Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pitt Professor's Theory of Evolution Gets Boost From Cell Research [Sudden Origins]
University of Pittsburgh ^ | 26 January 2006 | Staff

Posted on 01/26/2006 11:47:13 AM PST by PatrickHenry

Jeffrey H. Schwartz's Sudden Origins closed Darwin's gaps; cell biology explains how.

An article by University of Pittsburgh Professor of Anthropology Jeffrey H. Schwartz and University of Salerno Professor of Biochemistry Bruno Maresca, to be published Jan. 30 in the New Anatomist journal, shows that the emerging understanding of cell structure lends strong support to Schwartz's theory of evolution, originally explained in his seminal work, Sudden Origins: Fossils, Genes, and the Emergence of Species (John Wiley & Sons, 2000).

In that book, Schwartz hearkens back to earlier theories that suggest that the Darwinian model of evolution as continual and gradual adaptation to the environment glosses over gaps in the fossil record by assuming the intervening fossils simply have not been found yet. Rather, Schwartz argues, they have not been found because they don't exist, since evolution is not necessarily gradual but often sudden, dramatic expressions of change that began on the cellular level because of radical environmental stressors-like extreme heat, cold, or crowding-years earlier.

Determining the mechanism that causes those delayed expressions of change is Schwartz's major contribution to the evolution of the theory of evolution. The mechanism, the authors explain, is this: Environmental upheaval causes genes to mutate, and those altered genes remain in a recessive state, spreading silently through the population until offspring appear with two copies of the new mutation and change suddenly, seemingly appearing out of thin air. Those changes may be significant and beneficial (like teeth or limbs) or, more likely, kill the organism.

Why does it take an environmental drama to cause mutations? Why don't cells subtly and constantly change in small ways over time, as Darwin suggests?

Cell biologists know the answer: Cells don't like to change and don't do so easily. As Schwartz and Maresca explain: Cells in their ordinary states have suites of molecules- various kinds of proteins-whose jobs are to eliminate error that might get introduced and derail the functioning of their cell. For instance, some proteins work to keep the cell membrane intact. Other proteins act as chaperones, bringing molecules to their proper locations in the cell, and so on. In short, with that kind of protection from change, it is very difficult for mutations, of whatever kind, to gain a foothold. But extreme stress pushes cells beyond their capacity to produce protective proteins, and then mutation can occur.

This revelation has enormous implications for the notion that organisms routinely change to adapt to the environment. Actually, Schwartz argues, it is the environment that knocks them off their equilibrium and as likely ultimately kills them as changes them. And so they are being rocked by the environment, not adapting to it.

The article's conclusions also have important implications for the notion of “fixing” the environment to protect endangered species. While it is indeed the environment causing the mutation, the resulting organism is in an altogether different environment by the time the novelty finally escapes its recessive state and expresses itself.

“You just can't do a quick fix on the environment to prevent extinction because the cause of the mutation occurred some time in the past, and you don't know what the cause of the stress was at that time,” Schwartz said.

“This new understanding of how organisms change provides us with an opportunity to forestall the damage we might cause by unthinking disruption of the environment,” added Schwartz. “The Sudden Origins theory, buttressed by modern cell biology, underscores the need to preserve the environment-not only to enhance life today, but to protect life generations from now.”

Schwartz, with his colleague Ian Tattersall, curator of anthropology at the American Museum of Natural History in New York, also authored the four-volume The Human Fossil Record (Wiley-Liss, 2002-05). Together, the volumes represent the first study of the entire human fossil record. Volume 1 was recognized by the Association of American Publishers with its Professional Scholarly Publishing Award. In 1987, Schwartz's The Red Ape: Orang-utans and Human Origin (Houghton Mifflin Company) was met with critical acclaim.

Schwartz, who also is a Pitt professor of the history and philosophy of science, was named a fellow in Pitt's Center for the Philosophy of Science and a fellow of the prestigious World Academy of Arts and Science.

The journal, The New Anatomist, is an invitation-only supplement to the Anatomical Record.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: crevolist; origins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-349 next last
To: Luis Gonzalez

Nice to see you too, Luis.


161 posted on 01/28/2006 10:04:59 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
General Ripper alert!

Missed it..... how long was the troll around?

162 posted on 01/28/2006 10:07:53 AM PST by longshadow (FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: longshadow

He wasn't around very long. Check out 156 to see what you missed.


163 posted on 01/28/2006 10:12:28 AM PST by PatrickHenry (True conservatives revere Adam Smith, Charles Darwin, and the Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
You're so far over his head...

Trying to understand tends to beat trying not to.

164 posted on 01/28/2006 10:42:10 AM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Posts nuked as well. Which tends to mean "cabouth" has been with us before.

Actually, this site doesn't like posts calling for rebellion, either.

165 posted on 01/28/2006 11:44:16 AM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; VadeRetro
It seems that "cabouth" is no longer with us.

After I posted, I hit abuse (for the first time) and said it sounded like classic anti-Semitism.

166 posted on 01/28/2006 12:00:08 PM PST by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Wow!

Now that's a conspiracy theory. When I got to:

"The Myth of “Disease”: Copper deficiency is responsible for virtually EVERY “disease” and symptoms manifesting now, accelerating aging, and death. Parkinson’s, MS, mental depression, diabetes, autism, ADD, pancreatic, digestive problems, low hormone production, Cystic Fibrosis, bone & muscle degenerative conditions, shortened lifespan, and the list goes on. These things happen gradually over time, so we do not suspect we are slowly being poisoned."

I nearly fell out of my chair laughing.....

Of course, there was a another Freeper a few months ago who claimed that the very same list of illnesses were caused by some OTHER conspiracy, so it would have been entertaining to have seen the two of them face off with each other; a sort of duelling Conspiracy Theories, as it were.

167 posted on 01/28/2006 12:38:56 PM PST by longshadow (FReeper #405, entering his ninth year of ignoring nitwits, nutcases, and recycled newbies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Shapiro's studies perhaps may have provided the very type of unrealistic forced lab environment most condusive to permitting mutations and encouraging the vitality of mutants.

Was that a "If a frog had a glass ass..?" comment?

P.S. I think your comment "more complex organisms have even more magnitudes of layers to fight off mutations." is akin to the Federal government calling my pencil eraser a federal tool to fight corruption when I use it to fix an error on my 1040.

168 posted on 01/28/2006 12:42:37 PM PST by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC

Akin to an immune system is the ticket.


169 posted on 01/28/2006 1:20:53 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
OTH, there is Wilson's disease.

Another reason for zinc in the diet.

170 posted on 01/28/2006 1:24:01 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Akin to an immune system is the ticket.

Hmm. And here I thought the immune system fought off intruders not mutations.

171 posted on 01/28/2006 1:31:17 PM PST by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC

Hmmm and hmmmm, Andrew. Go read up on auto-immune disorders.


172 posted on 01/28/2006 1:52:14 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Hmmm and hmmmm, Andrew. Go read up on auto-immune disorders.

Auto immunity is a malfunction, not a protection against mutation. For instance.... Sometimes the process breaks down and the immune system attacks self-cells. This is the case of autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and some forms of arthritis and diabetes.

173 posted on 01/28/2006 2:16:35 PM PST by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC

The immune system also fights and assists the fight against mutations. Also other major systems in the organism help fight off the bad effects of mutations, such as the renal and lymphatic systems acting to remove toxins, and other systems provide the resources the immumne system needs-- such as the bone struture providing a housing for the bone marrow which creates the immune agents for delivery and patroling via the blood.


174 posted on 01/28/2006 2:29:15 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

"I do deny them my essence." placemark


175 posted on 01/28/2006 2:35:07 PM PST by dread78645 (Intelligent Design. It causes people to misspeak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: dread78645; AndrewC

The immune system and adjuncts are obviously designed and intended to fight off infection, to remove dead, grossly malfunctioning, and unrepairably broken cells, as as such removes or isolates mutant cells and cell groups.


176 posted on 01/28/2006 2:38:42 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: bvw
The immune system also fights and assists the fight against mutations.

As I stated, as much as my pencil eraser fights and assists the fight against federal corruption.

177 posted on 01/28/2006 2:43:03 PM PST by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC

Just to hilight the point of subdiscussion here ... You seem to have put forth an assertion that Shapiro's claim that he has observed high rates of surviving mutants in single celled organisms discounts Schwartz's claim that cells STRONGLY resist mutation. Do I have that correct?


178 posted on 01/28/2006 2:49:00 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: bvw
You seem to have put forth an assertion that Shapiro's claim that he has observed high rates of surviving mutants in single celled organisms discounts Schwartz's claim that cells STRONGLY resist mutation. Do I have that correct?

Nope. They both claim (I believe correctly so) that cells strongly resist mutation. Shapiro (and now apparently Schwartz) claim that the mutations are in response to external stimuli and are not just accidental.

179 posted on 01/28/2006 3:09:40 PM PST by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC

And what is your argument or agreement with Shapiro and Schwartz? I am unclear as to the point you were attempting to make by bringing in Shapiro's work.


180 posted on 01/28/2006 3:25:14 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-349 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson