Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) contends that only vigorous opposition has led Bush to refrain from selecting even more conservative judicial nominees.

Alito is an example, Schumer said. Legal observers think Alito is not as conservative as some candidates Bush was considering.

THE WORDS OF A CLUELESS MORON.

1 posted on 01/22/2006 2:15:53 PM PST by new yorker 77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
To: new yorker 77
I hope the vote ends up being 56-44 or something.

Why? Because it'll be within filibuster range, and then the left wing zealots over at DU and MoveOn.org will flip out, demanding their party move more to the left, and the Democrats will have no choice but to comply. This country won't vote for a leftist party, but the Democrats will move left anyway as a result.

2 posted on 01/22/2006 2:18:17 PM PST by SunnyD1182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

He's trying to salvage some cred with the base.


3 posted on 01/22/2006 2:18:42 PM PST by atomicpossum (Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
Schumer and his other Dim buddies are like third graders on the playground. It is funny to see them throw hissy fits when the are beating by the better team.
4 posted on 01/22/2006 2:19:04 PM PST by msnimje (What’s the deal with all the self-appointed, holier than thou, correcto maniacs on Free Republic??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
What Schumer is doing is called searching for diamonds in the mud.
5 posted on 01/22/2006 2:20:51 PM PST by carlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
Now if Ginsberg or Steven resigns .....
6 posted on 01/22/2006 2:21:03 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Around Friday Hil will be sayin', "Here come da JUDGE"


8 posted on 01/22/2006 2:22:37 PM PST by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Wait til they have to vote on Ginsburg's replacement...which i'd like to see it be harriet meirs again. They'd be in such a trick bag...


9 posted on 01/22/2006 2:22:48 PM PST by stylin19a (God does not apply to your alloted time, the hours spent playing golf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
"For one thing, Democrats want to withhold votes and reduce his winning margin so that Alito can be used as a campaign issue in future elections."

Go ahead and try. In fact, PLEASE try...

13 posted on 01/22/2006 2:27:33 PM PST by alancarp (Will hack code for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

It's like he puts a bunch of words together in his head & hopes when they come spewing out of his mouth, they might make some sense....


14 posted on 01/22/2006 2:28:29 PM PST by SAMS (Nobody loves a soldier until the enemy is at the gate; Army Wife & Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
Alito is an example, Schumer said. Legal observers think Alito is not as conservative as some candidates Bush was considering.

So, then, Schumer is voting for Alito?

18 posted on 01/22/2006 2:35:55 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

This is all about the Senate Democrats being completely under the thumb of Ralph Neas, NOW, NARAL, and likeminded left-wing pressure groups. Alito is one of the best-qualified nominees ever put forward by any President, and most of the 'Rats will vote "no."


21 posted on 01/22/2006 2:41:24 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

He's saving what face he has left after getting it driven into the pavement during the hearings.


26 posted on 01/22/2006 2:54:13 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

the words of a pethetic loser trying to save face. the JUNIOR senator is a jerk. A real, unadulterated JERK!


27 posted on 01/22/2006 2:59:56 PM PST by cubreporter (I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than anyone will ever know. He's A++)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Trying to appease the Lunatic Fringe of the Left (also known as the Democrat Party) is like trying to appease the lunatic Islamofascists, and for essentially the same reason.


28 posted on 01/22/2006 3:03:19 PM PST by Savage Beast (Women are like wine. You get what you pay for. Mine's the best. It's expensive. It's worth it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

The Dem'crats can end this "polarization" any time they want.

There is, and always has been, room for legitimate disagreement in the course of establishing the governing principles of this nation. What the Dem'crats have done, consciously or otherwise, is to seek areas of dispute that have nothing to do with the virtues of the philosophies involved, but resolve into invective and attacks on personal attributes. George Bush gets called a "Nazi", by people who have little or no idea of what life under REAL National Socialism was like.

Steer the dialogue back to the matters at hand, and come up with some WORKABLE alternatives, then maybe there will be a possibility of re-establishing some sort of compromise in the generation of legislation and the application of the power of the nation to solving the problems which confront us all.

And just maybe, establish a second political party in Washington which may be called "pro-American".


29 posted on 01/22/2006 3:04:07 PM PST by alloysteel (There is no substitute for success. None. Nobody remembers who was in second place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Don't get over confident--the Dems may be able to pull together enough votes for a filibuster and am not sure Frist has the spine to invoke the nuclear option..Be prepared and write his office now!


30 posted on 01/22/2006 3:04:16 PM PST by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) contends that only vigorous opposition has led Bush to refrain from selecting even more conservative judicial nominees.

So we have that going for us.....which is nice!

Pray for W and Our SC Justice Alito

32 posted on 01/22/2006 3:08:00 PM PST by bray (President Bush Protects America. The Rats Protect Terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

"President Bush has proceeded to put a Republican imprint on all levels of the federal bench" God I hope so!


33 posted on 01/22/2006 3:15:08 PM PST by Steveone (Liberalism is a brain tumor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77
Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) contends that only vigorous opposition has led Bush to refrain from selecting even more conservative judicial nominees.

Hey, if this is what vigorous opposition gets us... BRING IT ON.

34 posted on 01/22/2006 3:20:07 PM PST by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: new yorker 77

Wait 'till Bush replaces Ginsberg or Stevens with Janice Rogers Brown. Their heads will explode.


37 posted on 01/22/2006 3:26:20 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson