ANN COULTER: Abortion Stops a Bleeding Heart

Human Events Online ^ | January 25, 2006 | Ann Coulter

[Forgiven_Sinner]

"His claim: it's not a human yet. It's a fetus. So while there is definitely a moral issue at the heart of the debate I think it is more lack of basic logic that lets liberals hold a lot of their positions, including the abortion one. Someone trained in logic might ask these questions: 1) is a fetus human life (if not, what is it?) 2) is human life sacred and deserving of protection under law ? 3) QED a fetus is sacred and deserving of protection under law. "

That's similar to my arguments, only I add, "If it's not human what species is it?" and "What kind of DNA does it have?" "If it has human DNA, it is a human being. QED"

[Wasanother]

The RATS have even gone beyond partial birth abortions and are now claiming it's the woman's right to have a chainsaw abortion.

[Salvation]

and the dims are losing all their births of bleeding hearts.

[investigateworld]

bttt

[Tim Long]

I don't really get how the title makes sense.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[Rembrandt]

"I don't think Howard Dean is going to follow that, so there may be a power struggle in the DNC."

I understand the DNC is courting a new leader, some guy in Pakistan named Usama something.

[Rembrandt]

"The dims may go down with the ship rather than throw this issue overboard."

There is always a chance that this will be a grand slam HR for the GOP with the Dim potty splintering into two or more parties, one the traditional Dims (whatever the Hell that means) and then, of course, the anti-war but kill the babies party.

[Rembrandt]

"Bush won 23 of the top 24 states with the highest birth rate. They all were blue.

Kerry won 16 states with the lowest birth rate. they all were red."

You've got the colors reversed. Blue=The Traitor and Coward, Red=Our President.

[Dustbunny]

The right to an abortion is not mentioned in the Constitution. It should be a state issue, not a federal issue

[HiTech RedNeck]

It's EEEEEEEEEEEEEEvolution.

[Ditter]

No I don't. I think I read it here on FR but I could be mistaken about that.

[SpookBrat]

read later

[MHGinTN]

BINGO! The prevalent sign of the deadly disease known as Liberalism.

[chesley]

Well, you might be right, but I think illegal immigration is driven by a desire for American employers to underpay their workers.

Still, we are on the same side of the abortion issue. We don't have to fight. It's not an either/or situation. If it were, we would have to choose which is more important, and I might come down on your side, as abortion is THE moral outrage of our times. But we don't. We can fight for both at the same time.

I do think, however, that if immigration is not controlled soon, the abortion fight will be lost. The reasons I think this are too complicated to go into here, but suffice it to say, more Democratic voters cannot be a good thing for the pro-life movement.

[gridlock]

Even though it will probably help the Dems to abandon "abortion rights," and possibly capture some of the support the moral high-road has given the Republican party, it is a wonderful thing!

Of course, it could happen that the Pro-Choicers get disgusted with the Democrats and decide to go third party. I am sure Abortion will remain a plank in the Green Party Platform for the forseeable future, since it fits in with all their greenie-weenie population control nonsense.

If a serious third party movement captures even a portion of the Pro-Choice crowd, the Donks are toast, forever. Political parties come and political parties go. You don't see any Whigs around, anymore, after all. This may be the end of the Democrat Party.

[colorado tanker]

There is always a chance that this will be a grand slam HR for the GOP with the Dim potty splintering into two or more parties, one the traditional Dims (whatever the Hell that means) and then, of course, the anti-war but kill the babies party.

It's possible. They split over national defense in the 1970's. And since Roe a lot of Catholics and evangelicals who traditionally voted Roosevelt Democrat drifted over to the pubbies. I just don't know if there are enough pro-life Democrats left to challenge the establishment or establish a new party.

A pro-life Democrat is running for Governor here and the Dims have made him pinky-swear he won't make any pro-life changes to state law or regulation, and they still may deny him the nomination.

[Rubber_Duckie_27]

There are a lot of women who make the hypocritical claim that while THEY would never have an abortion, they feel it needs to be a right for everyone else. So while they're to good to kill their kid, it's OK for other people to do it.

"Everyone else" of course, would be young, single welfare mothers, minorities, and others who the libs feel shouldn't reproduce. After all, the libs figure those folks aren't enlightened.

It's almost eugenic in nature - totally disgusting.

[Trillian]

ping

[Caleb1411]

I don't really get how the title makes sense.

Part of the answer is the title's similarity to a well-known pro-life truism:

The rest is Coulter's cleverness, tying her subject to "bleeding-heart liberals," who value animal lives, insect lives, and condemned-criminal lives, but not helpless, voiceless and choiceless unborn lives.