Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Leahy, Salazar to Oppose Alito
Yahoo (AP) ^ | 1/19/2006 | JESSE J. HOLLAND

Posted on 01/19/2006 1:47:52 PM PST by The_Victor

WASHINGTON - Two Democrats who supported Chief Justice John Roberts said Thursday they would oppose Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito in next week's Senate vote.

ADVERTISEMENT

The conservative judge is expected to be confirmed, but with fewer votes than the 78 Roberts got in September.

Democratic Sens. Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Ken Salazar of Colorado both questioned whether Alito would be independent of President Bush and the executive branch in his future rulings.

"At a time when the president is seizing unprecedented power, the Supreme Court needs to act as a check and to provide balance," Leahy, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in a speech at Georgetown University's law school. "Based on the hearing and his record, I have no confidence that Judge Alito would provide that check and balance."

Added Salazar in a statement: "Judge Alito would place too much power in the hands of the president of the United States, at the cost of the protective system of checks and balances built into our Constitution.

The Judiciary Committee, which has 10 Republicans and eight Democrats — is expected to approve Alito's nomination Tuesday in a party-line vote. The full Senate is expected to debate and vote on the nomination that same week, with its Republican majority confirming the federal appeals judge.

Leahy, Salazar and Max Baucus of Montana — who announced his opposition to Alito on Wednesday — were three of the 22 Democrats who voted for Roberts' confirmation as the replacement for the late Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, a conservative.

Alito is not expected to get that much support from the Senate's 44-member Democratic caucus. He was picked by Bush as the replacement for retiring moderate Sandra Day O'Connor, who was the swing vote on contentious issues such as abortion and affirmative action during her career on the court.

Several other Democrats are opposing Alito, including Tom Harkin of Iowa, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts and Barbara Mikulski of Maryland.

Sen. Ben Nelson (news, bio, voting record) of Nebraska is the only Democrat to announce that he will vote for Alito's confirmation next week. He also voted for Roberts' confirmation.

None of the Senate's 55 Republicans have announced opposition to Alito. Most _if not all — of them are expected to vote for his confirmation. They all voted for Roberts.

Independent Sen. Jim Jeffords of Vermont has not announced how he'll vote.

Alito is continuing to visit senators, spending time Thursday with Tom Carper, D-Del., and new Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J. Carper and Menendez have not taken positions on Alito's nomination. "I have reservations," Menendez said.

Sens. John Sununu, R-N.H., and John Warner, R-Va., announced their support for Alito after meeting with him Thursday.

"He understands the law and the Constitution extremely well, and I think one of the abilities he showed was to clearly describe how he ruled, why he ruled, and what factors were critical to particular cases," Sununu said. "That's an indication that his service on the court and his view of the Constitution is rooted in principle."

Added Warner: "In my view, Judge Alito's strong record and experience, coupled with his appearance before the Judiciary Committee, eliminates any question of the existence of extraordinary circumstances that would justify denying him confirmation by the Senate."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitovote; johnwarner; kensbeenaslutsofar; leahy; salazar; scotus; sununu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: DarthVader

But he's not in as much trouble as sheets is


21 posted on 01/19/2006 2:03:32 PM PST by saveliberty (Proud to be Head Snowflake, Bushbot and a new member of Sam's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: The_Victor

Bill Owens is watching you Ken Salazar.


23 posted on 01/19/2006 2:04:15 PM PST by Reagan Man (Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Man that salazar really hoodwinked the hoodwinkables in Colorado.


24 posted on 01/19/2006 2:04:27 PM PST by samadams2000 (Remember our Founding Fathers were REAL men- Unlike today's Rinos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Salazar is a lying, corrupt LULAC Democrat.


25 posted on 01/19/2006 2:04:45 PM PST by Luke21 (Political correctness is the insane religion that runs this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Coors would have lost a one-man race with himself. He ran a horrible campaign.


26 posted on 01/19/2006 2:05:53 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (None genuine without my signature)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

Leahy was hoping for Judge Cashman to be nominated-- Salazar for Ward Churchill.


27 posted on 01/19/2006 2:06:00 PM PST by admiralsn (I believe God only gives three answers to prayer: Yes | Not yet | I have something better in mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luke21

Any bets on which two will announce opposition tomorrow... and the next day...


28 posted on 01/19/2006 2:07:11 PM PST by Ingtar (Understanding is a three-edged sword : your side, my side, and the truth in between ." -- Kosh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

And how is it that he won the primary?


29 posted on 01/19/2006 2:08:10 PM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader
Salaazar is from Colorado which is a red state.

And he's part of the Gang of 14. But he just got elected, so he probably figures he can rely on the electorate to forget before he's up for reelection.

Just think, if he'd been defeated we'd have Pete Coors as our senator.

30 posted on 01/19/2006 2:08:31 PM PST by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Salazar is a louse who campaigned as a conservative democrat.

Why do people keep believing them?

31 posted on 01/19/2006 2:08:51 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: William Creel

alot of freepers are trying to elect casey


32 posted on 01/19/2006 2:09:12 PM PST by philsfan24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000
Salazar had the support of more than a few republicans.

He ran a campaign pretending to be honorable.

We know better!

33 posted on 01/19/2006 2:09:52 PM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

Put the screws to him and see if he caves. If he doesn't you have ammo to remove him and replace him with Coors or Bill Owens.


34 posted on 01/19/2006 2:11:28 PM PST by DarthVader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Perhaps his brother will feel the wrath of the good citizens of Colorado.

Or is his brother's district safe?

35 posted on 01/19/2006 2:11:31 PM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
Club for Growth just announced that they are supporting a democrat for congress.

I will never ever donate one penny to Club for Growth again.

36 posted on 01/19/2006 2:12:20 PM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Club for Growth just announced that they are supporting a democrat for congress.

What?!? More info, please...

37 posted on 01/19/2006 2:14:13 PM PST by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter
Washington, D.C. - The political action arm of Club for Growth, the nation's leading free-market advocacy organization with over 34,000 members, today endorsed sitting Democratic Congressman Henry Cuellar (TX-28) in his bid for re-election to his San Antonio-based House seat. He is running against former Democratic Congressman Ciro Rodriguez and Victor Morales in the Democratic primary. This is the first ever endorsement of a Democratic candidate by the Club for Growth PAC.

"By voting for CAFTA, to repeal the Death Tax, to prevent huge tax increases, and for supporting school choice, Congressman Cuellar has become one of the House's most pro-economic growth Democrats," said Club for Growth President Pat Toomey. "The House of Representatives would be better off with more Democrats - and even some more Republicans - who demonstrate Rep. Cuellar's commitment to their constituents' prosperity through economic freedom. It is particularly noteworthy that Rep. Cuellar cast these votes for a stronger economy despite intense pressure not to by some in his party."

"Former Congressman Ciro Rodriguez's record is a prime example of what we don't need more of in Washington," Toomey said. "During his eight years in Congress, he established one of the most anti-growth voting records, consistently supporting higher taxes, wasteful government spending, and a protectionist anti-trade agenda. He even voted against allowing poor families the freedom to choose the school their children could attend."

"While Congressman Cuellar's record isn't perfect, it is far better than his opponents' and his demonstrated commitment to pro-growth principles over politics is exactly what the Club for Growth PAC looks for in Congressional candidates, regardless of party affiliation," concluded Toomey, "It's why we're committed to helping elect him, and more legislators like him, to Congress."

http://www.clubforgrowth.org/blog/archives/028225print.html
http://www.clubforgrowth.org/blog/


38 posted on 01/19/2006 2:19:40 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

Say it ain't so!


39 posted on 01/19/2006 2:20:02 PM PST by Buck W. (Yesterday's Intelligentsia are today's Irrelevantsia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thanks, Cboldt.


40 posted on 01/19/2006 2:21:02 PM PST by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson