Posted on 01/17/2006 11:24:31 AM PST by PatrickHenry
A rural school district agreed to stop teaching a religion-based alternative to evolution as part of a court settlement filed Tuesday, a legal group said.
Frazier Mountain High School will stop teaching a philosophy class discussing the theory of "intelligent design" this week and won't teach it in the future, said Ayesha N. Khan, legal director for Americans United for Separation of Church and State.
Officials at the El Tejon Unified School District were not immediately available for comment.
A federal judge in Fresno had been scheduled to hold a hearing Tuesday afternoon on whether to halt the class midway through the monthlong winter term.
A group of parents sued the district last week, saying it violated the constitutional separation of church and state by offering "Philosophy of Design," a course taught by a minister's wife that advanced the theory that life is so complex it must have been created by God.
"The course was designed to advance religious theories on the origins of life, including creationism and its offshoot, 'intelligent design,'" said the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court.
In a landmark lawsuit, Americans United for Separation of Church and State had successfully blocked Dover, Pa., schools last month from teaching intelligent design in science courses. [Kitzmiller et al. v Dover Area School District et al..]
El Tejon school officials had claimed the subject was proper for a philosophy class.
The high school in the Tehachapi Mountains about 75 miles north of Los Angeles draws 500 students from a dozen small communities.
Sharon Lemburg, a social studies teacher and soccer coach who was teaching "Philosophy of Design," defended the course in a letter to the weekly Mountain Enterprise.
"I believe this is the class that the Lord wanted me to teach," she wrote.
Similar battles are being fought in Georgia and Kansas. Critics of "intelligent design" say it is biblical creationism in disguise, but defenders argue it is based on science and doesn't require adherence to any religious belief.
But, so far on this thread, God has not accused of lying about relativity.
Revelation is still more sure than imagination!
yes, I read it.....I even copied and pasted the link for the court case for future reference. It's going to get more and more interesting. This is only the start of the "humor".....:)
" But, so far on this thread, God has not accused of lying about relativity."
That's because creationists haven't studied relativity very hard.
"Revelation is still more sure than imagination!"
But still less than objective evidence.
I mean the intent isn't first and foremost to provide the best education for students, it's to get somebody's religion into the public schools.
I have never seen any credible evidence that "evolutionists" (is there such a group) have a political agenda. As to the political agenda of creationists, I direct your attention to the testimony of the Dover school board members, who lied under oath about their intentions to try and sneak past the Establishment clause.
Oh! What was Darwin expecting?
The peppered moth studies are valid science.
Let's see we started with moths - we ended up with moths - yep that does it evolution all right!
Or of course it might just be that genes that were present to begin with, expressed themselves.
Nebraska man is a dramatic example how if you presume evolution you find evidence to support your framework - but then you might just be being played for the fool.
Oh, please!
The substance of this "philosophy" class consisted of videos presenting young-earth, flood-geology creationism. I've followed the antievolution movement for many years, and have studied its history extensively. Young-earth, flood-geology creationism has ALWAYS been identified -- by its own advocates and practitioners -- as either "Biblical Creationism" or "Scientific Creationism" or "Creation Science" or some formulation of the sort. It's never, ever been put forward as a subject of "philosophy".
You can't possibly believe this utterly transparent dodge. Have you no shame? Or is any level of obvious deceit and baloney acceptable if it advances the cause?
Only because they think they can twist it into some critique of the scientific method or scientists themselves.
It's extremely ironic - Nebraska Man is a great example of how the system works. Nebraska Man shows that poor work gets exposed.
I suspect they don't actually know what Nebraska Man really was, any more than they understand the peppered moth experiment was all about.
Silly Stultis.
You know it doesn't count as "lying" if they only lie to infidels....
Bummer...........now that the Court of Appeals has shot down the ACLU's mantra "separation of church and state" and have upheld the right to Freedom OF Religion instead of Freedom FROM Religion.
Why is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely-graduated organic chain; and this is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against the theory. -- Charles Darwin
The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology. -- Gould
If the fossil record is as expected - why abandon Darwinism for punctuated equilibrium?
In the end the emperor has no clothes and God gets the last laugh!
http://www.reviewevolution.com/press/pressRelease_LeakedPBSMemo.php
Well, perhaps some evolutionists have a political agenda.
Sunday school bible "study" ...
I imagine God is getting a pretty good chuckle even now. The Bible says "the fool has said in his heart there is no God". What's great is that we will all know for sure one way or another, won't we?
She certainly has been more discrete in her affairs with other women.
The "man" part of "Nebraska Man" stems entirely from a popular article, and an accompanying drawing, written by an overly enthusiastic British scientist who never examined the actual fossil. The original researchers in America dismissed the British drawing and reconstruction as "a figment of the imagination of no scientific value, and undoubtedly inaccurate".
The only proposal the American scientists ever put forward was that the tooth appeared to be that of an APE (not a "man") which maybe possessed a few incipient human affinities, although the fossil was far too worn to be definitive about such details.
You may be looking at this all wrong. The alleged "discovery" that Hesperopithecus dawsonii was "really" only a pig's tooth might be the nefarious evolution conspiracy cover up; and you've fallen for it! You see an ape in North America would really be evidence AGAINST evolution and for creationism, since apes supposedly evolved in Africa long after the continents separated. Apes should have never been here on the evolutionary scheme!
How about if they want to teach the Bible as it relates to history, art, geography? Would that be constitutional?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.