Posted on 01/20/2006 8:09:35 PM PST by strategofr
BERKELEY – University of California, Berkeley, physicists can now tune in to and hear normally inaudible quantum vibrations, called quantum whistles, enabling them to build very sensitive detectors of rotation or very precise gyroscopes. Quantum whistle Hear the synchronized vibrations from a chorus of more than 4,000 nano-whistles, created when physicists pushed superfluid helium-4 though an array of nanometer-sized holes. Note that the pitch drops as the pressure drops.
A quantum whistle is a peculiar characteristic of supercold condensed fluids, in this case superfluid helium-4, which vibrate when you try to push them through a tiny hole. Richard Packard, professor of physics at UC Berkeley, and graduate student Emile Hoskinson knew that many other researchers had failed to produce a quantum whistle by pushing helium-4 through a tiny aperture, which must be no bigger than a few tens of nanometers across - the size of the smallest viruses and about 1,000 times smaller than the diameter of a human hair.
To their surprise, however, a chorus of thousands of nano-whistles produced a wail loud enough to hear. This is the first demonstration of whistling in superfluid helium-4. According to Packard and Hoskinson, the purity of the tone may lead to the development of rotation sensors that are sufficiently sensitive to be used for Earth science, seismology and inertial navigation.
"You could measure rotational signals from an earthquake or build more precise gyroscopes for submarines," Packard speculated.
Four years ago, Packard and his coworkers built and successfully tested a gyroscope based on quantum whistling in superfluid helium-3. But that required cooling the device to a few thousandths of a degree above absolute zero, a highly specialized and time-consuming process. Because the new phenomenon exists at 2 Kelvin - a temperature achievable with off-the-shelf cryo-coolers - the proposed sensors also will be user-friendly to scientists unfamiliar with cryogenic technology. A temperature of 2 Kelvin is the equivalent of minus 456 degrees Fahrenheit.
"Because these oscillations appear in helium-4 at a temperature 2,000 times higher than in superfluid helium-3, it may be possible to build sensitive rotation sensors using much simpler technology than previously believed," the researchers wrote in a brief communication appearing in the Jan 27 issue of the journal Nature.
Packard noted that sensitive rotation or spin detectors could have application in numerous fields, from geodesy, which charts changes in the spin and wobble of the Earth, to navigation, where gyroscopes are used to guide ships. Though little is now know about the rotational signals from earthquakes, having a sensitive rotation detector might reveal new and interesting phenomena.
Quantum whistling is analogous to a phenomenon in another macroscopic quantum system, a superconductor, which develops an oscillating current when a voltage is applied across a non-conducting gap. Nobel Laureates Philip Anderson, Brian Josephson and Richard Feynman predicted in 1962 that the same would happen in superfluids. In the case of superfluids, however, a pressure difference across a tiny hole would cause a vibration in the superfluid at a frequency - the Josephson frequency - that increases as the pressure increases. The fact that the fluid oscillates back and forth through the hole rather than flows from the high-pressure side to the low-pressure side, as a normal liquid would, is one of the many weird aspects of quantum systems like superfluids.
Eight years ago, Packard and fellow UC Berkeley physicist Seamus Davis, now at Cornell University, heard such vibrations when pushing superfluid helium-3 through a similar array of 4,225 holes, each 100 nanometers across. Though no simple feat - it took them 10 years to make their experiment whistle, working at one thousandth of a degree Kelvin - it's theoretically easier than with helium-4.
For helium-4 to whistle, physicists predicted that the holes either had to be much smaller, pushing the limits of today's technology, or the temperature had to be within a few hundred thousandths of a degree of the temperature at which helium-4 becomes a superfluid, that is, 2 Kelvin. While working with an array of holes 70 nanometers across, essentially testing the apparatus with helium-4 before using it to conduct a helium-3 experiment, Hoskinson was surprised when he put on earphones and heard the characteristic slide whistle sound as the pitch dropped with the pressure in the device.
"Predictions on where the Josephson oscillations would occur put them much closer to the transition temperature than I could hope to go," Hoskinson said. "The fact that I could detect the oscillations with the set-up I had was amazing in itself, and something we're very interested in exploring."
He and Packard calculated that the tones were due to a different mechanism, phase slippage, than that producing the whistle in helium-3, though it follows the same relationship between frequency and driving pressure. Phase slippage shouldn't have produced a pure tone at all. The vibrations at the holes should shift randomly and get lost in the noise. Even if phase slippage did produce a constant tone in a single hole, the whistles from the array of 4,225 holes should have been out of phase and the resulting sound less than 100 times louder than that from a single hole.
Apparently, Packard said, the vibrating holes somehow achieved synchrony, like crickets chirping in unison on a summer evening, amplifying the sound 4,000 times higher - loud enough to be heard above the background noise of the experiment.
"For 40 years, people have been trying to see something like this, but it has always been with single apertures," Hoskinson said. "Maybe it's true that you don't get coherent oscillations with a single aperture, but somehow, with an array of apertures, the noise is suppressed and you hear a coherent whistle."
"There was no reason to expect that. I still think it's amazing," Packard added.
The research by Packard, Hoskinson and post-doctoral fellow Thomas Haard is supported by the National Science Foundation and by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
strategofr wrote:
Warning! Kids: don't try this at home!
---Thanks for posting this fun tech article! I wish i was that smart so i could try cool stuff like that at home, but i'm just your average bear!
"---Thanks for posting this fun tech article! "
Welcome.
"Quantum whistle alert!"
:)
"A temperature of 2 Kelvin is the equivalent of minus [sic] 456 degrees Fahrenheit."
You'd think a University press office could manage to realize that "minus" is a verb while "negative" is an adjective. Or, as one of my math profs used to taunt me when I slipped up: "what's 'minus' number? I have no idea what that is...."
What am I to say, "It's really cool!"
Science PING
This public service announcement will run for about ten pings or until whenever I get bored posting it. :)
|
PING!
Does anyone here know why helium 3 is more a far more important isotope than helium 4?
It's a lot smaller than He4
I believe that it is the smallest gas particle, period.
(Hydrogen needs to be H2 to be stable. A single He atom is stable--noble gas thing--and He three is smaller than He four. Both asre smaller than H2)
I used a SIRU on one of my spacecraft. :-)
"The HRG uses a thin-walled quartz shell that is energized by an electrical field to produce an imperceptible vibration pattern within itself. This pattern is electrically sensed and used to determine the gyro's output parameters. The vibration is so minute that it creates virtually no internal stress and fatigue effects, leading to its unmatched reliability. Northrop Grumman is the exclusive producer of HRGs, which to date have accumulated more than 4,500,000 hours of operation in over 50 systems in space without a mission failure. "
http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.mhtml?d=67278
How much is worth an additional 2 Kelvins compared to Helium-3? Is that such a great breakthrough?
That's an American thing. I grew up with 'minus two degrees centrigrade', etc.
I doubt most people would agree it's more important, but near 0 K it has very different properties, because it's a fermion (spin 1/2) rather than a boson like He-4. It's also got an NMR signal, which He-4 does not have, so you can use it, e.g., to image lungs.
It's horribly rare and expensive, though; the best source of it is radioactive decay of the tritium in thermonuclear weapons.
"University press office"
You are right. It is the phraseology of a not-really-literate person. Unfortunately, the steep decline in literacy is seeping into every crack and crevass. I am appalled by various things I read in the Wall Street Journal (not counting political things here), including things parallel to your comment as well as routine, frequent errors in the explication of technical and scientific facts. Sloppiness and laziness---both in use of language and in thinking. The two go together. The product of a creativity-based, rule-shy learning experience.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.