Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Clinton calls for sanctions against Iran
The Daily Princetonian ^ | 1/19/06 | Ross Liemer

Posted on 01/20/2006 4:20:46 AM PST by anniegetyourgun

Repeatedly referring to a need for "new vision and leadership" in U.S. policy toward the Middle East, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) called Wednesday for United Nations sanctions against Iran and further global advances in women's rights, and urged optimism for a peaceful resolution to the Israel-Palestine conflict.

"We cannot and should not — must not — permit Iran to build or acquire nuclear weapons," Clinton said in a speech before a capacity crowd in Richardson Auditorium. (See full text.) "In order to prevent that from occurring, we must have more support vigorously and publicly expressed by China and Russia, and we must move as quickly as feasible for sanctions in the United Nations."

Though never mentioning President Bush by name, Clinton strongly criticized the current administration's policy toward Iran. "I believe that we lost critical time in dealing with Iran because the White House chose to downplay the threats and to outsource the negotiations," Clinton said.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailyprincetonian.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bs; disingenuous; hillary2008; iran; shillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Gotta hand it to this lying hypocrite - she's got nerve to claim the administration "chose to downplay the threats" of Iran. After all, she runs with the same lib/dem pack that gasped in horror when this prez mentioned the triumverate threat of Iraq, Iran, and NK in is first SOTU address years ago.

She makes me want to puke.

1 posted on 01/20/2006 4:20:50 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

"Sen. Clinton calls for sanctions against Iran" .......
because Sen. Clinton now hears John Spencer and he has her attention. Are you listening Mr. Hannity, Mr. Levin? Spencer is the warrior you have been waiting for.


2 posted on 01/20/2006 4:28:14 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (We will never murtha to the terrorists. Bring home the troops means bring home the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

She has the nerve to call for sanctions against Iran after he puppet Bill ignored the issue of Iran and nukes for 8 years... And blame the situation on Bush...

She doesn't stand a chance in hell of being elected President in 08. The Democrat party is truly imploding because of liberals like Hillary...


3 posted on 01/20/2006 4:28:27 AM PST by BusiDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

Somebody tell that calculating b*tch to STFU.

Er, looks like I just did.


4 posted on 01/20/2006 4:28:37 AM PST by martin_fierro (00111100 00100000 01111100 00111010 00101001 01111110)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
"We cannot and should not — must not — permit Iran to build or acquire nuclear weapons"

What she really meant to say was 'must not - permit Iran to oppose feminism.' The nuclear issues are far less important. If it weren't for their treatment of women she would support export of missile technology to them, like she and her co-president husband did to the chinese.

5 posted on 01/20/2006 4:29:17 AM PST by zipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

Maybe Hillary should ask Bill why he said he so admires Iran.

Here is what Clinton said at a meeting on the margins of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, just a few weeks ago: “Iran today is, in a sense, the only country where progressive ideas enjoy a vast constituency. It is there that the ideas that I subscribe to are defended by a majority.”

And here is what Clinton had to say in a recent television interview with Charlie Rose:

“Iran is the only country in the world that has now had six elections since the first election of President Khatami (in 1997). (It is) the only one with elections, including the United States, including Israel, including you name it, where the liberals, or the progressives, have won two-thirds to 70 percent of the vote in six elections: Two for president; two for the Parliament, the Majlis; two for the mayoralties. In every single election, the guys I identify with got two-thirds to 70 percent of the vote. There is no other country in the world I can say that about, certainly not my own.”

http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/1356367/posts?page=59


6 posted on 01/20/2006 4:30:33 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

calculating??? Please, don't give her to much credit. Hillary may act like the smartest person in the room but she is only following an old worn-out playbook. How smart is that???


7 posted on 01/20/2006 4:30:54 AM PST by BusiDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

She wants the sanctions cause that bitch wants oil to hit $100+, stock market to tank etc......

We just need to let Isreal bomb the hell out of their sites


8 posted on 01/20/2006 4:31:18 AM PST by KavMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zipper

To the left, women's rights means abortion


9 posted on 01/20/2006 4:31:54 AM PST by BusiDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

" further global advances in women's rights"

I guess women voting and Iraq and Afghanistan means nothing to the Beast.


10 posted on 01/20/2006 4:33:50 AM PST by Rebelbase (I love global warming in the winter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

Isn't she just precious?


11 posted on 01/20/2006 4:33:54 AM PST by Past Your Eyes (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

She has no problem taking money from Iranians who support the current regime there though. What a immoral hypocrite!


12 posted on 01/20/2006 4:34:08 AM PST by moonman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

When the hell hounds on the left start biting at her ankles for this,she will make a speech somewhere suggesting,but not quite saying,that President Bush should be impeached for the NSA protecting our security.


13 posted on 01/20/2006 4:35:45 AM PST by carlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

14 posted on 01/20/2006 4:36:50 AM PST by maggief (Hillary!/Belafonte '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
In every single election, the guys I identify with got two-thirds to 70 percent of the vote.

What a wonderful sound bite.

As far as Hillary is concerned, she is going to get her ass handed to her in the primaries. She is like Benedict Arnold in that the Americans hated his guts and the British saw him as untrustworthy because he betrayed his people.

15 posted on 01/20/2006 4:37:21 AM PST by normy (Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

Don't suppose this has anything to do with her being outted in reference to the donations she recieved from pro Iran Mullah groups do you?


16 posted on 01/20/2006 4:39:42 AM PST by Post-Neolithic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
How fast she tries to dilute her primary colors, after all as co-president her stated foreign policy was "equalize all nations" and nuclear was the equalizer.

How convenient these many years later she points her accusing finger at the very policies she and her hubby planted throughout this globe.
17 posted on 01/20/2006 4:44:00 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

Hillary, Will you suggest that Marc Rich advise the UN on sanctions against Iran?


18 posted on 01/20/2006 4:46:34 AM PST by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

As far as nukes being the equalizer, don't forget all the B.S. about Iran needing nukes to defend themselves against U.S. aggression... And all the B.S. about the U.S. getting rid of all our nukes to make the world a safer and less hateful world...

Hillary is such a fake,,, she can run from her record, but she can't hide, and come 08 the people will remember...


19 posted on 01/20/2006 4:47:05 AM PST by BusiDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

Currently, approximately 80% of Iranian oppose the mullahs. So, let's impose sanctions and punish the 80% that otherwise might overthrow the mullahs with our help? Sheesh, we might as well bomb Iran.


20 posted on 01/20/2006 4:49:08 AM PST by Nephi (Illegal immigration is the flip side of the globalist free trade coin. Bush is a globalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson