Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's Dogged as Does It [Darwin in the Galápagos]
Scientific American ^ | February 2006 issue | Michael Shermer

Posted on 01/22/2006 4:28:17 AM PST by PatrickHenry

Among the many traits that made Charles Darwin one of the greatest minds in science was his pertinacious personality. Facing a daunting problem in natural history, Darwin would obstinately chip away at it until its secrets relented. His apt description for this disposition came from an 1867 Anthony Trollope novel in which one of the characters opined: "There ain't nowt a man can't bear if he'll only be dogged.... It's dogged as does it." Darwin's son Francis recalled his father's temperament: "Doggedness expresses his frame of mind almost better than perseverance. Perseverance seems hardly to express his almost fierce desire to force the truth to reveal itself."

Historian of science Frank J. Sulloway of the University of California, Berkeley, has highlighted Darwin's dogged genius in his own tenacious efforts to force the truth of how Darwin actually pieced together the theory of evolution. The iconic myth is that Darwin became an evolutionist in the Galápagos when he discovered natural selection operating on finch beaks and tortoise carapaces, each species uniquely adapted by food type or island ecology. The notion is ubiquitous, appearing in everything from biology textbooks to travel brochures, the latter inveigling potential travelers to visit the mecca of evolutionary theory and walk in the tracks of St. Darwin the Divine.

In June 2004 Sulloway and I did just that, spending a month retracing some of Darwin's fabled footsteps. Sulloway is one sagacious scientist, but I had no idea he was such an intrepid field explorer until we hit the lava on San Cristóbal to reconstruct the famous naturalist's explorations there. Doggedness is the watchword here: with a sweltering equatorial sun and almost no freshwater, it is not long before 70-pound water-loaded packs begin to buckle knees and strain backs. Add hours of daily bushwhacking through dry, dense, scratchy vegetation, and the romance of fieldwork quickly fades.

Yet the harder it got, the more resolute Sulloway became. He actually seemed to enjoy the misery, and this gave me a glimpse into Darwin's single-mindedness. At the end of one particularly grueling climb through a moonscapelike area Darwin called the "craterized district" of San Cristóbal, we collapsed in utter exhaustion, muscles quivering, and sweat pouring off our hands and faces. Darwin described a similar excursion as "a long walk."

Death permeates these islands. Animal carcasses are scattered hither and yon. The vegetation is coarse and scrappy. Dried and shriveled cacti trunks dot a bleak lava landscape so broken with razor-sharp edges that moving across it is glacially slow. Many people have died, from stranded sailors of centuries past to wanderlust-struck tourists of recent years. Within days I had a deep sense of isolation and of life's fragility. Without the protective blanket of civilization, none of us is far from death. With precious little water and even less edible foliage, organisms eke out a precarious living, their adaptations to this harsh environment selected for over millions of years. These critters are hanging on by the skin of their adaptive radiations. A lifelong observer of, and participant in, the creation-evolution controversy, I was struck by how clear the solution is in these islands: creation by intelligent design is absurd. Why, then, did Darwin depart the Galápagos a creationist?

The Darwin Galápagos legend is emblematic of a broader myth that science proceeds by select "eureka!" discoveries followed by sudden revolutionary revelations, whereupon old theories fall before new facts. Not quite. Paradigms power perceptions. Sulloway discovered that nine months after departing the Galápagos, Darwin made this entry in his ornithological catalogue about his mockingbird collection: "When I see these Islands in sight of each other, & possessed of but a scanty stock of animals, tenanted by these birds, but slightly differing in structure & filling the same place in Nature, I must suspect they are only varieties." That is, similar varieties of fixed kinds, rather than the myth that he already knew that evolution was responsible for the creation of separate species. Darwin was still a creationist! This quotation explains why Darwin did not even bother to record the island locations of the few finches he collected (and in some cases mislabeled) and why, as Sulloway has pointed out, these now famous "Darwin finches" were never specifically mentioned in On the Origin of Species.

Darwin similarly botched his tortoise observations. Later, he recalled a conversation he had had while in the islands with the vice governor Nicholas O. Lawson, who explained that for the tortoises Lawson "could with certainty tell from which island any one was brought. I did not for some time pay sufficient attention to this statement, and I had already partially mingled together the collections from two of the islands." Worse, as Sulloway recounts humorously, Darwin and his mates ate the remaining tortoises on the voyage home. As Darwin later confessed: "I never dreamed that islands, about fifty or sixty miles apart, and most of them in sight of each other, formed of precisely the same rocks, placed under a quite similar climate, rising to a nearly equal height, would have been differently tenanted."

Through careful analysis of Darwin's notes and journals, Sulloway dates Darwin's acceptance of the fact of evolution to the second week of March 1837, after a meeting Darwin had with the eminent English ornithologist John Gould, who had been studying his Galápagos bird specimens. With access to museum ornithological collections from areas of South America that Darwin had not visited, Gould corrected a number of taxonomic errors Darwin had made (such as labeling two finch species a "Wren" and an "Icterus") and pointed out to him that although the land birds in the Galápagos were endemic to the islands, they were notably South American in character.

Darwin left the meeting with Gould, Sulloway concludes, convinced "beyond a doubt that transmutation must be responsible for the presence of similar but distinct species on the different islands of the Galápagos group. The supposedly immutable 'species barrier' had finally been broken, at least in Darwin's own mind." That July, Darwin opened his first notebook on Transmutation of Species, in which he noted: "Had been greatly struck from about Month of previous March on character of S. American fossils -- and species on Galapagos Archipelago. These facts origin (especially latter) of all my views." By 1845 Darwin was confident enough in his data to theorize on the deeper implications of the Galápagos: "The archipelago is a little world within itself, or rather a satellite attached to America, whence it has derived a few stray colonists, and has received the general character of its indigenous productions.… Hence both in space and time, we seem to be brought somewhat near to that great fact--that mystery of mysteries--the first appearance of new beings on this earth."

For a century and a half, Darwin's theory has steadfastly explained more disparate facts of nature than any other in the history of biology; the process itself is equally dogged, as Darwin explained: "It may be said that natural selection is daily and hourly scrutinising, throughout the world, every variation, even the slightest; rejecting that which is bad, preserving and adding up all that is good; silently and insensibly working, whenever and wherever opportunity offers." Doggedly so.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: crevolist; evolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last
The author of this article also gave us this one: 15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense.
1 posted on 01/22/2006 4:28:19 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
Evolution Ping

The List-O-Links
A conservative, pro-evolution science list, now with over 340 names.
See the list's explanation, then FReepmail to be added or dropped.
To assist beginners: But it's "just a theory", Evo-Troll's Toolkit,
and How to argue against a scientific theory.

2 posted on 01/22/2006 4:29:41 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Conspiracy That Cares

Corrupting the World's Youth Since 1859


January 22, 2006

The CrevoSci Archive

Since June 25, 1999


Keyword Searches


Links


Box Scores

2006 Threads to date: 115
2006 Daily Average:  5.23
Cataloged Threads 3117
Daily Average: 1.3
Participants: 997
Percent Banned: 11%

Freepdays

  1. [2000-01-18] 2banana
  2. [2001-01-24] agenda_express
  3. [2002-01-26] ALS
  4. [1999-01-23] Antiwar Republican
  5. [1998-01-19] BB2
  6. [1999-01-26] Bernard Marx
  7. [1998-01-21] Cameron
  8. [1999-01-24] Cautor
  9. [2000-01-03] Condorman
  10. [2003-01-17] conservativecorner
  11. [2006-01-03] Creationist
  12. [2003-01-16] cyborg
  13. [2002-01-12] Dajjal
  14. [2000-01-26] DallasMike
  15. [2000-01-08] Deadeye Division
  16. [2003-01-31] Diddley
  17. [2003-01-23] El Laton Caliente
  18. [2000-01-11] exnavy
  19. [2005-01-30] From many - one.
  20. [2005-01-03] Fruit of the Spirit
  21. [2003-01-23] ganeshpuri89
  22. [1999-01-29] Gritty
  23. [1999-01-31] Hacksaw
  24. [1998-01-16] holly
  25. [2005-01-17] isaiah55version11_0
  26. [2005-01-21] JCRoberts
  27. [2002-01-02] Jeff Gordon
  28. [2001-01-31] JMFoard
  29. [2001-01-24] Just another Joe
  30. [2000-01-07] Keyes2000mt
  31. [2002-01-14] Lost Highway
  32. [2005-01-27] manny613
  33. [1999-01-04] Map Kernow
  34. [1999-01-31] Mark Felton
  35. [1999-01-25] Matchett-PI
  36. [2004-01-16] mc6809e
  37. [2002-01-17] MEGoody
  38. [2005-01-20] MHalblaub
  39. [2002-01-22] mikegi
  40. [2003-01-21] Mikey_1962
  41. [1999-01-31] Mr.Clark
  42. [2004-01-08] orionblamblam
  43. [2002-01-02] Oxylus
  44. [2003-01-25] Prolixus
  45. [2005-01-05] Right Wing It
  46. [2000-01-31] RoughDobermann
  47. [1999-01-22] Rudder
  48. [2000-01-21] SJackson
  49. [2003-01-06] skinkinthegrass
  50. [1999-01-31] Slings and Arrows
  51. [2001-01-13] Still Thinking
  52. [2004-01-03] SunkenCiv
  53. [2002-01-12] Tomalak
  54. [2002-01-30] truenospinzone
  55. [2003-01-12] Voice in your head
  56. [2004-01-29] wagglebee
  57. [2002-01-30] wallcrawlr
  58. [2001-01-10] Weatherman123
  59. [1998-01-22] wotan
  60. [2004-01-15] writer33
  61. [1998-01-21] zerosix

CrevoSci Threads for the Past Week

  1. 2006-01-22 It's Dogged as Does It [Darwin in the Galápagos]
  2. 2006-01-21 Ancient lakes of the Sahara
  3. 2006-01-21 God's Guide to Sex
  4. 2006-01-21 Hardwired To Seek Beauty
  5. 2006-01-21 In 'Design' vs. Darwinism, Darwin Wins Point in Rome
  6. 2006-01-21 Ken Ham Continues Assault on Bible & Christians
  7. 2006-01-21 Mutation found that cures heart disease
  8. 2006-01-20 Fish Gill Evolves toward Tetrapod Ear? (Just-So-So)
  9. 2006-01-20 Geometry may be hard-wired into brain, study shows
  10. 2006-01-20 'Intelligent design' not science: Vatican paper
  11. 2006-01-19 'Intelligent design' not science: Vatican paper
  12. 2006-01-19 Lab fireball 'may be black hole'
  13. 2006-01-19 New Study Reveals Neanderthals Were As Good At Hunting As Early Modern Humans
  14. 2006-01-19 Why we [should] care about Darwin wars
  15. 2006-01-19 WorldWatch - Creation and Evolution in the Schools
  16. 2006-01-18 Our ears once breathed [evolution of ears]
  17. 2006-01-18 Vatican Paper Hits 'Intelligent Design'
  18. 2006-01-17 Calif. School Scraps 'Intelligent Design' [El Tejon litigation]
  19. 2006-01-17 Cosmic Fingerprints: Evidence of Design Conference, South Carolina
  20. 2006-01-17 Earth Doomed (according to renowned British scientist)
  21. 2006-01-17 'Footprints' Debate To Run And Run (40K YO Human Footprints, Mexico)
  22. 2006-01-17 'intelligent design class' -- halted at Frazier High School, CA
  23. 2006-01-17 Plants revealed as methane source
  24. 2006-01-17 Scientists discover most fertile Irish male
  25. 2006-01-17 The Right Time to Fool Around?( Darwinism Rationalizes Adultery)
  26. 2006-01-16 Great Debate on Science and the Bible: Part 1
  27. 2006-01-16 I'm a great believer in doubt. At least I think I am. (Creationism vs. Evolution)
  28. 2006-01-16 Scientists journey towards centre of the Earth to seek out origins of life
  29. 2006-01-16 Stone Age Footwork: Ancient Human Prints Turn Up Down Under
  30. 2006-01-16 The 'Indigo Children' have arrived
  31. 2006-01-16 Why Are Darwinists So Afraid of Intelligent Design?

On this Date in CrevoSci History

  1. 2005-01-22 Evolution a theory? That's right
  2. 2005-01-22 When Do I Get a Break?
  3. 2003-01-22 Hunters Claim to Find 4-Winged Dinosaur
  4. 2003-01-22 The Conservatives' War on Ideas
  5. 2003-01-22 The old lignite skull
  6. 2001-01-22 Evolution vs Creation - 'The Living Word Of God' (Thread 7)
  7. 2000-01-22 20 Questions for Evolutionists

Deleted, Locked, or Pulled Threads

  1. 2005-11-15 'Perception' gene tracked humanity's evolution, scientists say [Locked]
  2. 2004-04-27 Stop Teaching Our Kids this Evolution Claptrap! [Pulled]
  3. 2003-10-29 The Mystery of the Missing Links (Intelligent Design vs. Evolution) [Pulled]
  4. 2003-10-27 Physics Nobelist Takes Stand on Evolution [Pulled]
  5. 2003-10-23 Gene Found for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder [Pulled]
  6. 2003-10-21 Artificial Proteins Assembled from Scratch [Pulled]
  7. 2003-09-23 Solar System Formation Questions [Pulled]
  8. 2003-09-17 Agreement of the Willing - Free Republic Science Threads [Pulled]
  9. 2003-07-18 Unlikely Group May Revive Darwin Debate [Evolution v. Creationism] [Pulled]
  10. 2003-07-02 Unlocking the Mystery of 'Unlocking the Mystery of Life' [Pulled]
  11. 2003-06-26 Darwin Faces a New Rival [Pulled]
  12. 2003-06-06 Amazing Creatures [Pulled]
  13. 2002-09-14 Geological Theory Explains Origin of Ocean, Continents [Pulled]
  14. 2002-09-13 Oldest Known Penis Is 100 Million Years Old [Pulled]
  15. 2002-04-13 To Creationists: Is There a Global Conspiracy to Promote Evolution? [Pulled]
  16. 2002-04-10 (Creationists) CRSC Correction [Pulled]
  17. 2002-04-04 Evolution: What is it? (long article) [Locked]
  18. 2002-03-22 Evolution is designed for science classes [Pulled]
  19. 2002-03-05 Life found 'on margin of existence' [Pulled]
  20. 2001-11-10 Alabama to continue biology textbook warning sticker [Pulled]
  21. 2001-11-06 Warming makes mosquito evolve, University of Oregon scientists find [Pulled]
  22. 2001-09-18 CHEERED BY BIGOTS, SCIENTIFIC INDIA TAKES 'GIANT LEAP BACKWARDS' [Pulled]
  23. 2001-08-29 How Not to Defend Evolution [Deleted]
  24. 2001-08-28 The Ultimate Creation vs. Evolution Resource [6th Revision] [Deleted]
  25. 2001-08-27 Top Ten Problems with the Big Bang [Deleted]
  26. 2001-08-26 A Scientific Account of the Origin of Life on Earth [Thread I] [Deleted]
  27. 2001-08-24 Satellites Search for Noah’s Ark [Deleted]
  28. 2001-07-19 The Effect of Darwinism on Morality and Christianity [Deleted]
  29. 2001-07-19 The Scientific Case Against Evolution: A Summary Part I [Deleted]
  30. 2001-07-19 The Scientific Case Against Evolution: A Summary Part II [Deleted]
  31. 2001-07-19 Evolution is Religion — Not Science [Deleted]
  32. 2001-07-07 Evolution Fraud in Current Biology Textbooks [Deleted]
  33. 2001-03-31 Enlisting Science to Find the Fingerprints of a Creator [No Such File]
  34. 2001-01-13 A Christian Understanding of Intelligent Design [Deleted]
  35. 2000-11-15 Evolutionism Receives Another Hard Blow [Deleted]
  36. 2000-10-10 Another Lost Generation? [Deleted]
  37. 2000-10-02 God and the Academy [Deleted]
  38. 2000-09-18 The World of Design [Deleted]
  39. 2000-08-30 Evil-Ution [Deleted]
  40. 1999-11-14 Creationism's Success Past 5 Years: (Gallup: 1 in 10 hold secular evolutionist perspective) [No Such File]

The Wall

  1. 1LongTimeLurker
  2. 2Trievers
  3. Ada Coddington
  4. Ahab Brigade
  5. Ahriman
  6. akdonn
  7. ALS
  8. angelo
  9. Area Freeper
  10. Aric2000
  11. Askel5
  12. Asphalt
  13. biblewonk
  14. bluepistolero
  15. Boot Hill
  16. broberts
  17. churchillbuff
  18. claptrap
  19. Clinton's a liar
  20. codebreaker
  21. Con X-Poser
  22. D. Skippy
  23. dbbeebs
  24. Destro
  25. DittoJed2
  26. dob
  27. Ed Current
  28. Exnihilo
  29. f.Christian
  30. Far Gone
  31. farmfriend
  32. followerofchrist
  33. freeparella
  34. general_re
  35. geros
  36. Good Tidings Of Great Joy
  37. goodseedhomeschool
  38. gopwinsin04
  39. gore3000
  40. H.R. Gross
  41. Happy2BMe
  42. Helms
  43. Ignatius J Reilly
  44. IllumiNOTi
  45. JediGirl
  46. JesseShurun
  47. JethroHathaway
  48. JFK_Lib
  49. jlogajan
  50. JoeSchem
  51. john_baldacci_is_a_commie
  52. Justice Avenger
  53. Kevin Curry
  54. kharaku
  55. knowquest
  56. Land of the Irish
  57. LarryLied
  58. Le-Roy
  59. malakhi
  60. Marathon
  61. masked face doom
  62. medved
  63. Merdoug
  64. metacognative
  65. mikeharris65
  66. missyme
  67. Modernman
  68. Morris Hattrick
  69. mrustow
  70. n4sir
  71. neoconsareright
  72. newsperson999
  73. NoKinToMonkeys
  74. nuda_veritas
  75. Ogmios
  76. OnlyinAmerica
  77. peg the prophet
  78. Pern
  79. Phaedrus
  80. Phoroneus
  81. pickemuphere
  82. RCW2001
  83. ReasonedThought
  84. ret_medic
  85. RickyJ
  86. RJCogburn
  87. Sabertooth
  88. ScotchBible
  89. SeaLion
  90. Selkie
  91. Shubi
  92. spiker
  93. SplashDog
  94. Stingy Dog
  95. StupidQuestions
  96. That Subliminal Kid
  97. The Loan Arranger
  98. the lone rider
  99. Tomax
  100. tpaine
  101. Truth666
  102. Turan
  103. twittle
  104. Unalienable
  105. USA2000
  106. WaveThatFlag
  107. What about Bob?
  108. winner45
  109. xm177e2


3 posted on 01/22/2006 5:02:51 AM PST by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

I wonder what kind of beaks the finches would evolve if they ate bacon and eggs with gravy biscuits for breakfast.


4 posted on 01/22/2006 5:08:46 AM PST by shuckmaster (An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

But he repented on his death bed.


5 posted on 01/22/2006 5:30:49 AM PST by RoadTest (- - Israel shall blossom and bud, and fill the face of the world with fruit. - Isaiah 27:6b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest

What if he didn't?


6 posted on 01/22/2006 5:41:32 AM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest
"But he repented on his death bed."

No, he really didn't. That's a creationist Myth started by a woman who called herself Lady Hope. Her claims about Darwin's *repentance* are at odds with Darwin's own children's accounts (his daughter was a devout Christian who would have been THRILLED if Darwin had converted). It makes absolutely no sense why he would tell this stranger his he converted and not tell his wife who worried every day about his soul. There is absolutely no evidence he ever changed his mind. The evidence is that he died content in the knowledge his theory was well supported.
7 posted on 01/22/2006 5:46:07 AM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman

You sound glad he never repented. Why?


8 posted on 01/22/2006 6:02:25 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

And this was written to refuse Rennie's nonsense.

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2575


9 posted on 01/22/2006 6:03:15 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
The Lady Hope Story: A Widespread Falsehood. Sorry, Darwin made no deathbed recantation. (But Galileo actually did recant, so the earth doesn't move and the solar system doesn't exist.)
10 posted on 01/22/2006 6:06:44 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"You sound glad he never repented. Why?"

He had nothing to repent for.


11 posted on 01/22/2006 6:07:42 AM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2575

in 1988, physicist George Greenstein wrote:

As we survey all the evidence, the thought insistently arises that some supernatural agency—or, rather, Agency—must be involved. Is it possible that suddenly, without intending to, we have stumbled upon scientific proof of the existence of a Supreme Being? Was it God who stepped in and so providentially crafted the cosmos for our benefit? (1988, p. 27).

In 1992, Arno Penzias (who fourteen years earlier had shared the 1978 Nobel Prize in physics with Robert W. Wilson for their discovery of the so-called “background radiation” left over from the Big Bang) declared:

Astronomy leads us to a unique event, a universe which was created out of nothing, one with the very delicate balance needed to provide exactly the conditions required to permit life, and one which has an underlying (one might say “supernatural”) plan [p. 83, parenthetical comment in orig.].

In his 1994 book, The Physics of Immortality, Frank Tipler (who co-authored with John D. Barrow the massive 1986 volume, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle) wrote:

When I began my career as a cosmologist some twenty years ago, I was a convinced atheist. I never in my wildest dreams imagined that one day I would be writing a book purporting to show that the central claims of Judeo-Christian theology are in fact true, that these claims are straightforward deductions of the laws of physics as we now understand them. I have been forced into these conclusions by the inexorable logic of my own special branch of physics (Preface).


12 posted on 01/22/2006 6:09:57 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

If you consider the creationist beliefs of a small number of individual physicists to be evidence for creationism, then you must consider the much larger number of physicists who do not share the creationist believe to be strong evidence against creationism... correct?


13 posted on 01/22/2006 6:15:16 AM PST by crail (Better lives have been lost on the gallows than have ever been enshrined in the halls of palaces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster
"I wonder what kind of beaks the finches would evolve if they ate bacon and eggs with gravy biscuits for breakfast."

I would imagine something resembling a fork and knife.

14 posted on 01/22/2006 6:20:10 AM PST by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: crail

I just prefer to consider all possibilities.


15 posted on 01/22/2006 6:24:01 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Regarding the article by the same author that I linked back in post #1, we had a gigantic thread (over 2000 posts) on it a few years ago:
15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense [THE FINAL DEBUNKING]. Classic crevo, with medved, g3k, and lots of other now-banned creationists.
16 posted on 01/22/2006 6:24:12 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
...the romance of fieldwork quickly fades.

Which explains why so few become scientists.

17 posted on 01/22/2006 6:34:56 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Darwin spent some time at Islas Malvinas too.
18 posted on 01/22/2006 6:42:48 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster
I wonder what kind of beaks the finches would evolve if they ate bacon and eggs with gravy biscuits for breakfast.

If they developed a taste for finch eggs, then...

19 posted on 01/22/2006 7:05:57 AM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest
But he repented on his death bed.

I'm glad we got this lie out of the way early.

Now when the next person posts it, we'll know that it's not from ignorance.

20 posted on 01/22/2006 7:18:03 AM PST by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson