Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel Ponders Response After Hamas Win
AP ^ | 1/26/06 | ARON HELLER

Posted on 01/26/2006 9:07:40 AM PST by dervish

Israeli officials convened emergency meetings on Thursday to decide how to respond to the militant Hamas group's upset victory in Palestinian elections, maintaining an outward silence while privately blaming each other for the upheaval.

Hamas' stunning showing in Wednesday's vote could send tremors through Israel's own political establishment ahead of March elections by bolstering hawks who oppose territorial concessions to the Palestinians.

'snip'

"After Hamas is elected, can the world not talk to them?" former Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom told Army Radio. "The world will speak to them saying that they were elected in a democratic process ... I think if we had prevented them from participating in the elections this wouldn't have happened."

'snip'

"Likeliest to suffer is Kadima, the centrist party Ariel Sharon formed in November, after breaking away from Likud, to seek more leeway in setting Israel's final borders. Kadima maintained a strong lead in pre-election polls, even after Sharon was incapacitated by a stroke.

Likud's leader, former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, warned that Hamas' dramatic election victory would turn the Palestinian Authority into a radical, Islamic regime."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: arielsharon; ehudolmert; fatah; hamas; hamastan; israel; jihad; kadima; likud; netanyahu; paelection; palestinian; teror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Two points.

1) Hello Likud/Netanyahu bye bye Kadima/Olmert

2) President Bush appears to be taking the stand recommended by Natan Sharansky -- allow democracy and let the people suffer their choices. President Bush has reiterated his stand not to deal with the terrorist Hamas. May his resolve hold fast.

1 posted on 01/26/2006 9:07:44 AM PST by dervish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson; Alouette; Convert from ECUSA; Do not dub me shapka broham; SunkenCiv

fyi


2 posted on 01/26/2006 9:11:21 AM PST by dervish (Hamastan " the step-child of Iran and the Taliban")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dervish

We talk to governments that do terrible things all the time - we had contact with the U.S.S.R. all through the cold war and we talk to Cuba and North Korea, heck we talked to the Taliban before we invaded Afghanistan.

I think is actually good to have hamas elected - now we know for sure the will of the Palestinian people and we can treat them accordingly. The first step should be to cut off aid and to state that attacks by Hamas are now acts of war.


3 posted on 01/26/2006 9:13:13 AM PST by gondramB (Democracy: two wolves and a lamb voting on lunch. Liberty: a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dervish

If a people freely elects terrorism, they freely elect to be legitimate targets of war.


4 posted on 01/26/2006 9:15:23 AM PST by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington (How long do we have to pretend that Democrats are patriots?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dervish

I know it's drastic but since the Israelis have now separated the Jews from the Palistinians into different areas, why not simply take out the entire Gaza "hood" and blow all those thugs to smithereens? It would benefit the entire middle east and the world, once and for all.


5 posted on 01/26/2006 9:17:06 AM PST by goresalooza (Nurses Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington

"If a people freely elects terrorism..."

I'm not sure they elected terrorism as much as they rejected the corruption and incompetence of Fatah. Admittedly their choice is not a great one, but I'm not sure there was a better option available.

There was a good piece on NRO today advancing the theory that Hamas did not actually want to win, just get a big enough minority to push the rest of the gov't around.


6 posted on 01/26/2006 9:31:36 AM PST by jocon307 (The Silent Majority - silent no longer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dervish

Agreed, and BTW, why are the only ones "stunned" the media?

FR was not stunned in the least.


7 posted on 01/26/2006 9:33:51 AM PST by roses of sharon ("I would rather men ask why I have no statue, than why I have one". ) (Cato the Elder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
The first step should be to cut off aid

I agree with that! But, as you may have seen, Jimmah Carter has come out with a statement to the effect that "With the good news of a Hamas win, our first step should be to send them lots of money."

Words fail.

8 posted on 01/26/2006 9:35:38 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

If you reject incompetence for terrorism, you freely elect terrorism. Time to turn Hamasistan into a parking lot.


9 posted on 01/26/2006 9:36:04 AM PST by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington (How long do we have to pretend that Democrats are patriots?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dervish

Israel's response should be to elect Netanyahu's Likud Party and throw out the Kadima Party. It's yesterday's news.


10 posted on 01/26/2006 9:54:08 AM PST by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

"There was a good piece on NRO today advancing the theory that Hamas did not actually want to win, just get a big enough minority to push the rest of the gov't around. "

I could not find that piece, help??

"I'm not sure they elected terrorism as much as they rejected the corruption"

Polls have consistently shown vast Palestinian support for terror.

Hamas will be equally corrupt. Al Qaeda and Islamists have not done any better on good governance. Afghanistan was no better off under the Islamists. Yes, the Islamists spend on education - the better to indoctrinate young minds.


11 posted on 01/26/2006 9:56:42 AM PST by dervish (Hamastan " the step-child of Iran and the Taliban")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

"The election of Hamas is an extraordinary opportunity to move the peace process forward."

12 posted on 01/26/2006 9:57:14 AM PST by zarf (It's time for a college football playoff system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dervish

There's been a lot of spin today from people claiming this is actually a GOOD thing because now Hamas is a government agent and force can be brought to bear on the Palestinians with more legitimacy if terrorist attacks continue to occur in Israel.

Frankly, I think this is a weak argument. This is a horrible thing for Hamas to be in power, and it doesn't give Israel any greater "legitimacy" in retaliation than it did before - and the reason is this: Most of the world will continue to blame Israel and hold Israel as the villain, even if a Hamas-run government is found to be outfitting kids wish bomb vests and sending them into Tel Aviv. Either way, Israel will be punished. What's worse is the potentially unifying legitimacy Hamas will have in the eyes of the Palestinian people. Everyone among the Palestinians agree that Israel must be destroyed. Any rifts between Fatah and Hamas are EASILY trumped by that common goal. It's one thing for a terrorist outfit to blow the bugle as a call to arms of the Palestinian people. It's another thing when that terrorist group is your freely elected government, which goes a long way to manifesting an identity for the Palestinian street.

The greater risk, in my opinion, is that Hamas will become Iran't proxy in Gaza as Hezbollah is in Lebanon. Further, I fear the radicalization of the Palestinian street beyond the usual rabble of rock-throwers - a kind of patriotism that concedes that despite Hamas' penchant for blowing up fellow Palestinians, heck, it worked. They're in power. Let's do the same.


13 posted on 01/26/2006 10:02:07 AM PST by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dervish

Agreed - democracy does not always bring to power the most enlightened leaders (Hitler and Mussolini were elected by strong majorities). Since it is now US policy not to interfere with elections (except for Clinton, who sent his boy Carville to Israel to ensure Barak's win) we need to live with the results.

My concern is that Bush will back off the US position that US will not do business with Hamas because it is a terrorist organization that sponsors terrorism.


14 posted on 01/26/2006 10:06:42 AM PST by KingofZion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

Thanks for your thoughtful comments.

It remains to be seen how corrupt/gullible the world and the Israeli left is and whether this results in a turning back of the clock.

Since 1957 the world at large recognized that the PLO and Fatah were terrorist organizations without legitimacy. In 1974 this began to change with Arafat's appearance at the UN, his English statements on Israel's right to exist and his courting of world public opinion. His was a consummate PR coup with an oil hungry world anxious for appeasement.

This fake legitimacy reached its pinnacle and began to fall after 2003, the second Intifadah, the Karine A exposure and the subsequent pariah treatment by Pres Bush and PM Sharon exposing Arafat for the corrupt terrorist he always was. The Palistinian cause has not recovered even after Arafat's death.

"The greater risk, in my opinion, is that Hamas will become Iran't proxy in Gaza as Hezbollah is in Lebanon. Further, I fear the radicalization of the Palestinian street beyond the usual rabble of rock-throwers - a kind of patriotism that concedes that despite Hamas' penchant for blowing up fellow Palestinians, heck, it worked. They're in power. Let's do the same."

You have hit on the other important variable -- whether Hamas brings increased ties with Iran/Hezbollah and Al Qaeda as I believe they will. What appears to be happening right now is that the lines are becoming clearer which was part of Pres Bush's plan ("with us or against us"). Even France has come out with a strong threat to Iran and a tough stance on Syrian interference in Lebanon. So this radicalization has a value.



15 posted on 01/26/2006 10:23:31 AM PST by dervish (Hamastan " the step-child of Iran and the Taliban")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dervish

Ponder Israel and then surrender some more.

How much was the Sharon family paid to be Hamas' campaign managers?

How could any Arab not vote for Hamas after they succeeded in chasing Israel our of Gaza?

Bush and Rice should also get something.


16 posted on 01/26/2006 10:27:39 AM PST by Sabramerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dervish
Well . . . they could simply expel the hostile non-Jewish population out of the G-d-given Jewish Homeland . . .

Oh my. How silly of me.

17 posted on 01/26/2006 10:27:43 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Shallach 'et `ammi veya`avduni!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingofZion
My concern is that Bush will back off the US position that US will not do business with Hamas

Concern? I'll bet you on it.

Only question is hours, days, weeks, or months?

18 posted on 01/26/2006 10:29:26 AM PST by Sabramerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dervish

Lots of variables to consider. At some point the curtain has to come down on these clowns. I don't know if we're just delaying the inevitable, or getting our ducks in a row to ensure a total victory over radical Islam...


19 posted on 01/26/2006 10:32:51 AM PST by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

The election blew away the sham peace negotiations that were causing Israel to be prodded mercilessly into giving up "land for peace." Now, Hamas doesn't want to negotiate, and the road map is dead. The more I think about this, if they don't want to negotiate, and their charter which they promise not to denounce is built on destroying Israel, this could be construed as an ipso facto declaration of open hostilities -- war.


20 posted on 01/26/2006 10:37:54 AM PST by Flavius Josephus (Enemy Idealogies: Pacifism, Liberalism, and Feminism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson