Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio Supreme Court hears eminent domain arguments
Ohio e-CPA Weekly, Issue 3 ^ | Jan. 16-20 , 2006

Posted on 01/19/2006 4:43:19 AM PST by mr_hammer

Ohio Supreme Court hears eminent domain arguments

The Ohio Supreme Court last week heard arguments challenging a local government are right of eminent domain to acquire private property for the benefit of commercial development.

The court is being asked to overturn rulings favoring the city of Norwood's acquisition of private property from unwilling sellers to be developed by private investors - not the city. Lawyers for the city argue the private development project would generate more tax revenue for the municipality.

A divided U.S. Supreme Court last year ruled in favor of a government's right to eminent domain in such instances. Since then, the Ohio General Assembly enacted legislation (SB 167)placing a one-year moratorium on the use of eminent domain to acquire non-blighted land for private development. The legislature intends to study the economic development impacts of the practice.

Ohio is believed to be the first state to challenge eminent domain since the U.S. Supreme Court ruling. The Society's governmental affairs team will continue to monitor the progress of the lawsuit.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: development; eminentdomain; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Stark_GOP
If a developer were to buy your home a stick a pink flamingo in the front lawn, he would have increased the value of the property.

Ironically, due to Katrina, you hit the nail on the head!

21 posted on 01/19/2006 6:35:41 AM PST by houeto (Mr. President, close our borders now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: houeto

"Ironically, due to Katrina, you hit the nail on the head!"
---
They are not letting some people in to rebuild. Why?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1558035/posts

So they can give the land to a developer to make a killing from it.


22 posted on 01/19/2006 6:48:38 AM PST by Stark_GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Stark_GOP
They are not letting some people in to rebuild. Why?

Despite Nagin's 'chocolate' comments (hot air), they don't WANT those people back. They put a four month moratorium on permit issuing. What does that tell you. Keep them out for four more months and they will never come back. Right now they have the crime rate in the city's history!

23 posted on 01/19/2006 8:24:18 AM PST by houeto (Mr. President, close our borders now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Stark_GOP

LOWEST crime rate (is this Monday?)


24 posted on 01/19/2006 8:25:28 AM PST by houeto (Mr. President, close our borders now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: houeto

Must be. You didn't nail me for my pink flamingo comment.


25 posted on 01/19/2006 8:46:59 AM PST by Stark_GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Stark_GOP
Must be. You didn't nail me for my pink flamingo comment.

That's 'cause I like 'em! Guess it's the redneck in me. :-)

26 posted on 01/19/2006 6:47:51 PM PST by houeto (Mr. President, close our borders now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson