Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The author of this article also gave us this one: 15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense.
1 posted on 01/22/2006 4:28:19 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
Evolution Ping

The List-O-Links
A conservative, pro-evolution science list, now with over 340 names.
See the list's explanation, then FReepmail to be added or dropped.
To assist beginners: But it's "just a theory", Evo-Troll's Toolkit,
and How to argue against a scientific theory.

2 posted on 01/22/2006 4:29:41 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

But he repented on his death bed.


5 posted on 01/22/2006 5:30:49 AM PST by RoadTest (- - Israel shall blossom and bud, and fill the face of the world with fruit. - Isaiah 27:6b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

And this was written to refuse Rennie's nonsense.

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2575


9 posted on 01/22/2006 6:03:15 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2575

in 1988, physicist George Greenstein wrote:

As we survey all the evidence, the thought insistently arises that some supernatural agency—or, rather, Agency—must be involved. Is it possible that suddenly, without intending to, we have stumbled upon scientific proof of the existence of a Supreme Being? Was it God who stepped in and so providentially crafted the cosmos for our benefit? (1988, p. 27).

In 1992, Arno Penzias (who fourteen years earlier had shared the 1978 Nobel Prize in physics with Robert W. Wilson for their discovery of the so-called “background radiation” left over from the Big Bang) declared:

Astronomy leads us to a unique event, a universe which was created out of nothing, one with the very delicate balance needed to provide exactly the conditions required to permit life, and one which has an underlying (one might say “supernatural”) plan [p. 83, parenthetical comment in orig.].

In his 1994 book, The Physics of Immortality, Frank Tipler (who co-authored with John D. Barrow the massive 1986 volume, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle) wrote:

When I began my career as a cosmologist some twenty years ago, I was a convinced atheist. I never in my wildest dreams imagined that one day I would be writing a book purporting to show that the central claims of Judeo-Christian theology are in fact true, that these claims are straightforward deductions of the laws of physics as we now understand them. I have been forced into these conclusions by the inexorable logic of my own special branch of physics (Preface).


12 posted on 01/22/2006 6:09:57 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Regarding the article by the same author that I linked back in post #1, we had a gigantic thread (over 2000 posts) on it a few years ago:
15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense [THE FINAL DEBUNKING]. Classic crevo, with medved, g3k, and lots of other now-banned creationists.
16 posted on 01/22/2006 6:24:12 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
...the romance of fieldwork quickly fades.

Which explains why so few become scientists.

17 posted on 01/22/2006 6:34:56 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Darwin spent some time at Islas Malvinas too.
18 posted on 01/22/2006 6:42:48 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Thx, PH :))
I always enjoy these threads.
21 posted on 01/22/2006 7:38:30 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

It's absurd to say that Darwin "departed the Galapagos a creationist."

If you read his account in The Voyage of the Beagle, you can clearly see the way he's angling. What I see is his famous reluctance to come right out with it.

He compares the fossil and living fauna of Argentina and says, "This wonderful relationship in the same continent between the dead and the living, will, I do not doubt, hereafter throw more light on the appearance of organic beings on our earth, and their disappearance from it, than any other class of facts."

Translation, "The modern fauna obviously evolved from the extinct fauna." And this was before he even GOT to the Galapagos.


24 posted on 01/22/2006 9:50:47 AM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

I wonder if John Gould is any kin to the late Stephen J. Gould.


49 posted on 01/22/2006 2:55:04 PM PST by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Bookmark


99 posted on 01/22/2006 8:00:56 PM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson