Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Archaeologists Find Tomb Under Roman Forum
AP ^ | Jan 20th, 2006 | AP

Posted on 01/20/2006 2:48:28 PM PST by The_Republican

ROME - Archaeologists digging beneath the Roman Forum have discovered a 3,000-year-old tomb that pre-dates the birth of ancient Rome by several hundred years.

State TV Thursday night showed an excavation team removing vases from the tomb, which resembled a deep well.

Archaeologists were excavating under the level of the ancient forum, a popular tourist site, when they dug up the tomb, which they suspect is part of an entire necropolis, the Italian news agency ANSA reported.

"I am convinced that the excavations will bring more tombs to light," ANSA quoted Rome's archaeology commissioner, Eugenio La Rocca, as saying.

Also found inside the tomb was a funerary urn, ANSA said.

State TV quoted experts as saying the tomb appeared to date to about 1,000 B.C., meaning the people who constructed the necropolis pre-dated the ancient Romans by hundreds of years.

Legend has it that Rome was founded in 753 B.C. by Romulus and Remus, the twin sons of the god of war, Mars.

Last year, archaeologists who have been digging for some two decades in the forum said they believed they found evidence of a royal palace roughly dating to the period of the legendary founding.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1000bc; achaeology; ancientrome; godsgravesglyphs; rome; tomb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Exciting Find!
1 posted on 01/20/2006 2:48:30 PM PST by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

2 posted on 01/20/2006 2:50:29 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
It's also consistent with a persistent habit of paving over graveyards to build new public structures. After all, good, buildable space "downtown" anywhere has always been in short supply, and the dead, after all, really don't care.

Glad to see Rome's founders were so terribly human.

3 posted on 01/20/2006 2:50:40 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruoflaw

ping


4 posted on 01/20/2006 2:52:30 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
Legend has it that Rome was founded in 753 B.C. by Romulus and Remus, the twin sons of the god of war, Mars.

The idea of using the year of Christ's birth as the epoch year of the Julian Calendar was first proposed by the Monk Dionysius Exiguus in 525 AD. At the time, a variety of epoch years were in common use, with the year when Diocletian ascended to the office of Emperor of Rome being the most widely used. Although the Imperial and post-Imperial Romans counted time from various reference points that changed frequently, there was one "epoch date" that was canonically (albeit infrequently) used to unify all their various time counts: the date of the founding of the city of Rome (an era that was called "Ab Urbe Condita," Latin for "From the Founding of the City.") Dionysius explicity specified the year that would be the year 1 of the Anno Domini Era as the year 754 A.U.C. ("Ab Urbe Condita.")

5 posted on 01/20/2006 2:53:15 PM PST by sourcery (Either the Constitution trumps stare decisis, or else the Constitution is a dead letter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery

Thanks for dropping the knowledge!!!


6 posted on 01/20/2006 2:54:25 PM PST by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: billorites

She's not getting anywhere near my artifact!


7 posted on 01/20/2006 2:56:07 PM PST by DoughtyOne (01/11/06: Ted Kennedy becomes the designated driver and moral spokesperson for the Democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

This is cool. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.


8 posted on 01/20/2006 2:58:41 PM PST by DoughtyOne (01/11/06: Ted Kennedy becomes the designated driver and moral spokesperson for the Democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican; blam; SunkenCiv

BTTT


9 posted on 01/20/2006 2:58:51 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Tagline Repair Service. Let us fix those broken Taglines. Inquire within(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

bump


10 posted on 01/20/2006 3:02:33 PM PST by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

Romulus?

11 posted on 01/20/2006 3:08:08 PM PST by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites


"Brad Pitt, Womb Raider"


12 posted on 01/20/2006 3:11:56 PM PST by msnimje (Senate Democrats ----------- Sound and Furry Signifying INSIGNIFICANCE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

Do you have any idea where in the Forum this was located? My wife and I were just in Rome about 10 months ago. We spent half a day exploring the Forum. It extends over quite a vast area. Do they think there are burial sites throughout?


13 posted on 01/20/2006 3:14:13 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

So then who were these ancient pre-Roman people? Etruscans, colonizing Greeks, Gauls?


14 posted on 01/20/2006 3:16:02 PM PST by starbase (Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: starbase; stevem

Great questions. Maybe someone would enlighten us all.


15 posted on 01/20/2006 3:17:22 PM PST by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stinkerpot65

Remus??

16 posted on 01/20/2006 3:17:49 PM PST by The Chid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
1,000 B.C., meaning the people who constructed the necropolis pre-dated the ancient Romans by hundreds of years.

Etruscans, perhaps? Should be easy to identify, as Rome and the surrounding area is full of their artifacts, especially delightful at the Etruscan Museum. Anything other than Etruscan would be interesting indeed.

17 posted on 01/20/2006 3:23:25 PM PST by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Chid

Could it be?


18 posted on 01/20/2006 3:36:18 PM PST by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The Chid

Nah. Remus hangs out with Br'er Rabbit.


19 posted on 01/20/2006 3:39:29 PM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: starbase

I think there were lots of tribes on the It. penninsula before Rome.


20 posted on 01/20/2006 3:48:05 PM PST by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson