round with accuracy, capacity and stopping power. A modern .45 should do just fine. 
 Though I do have a fondness for the extremes: 

 The "F" in BFR is supposed to stand for "finest." Yeah, and the "Fs" in BUFF really stands for "fat fellow."
 
47
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:42:43 AM PST
by 
Phsstpok
(There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
 
To: John Lenin
    Just change the bullet to a hollow point and the 9mm would do the trick. Please continue to dazzle us with your exquisite brilliance and unmatched expertise.
 
To: John Jorsett
    Awesome move to improve our soldiers killing power on those who would kill our troops. Lock and load BUMP!!
 
To: RichardW
    Darn, my picture of the Calico .22 showed up fine in preview. Sorry about that.
 
50
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:44:00 AM PST
by 
Phsstpok
(There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
 
To: John Lenin
    Beg to differ: Here is a pix of my protector 
 Great big ole S&W .357
158 grain hollowpoints.
 More killing power than a .45ACP
 
51
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:44:13 AM PST
by 
76834
(There's nothing wrong with sobriety in moderation.)
 
To: RichardW
    I had a brandy-new Beretta when I was in college back in the 60s. It was a POS... as was the Walther... constant mis-feeds and jamming. Even with round ball ammo.
 
52
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:44:31 AM PST
by 
Cobra64
 
To: jess35
    not the penetration or stopping power you need in war (just ask the Germans during WW 1 whose puny Lugers were no match for the 1911....they wanted them banned by the geneva convetion). Now the .38 super...now thats a .355" bullet that will do some damage.
 
53
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:44:50 AM PST
by 
Vaquero
(time again for the Crusades.)
 
To: John Jorsett
    I tend to think less highly of the Glock .45 and .40 s. There have been disturbing reports of a fair number of Kb's in those calibers. (Kb's = Kaboom!!!). The probable cause is lack of case support near the case web. Glock has made at least 3 alterations on the Quiet to the design of the barrel to address the issue but has refused to publicly acknowledge that there is a problem. I only know of 1 Kb in a glock 9mm. The 9mm glock barrel design is definitely Superior to the design of the .45 and .40 barrels. Incidentally these are factory ammo Kb's not with reloads.
54
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:45:17 AM PST
by 
ghostcat
 
To: John Jorsett
    I like my Glock 10mm. :-)
 
55
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:46:13 AM PST
by 
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
 
To: 76834
    ABSOLUTELY!!! .357 MAG RULES....makes the 9mm look enemic. Loaded with the light 125gr hollow points and you will flip your opponent...with the 158 gr rounds youll kill them through cars.....
 
56
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:47:00 AM PST
by 
Vaquero
(time again for the Crusades.)
 
To: John Jorsett
    About time...one shot of a 45 is all it takes. The 9mm just doesn't do the job...one shot many times doesn't slow 'em down.
 
57
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:47:14 AM PST
by 
shield
(The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
 
To: DTogo
    It was a standard issue M1911 .45 out of the armory. That explains it. The M1911's the military had were not made after 1945. That is, the military did not procure any new M1911's after 1945. So what you were shooting was a gun that had been used and abused for many years and was probably rebuilt once or twice. It was half worn out. A new 1911 or an old one that had not seen so much use should be accurate enough.
 
58
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:48:54 AM PST
by 
Wilhelm Tell
(True or False? This is not a tag line.)
 
To: ncountylee
    Would not trade my M1911 .45 for another gun, period.Neither would my hubby. He swears by his.
 
59
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:49:35 AM PST
by 
processing please hold
(Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
 
To: John Lenin
    "You lose accuracy with a heavier round."
  
 Hogwash!!! many of the paper punchers prefer the .45 over the smaller rounds because of its accuracy.
60
posted on 
01/29/2006 11:49:36 AM PST
by 
ghostcat
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-380 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson