Annual List Of...The World's 10 Worst Dictators

parade.com ^ | 21 January 2006 | David Wallechinsky

[vikingd00d]

A "dictator" is a head of state who exercises arbitrary authority over the lives of his citizens and who cannot be removed from power through legal means. The worst commit terrible human-rights abuses. This present list draws in part on reports by global human-rights organizations, including Human Rights Watch, Freedom House, Reporters Without Borders and Amnesty International. While the three worst from 2005 have retained their places, two on last year's list (Muammar al-Qaddafi of Libya and Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan) have slipped out of the Top 10-not because their conduct has improved but because other dictators have gotten worse.

1) Omar al-Bashir, Sudan. Age 62. In power since 1989. Last year's rank: 1

Since February 2003, Bashir's campaign of ethnic and religious persecution has killed at least 180,000 civilians in Darfur in western Sudan and driven 2 million people from their homes. The good news is that Bashir's army and the Janjaweed militia that he supports have all but stopped burning down villages in Darfur. The bad news is why they've stopped: There are few villages left to burn. The attacks now are aimed at refugee camps. While the media have called these actions "a humanitarian tragedy," Bashir himself has escaped major condemnation. In 2005, Bashir signed a peace agreement with the largest rebel group in non-Islamic southern Sudan and allowed its leader, John Garang, to become the nation's vice president. But Garang died in July in a helicopter crash, and Bashir's troops still occupy the south.

2) Kim Jong-il, North Korea. Age 63. In power since 1994. Last year's rank: 2

While the outside world focuses on Kim Jong-il's nuclear weapons program, domestically he runs the world's most tightly controlled society. North Korea continues to rank last in the index of press freedom compiled by Reporters Without Borders, and for the 34th straight year it earned the worst possible score on political rights and civil liberties from Freedom House. An estimated 250,000 people are confined in "reeducation camps." Malnourishment is widespread: According to the United Nations World Food Program, the average 7-year-old boy in North Korea is almost 8 inches shorter than a South Korean boy the same age and more than 20 pounds lighter.

3) Than Shwe, Burma (Myanmar). Age 72. In power since 1992. Last year's rank: 3

In November 2005, without warning, Than Shwe moved his entire government from Rangoon (Yangon), the capital for the last 120 years, to Pyinmana, a remote area 245 miles away. Civil servants were given two days' notice and are forbidden from resigning. Burma leads the world in the use of children as soldiers, and the regime is notorious for using forced labor on construction projects and as porters for the army in war zones. The long-standing house arrest of Aung San Suu Kyi, winner of the 1991 Nobel Peace Prize and Than Shwe's most feared opponent, recently was extended for six months. Just to drive near her heavily guarded home is to risk arrest.

4) Robert Mugabe, Zimbabwe. Age 81. In power since 1980. Last year's rank: 9

Life in Zimbabwe has gone from bad to worse: It has the world's highest inflation rate, 80% unemployment and an HIV/AIDS rate of more than 20%. Life expectancy has declined since 1988 from 62 to 38 years. Farming has collapsed since 2000, when Mugabe began seizing white-owned farms, giving most of them to political allies with no background in agriculture. In 2005, Mugabe launched Operation Murambatsvina (Clean the Filth), the forcible eviction of some 700,000 people from their homes or businesses-"to restore order and sanity," says the government. But locals say the reason was to forestall demonstrations as the economy deteriorates.

5) Islam Karimov, Uzbekistan. Age 67. In power since 1990. Last year's rank: 15

Until 2005, the worst excesses of Karimov's regime had taken place in the torture rooms of his prisons. But on May 13, he ordered a mass killing that could not be concealed. In the city of Andijan, 23 businessmen, held in prison and awaiting a verdict, were freed by their supporters, who then held an open meeting in the town square. An estimated 10,000 people gathered, expecting government officials to come and listen to their grievances. Instead, Karimov sent the army, which massacred hundreds of men, women and children. A 2003 law made Karimov and all members of his family immune from prosecution forever.

6) Hu Jintao, China. Age 63. In power since 2002. Last year's rank: 4

Although some Chinese have taken advantage of economic liberalization to become rich, up to 150 million Chinese live on $1 a day or less in this nation with no minimum wage. Between 250,000 and 300,000 political dissidents are held in "reeducation-through-labor" camps without trial. Less than 5% of criminal trials include witnesses, and the conviction rate is 99.7%. There are no privately owned TV or radio stations. The government opens and censors mail and monitors phone calls, faxes, e-mails and text messages. In preparation for the 2008 Olympics, at least 400,000 residents of Beijing have been forcibly evicted from their homes.

7) King Abdullah, Saudi Arabia. Age 82. In power since 1995. Last year's rank: 5

Although Abdullah did not become king until 2005, he has ruled Saudi Arabia since his half-brother, Fahd, suffered a stroke 10 years earlier. In Saudi Arabia, phone calls are recorded and mobile phones with cameras are banned. It is illegal for public employees "to engage in dialogue with local and foreign media." By law, all Saudi citizens must be Muslims. According to Amnesty International, police in Saudi Arabia routinely use torture to extract "confessions." Saudi women may not appear in public with a man who isn't a relative, must cover their bodies and faces in public and may not drive. The strict suppression of women is not voluntary, and Saudi women who would like to live a freer life are not allowed to do so.

8) Saparmurat Niyazov, Turkmenistan. Age 65. In power since 1990. Last year's rank: 8

Niyazov has created the world's most pervasive personality cult, and criticism of any of his policies is considered treason. The latest examples of his government-by-whim include bans on car radios, lip-synching and playing recorded music on TV or at weddings. Niyazov also has closed all national parks and shut down rural libraries. He launched an attack on his nation's health-care system, firing 15,000 health-care workers and replacing most of them with untrained military conscripts. He announced the closing of all hospitals outside the capital and ordered Turkmenistan's physicians to give up the Hippocratic Oath and to swear allegiance to him instead.

9) Seyed Ali Khamane'i, Iran. Age 66. In power since 1989. Last year's rank: 18

Over the past four years, the rulers of Iran have undone the reforms that were emerging in the nation. The hardliners completed this reversal by winning the parliamentary elections in 2004 -after disqualifying 44% of the candidates-and with the presidential election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in June 2005. Ultimately, however, the country is run by the 12-man Guardian Council, overseen by the Ayatollah Khamane'i, which has the right to veto any law that the elected government passes. Khamane'i has shut down the free press, tortured journalists and ordered the execution of homosexual males.

10) Teodoro Obiang Nguema, Equatorial Guinea. Age 63. In power since 1979. Last year's rank: 10

Obiang took power in this tiny West African nation by overthrowing his uncle more than 25 years ago. According to a United Nations inspector, torture "is the normal means of investigation" in Equatorial Guinea. There is no freedom of speech, and there are no bookstores or newsstands. The one private radio station is owned by Obiang's son. Since major oil reserves were discovered in Equatorial Guinea in 1995, Obiang has deposited more than $700 million into special accounts in U.S. banks. Meanwhile, most of his people live on less than $1 a day.

Contributing Editor David Wallechinsky has reported on world figures for PARADE, including an interview with Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi. For more on the worst dictators, visit parade.com on the Web.

[Lucky Dog]

30%, what's your point? There's more Chicoms and their allies than there are al-Qaeda sympathizers.

I see only one "Chicom." Those you class as "alies" are subject to debate.

My point is simple: The geographic areas of the world under the influence of "religion of peace" along with Communism appear to tolerate "dictators" of various stripes far more than anywhere else. Draw your own conclusions.

[Gay State Conservative]

he drove his car off a bridge, drowning a young lady who was his passenger. He was never prosecuted for the death.

You are wrong here,my friend.The senior Senator from Chappaquiddick *was* prosecuted *and* punished.

His driver's license was revoked for a few months (6,I think) but according to long time Boston newspaper columnist and Kennedy watcher,Howie Carr,he was caught driving at least once during the suspension period.

[IronJack]

Actually, Kennedy's license had expired on Feb. 22, almost five months before the accident. That fact was "fixed" by Registrar Richard McLaughlin of the Registry of Motor Vehicles before the "trial" started. If it had not been, it could have been introduced as evidence to support a charge of vehicular manslaughter.

[princess leah]

What happened to Syria and Iran's 2 nutjob presidents?

[Lejes Rimul]

Lol are you saying that North Korea, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, et al. AREN'T allies - note the second "l", btw - of China? Get your head out of the sand.

[IronJack]

What happened to Syria and Iran's 2 nutjob presidents?

Too much material, too few slots ...

[InvisibleChurch]

Do any of these guys ever show up for the awards ceremonies?

[101st-Eagle]

What, Bush isn't on it?

Seriously, it is good to see some attention getting paid to REAL tyrants who seriously oppress their people. People have gotten so irrational I bet a lot of leftists WOULD put Bush on it. They have no concept of what true evil is.

Beat me to the punch. IMO, the most egregious form of hypocrisy is seen in the Left's deafening silence over woman's rights in Islamic dictatorships. Isn't PC, ya know.

[EKrusling]

The list of parade.com goes from one to twenty. They put Castro at number 15.

[daviddennis]

I don't like Castro, but it's been a long time since he's done anything like the mass murders or starvation committed by the people on this list.

He's evil for suppressing the instincts of his people to do more and better, but he's not stained with the rivers of blood that follow Kim Jong Il and friends.

I'd certainly much rather be in Cuba than any of the countries on that list.

D

[righthand man]

bump

[LiteKeeper]

INTSUM

[AlphaOneAlpha]

Past Your Eyes,
You are the first one person to acknowledge that he/she had some kind of an inkling re what Alpha-One-Alpha was.

[Lucky Dog]

are you saying that North Korea, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, et al. AREN'T allies

Perhaps you could refer me to the treaty they signed. I don't seem to recall it, right off hand.

However, I do seem to recall that for those citizens not professing hardcore Communism, the dominant religion of Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, et al., in fact, nearly all of the stans, is Islam. Could this be the alliance to which you refer?

Unfortunately, that still leaves out North Korea, unless, again, you are tying that country to the others on the basis of Communism. Strangely, it seems that nearly all of those stans have abandoned Communism along with the demise of the USSR, at least, officially.

note the second "l",

Thanks for the spelling correction.

Get your head out of the sand.

Just as a passing note: you might find civility and good manners work better at influencing others than insults.

[Lejes Rimul]

Perhaps you could refer me to the treaty they signed. I don't seem to recall it, right off hand.

You don't need a treaty to be allies any more than you need a declaration to have a war. Didn't 9/11 teach you that?

However, I do seem to recall that for those citizens not professing hardcore Communism, the dominant religion of Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, et al., in fact, nearly all of the stans, is Islam. Could this be the alliance to which you refer?

And the dominant religion in Germany during WWII was Christianity. The dominant religion in Russia during the Cold War was Christianity, too. Again, what's your point? Islam has no more to do with the 'stans than Catholicism had to do with the 3rd Reich and Orthodoxy to do with the Soviet Union.

Thanks for the spelling correction.

You're welcome.

you might find civility and good manners work better at influencing others than insults.

Don't play with the big boys if you can't take the heat.

[Lucky Dog]

You don't need a treaty to be allies any more than you need a declaration to have a war. Didn't 9/11 teach you that?

Unfortunately, I disagree. A treaty is necessary for nations to be formally allied. Nations may follow similar paths in international relations for short periods, but that does not make them allies.

As to needing a declaration for war, perhaps you missed the Congressional action which authorized the President to take whatever actions he deemed appropriate in response to 9/11. Such an action was tantamount to a declaration of war.

Again, what's your point? Islam has no more to do with the 'stans than Catholicism had to do with the 3rd Reich and Orthodoxy to do with the Soviet Union.

It appears that you have chosen to ignore some pertinent facts. First, (Roman) Catholicism never endorsed the action of the Third Reich. In fact, where it was possible, official (Roman) Catholicism condemned these actions and worked against them at the time. Certainly, since the end of WWII, official (Roman) Catholicism has condemned these Third Reich actions.

Second, the Russian Orthodox Church was, for all intents and purposes, practically persecuted in the Soviet Union. I am unaware of any official approval given by that ecclesiastical body ever given to Communism or the USSR in a non-duress situation.

Third, neither (Roman) Catholic nor Russian Orthodox doctrines offer any “heavenly” reward to those who die in the process of killing innocents in the name of God. No Christian denomination demands that those who refuse to convert be killed or relegated to a second class status such as “dihimi” with taxes on “infidels” collected by a government.

In contrast to the (Roman) Catholic position on the Third Reich or the Russian Orthodox Church’s position vis-à-vis the USSR, there have been numerous, official, public statements from Islamic Mullahs and Imams approving of, not condemning, the attack of 9/11 and other co-religionist attacks against civilians and non-combatants. Further contrast exists with official “dihimi” taxes collected by some Islamic state governments… not even the Third Reich did that. However, like the Third Reich, some Islamic governments have sanctioned genocide and continue to do so (Darfur, for a current example). However, unlike the Third Reich, Islamic governments engaging in genocide have claimed approval in the tenants of their religion.

It would appear that facts have undermined your statement. In contrast to(Roman) Catholicism versus the Third Reich or the Russian Orthodox Church versus Communism, Islam seems to have a great deal to with the behavior of the “stans”.

Don't play with the big boys if you can't take the heat.

By implication, it is apparent that you count your self among the big boys. I was unaware that a requirement to be one of the big boys is the necessity to be rude. In fact it would seem that someone who uses such an excuse, perhaps has an opinion of self-importance that is unrealistically inflated.

[Lejes Rimul]

Unfortunately, I disagree.

And China and the 'stans really don't care how you feel about it. They're allies whether you want a piece of paper or not.

there have been numerous, official, public statements from Islamic Mullahs and Imams approving of, not condemning, the attack of 9/11

But none in the 'stans, which is where we're talking about. Don't change the subject. Like I said, they're closer to China than Saudi Arabia - or did you miss the recent massacre of Islamist sympathizers in Uzbekistan?

In fact it would seem that someone who uses such an excuse, perhaps has an opinion of self-importance that is unrealistically inflated.

Perhaps, but at least I'm right about China and the 'stans.

[Lucky Dog]

Perhaps, but at least I'm right about China and the 'stans....

And China and the 'stans really don't care how you feel about it.

It seems that your own words are the most fitting relative to your self-assessed, opinion.

[Lejes Rimul]

So I take it from your ad hominem that you admit your error re: the influence of China in the 'stans? After all, if you had facts to counter my argument with, you'd post them - but you didn't. The fact stands: despite the Muslim faith of their people, the 'stans are allies of China.

[WestVirginiaRebel]

Where's Hugo Chavez?