Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats abort deal on Alito vote
The Washington Times ^ | January 17, 2006 | Charles Hurt

Posted on 01/16/2006 11:20:52 PM PST by msnimje

Senate Democrats have scrapped a "good-faith" agreement they made two months ago to allow the Judiciary Committee to vote today on the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr.

"This is a new low in our confirmation process," said Sen. John Cornyn, Texas Republican. "Not only because it is virtually unprecedented, but also because it reflects a breach of trust."

According to Judiciary Committee rules, either party can stall a nomination in committee for only one week, meaning that Judge Alito's nomination will likely be approved by the panel during an executive committee meeting next Tuesday.

The entire Senate will take up the nomination no later than Jan. 25 and will remain on it until Judge Alito's nomination is voted up or down, said Eric Ueland, chief of staff for Majority Leader Bill Frist.

"Justice delayed will not be a justice denied, as Sam Alito will receive a fair up-or-down vote and join the Supreme Court before month's end," he said. "Any remaining threats to filibuster are just filibluster."

Although Democratic leaders have not ruled out an attempt to filibuster the nomination, such a maneuver seems increasingly unlikely.

~snip~

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitohearings; alitovote; badfaith; cowardly; cowards; dishonarable; donottrustdonks; duh; girliemen; justicealito; kennedyisadrunk; leahylied; liars; lying; neasownesdemocrats; nofaith; obstructionistdems; reneged; scotus; shame; shameful; shameondemocrats; trustthemnot; wimps; wordmeansnothing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Southack
'So who's that Democratic Senator from Florida?'

I thought Nelson was one, and Harris was running against him.

41 posted on 01/17/2006 3:14:37 AM PST by mathluv (Bushbot, Snowflake, Dittohead ---- Bring it on!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

The Democrats are an enemy in retreat. They fell into the trap of fighting a battle on a field not of their choosing, and after a frontal assault on a well-prepared and defended fortress, they were routed.

They are now buying time: attempting to triage and save the politically wounded. They've got to determine who of their ilk absolutely has to vote against Alito, and who has to be allowed to support his nomination.


42 posted on 01/17/2006 3:15:11 AM PST by soxfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Lying SOB; it was on VIDEOTAPE, FGS.

You know it doesn't matter, Howlin. If it HAD been in writing, they'd be parsing the words and say that wasn't binding either. Make a deal with a snake and you get lots of hissing and slithering because that's its inherent nature. Did the RINO 7 really expect them to act like honorable people?

43 posted on 01/17/2006 4:05:14 AM PST by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Southack

The Democrat Senator from Florida is Nelson.


44 posted on 01/17/2006 4:06:53 AM PST by Chunga (Mock The Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
This tactic means there is a chance that the parental notification law or end of life case will be decided by then.

I was of the impression that the court was in recess until February.

45 posted on 01/17/2006 4:13:49 AM PST by IamConservative (Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most times will pick himself up and carry on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Intersting that they chose the word "abort" to use in this headline. That is in essence what this is about. I canlive with a one week delay provided the Republicans pound the message that the Democrats cannot be trusted with something as simple as a gentlemans agreement.


46 posted on 01/17/2006 4:16:06 AM PST by IamConservative (Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most times will pick himself up and carry on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative
I was of the impression that the court was in recess until February.

During most of the Alito hearings, I had been too, and asserted the same thing. Then I looked it up to check my claim, and found out that the Court heard cases last week, and is hearing cases this week. The Court is on recess after that, until February 21.

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/.../monthlyargumentcaljanuary2006.pdf
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/.../monthlyargumentcalfebruary2006.pdf

47 posted on 01/17/2006 4:21:52 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

What happens now with Frist's comment that he would keep the Senate in session to vote on Alito if the Dem's stall the committee past the 20th? I think I remember a thread about that from this past Saturday?


48 posted on 01/17/2006 4:28:43 AM PST by babaloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: babaloo
What happens now with Frist's comment that he would keep the Senate in session to vote on Alito if the Dem's stall the committee past the 20th? I think I remember a thread about that from this past Saturday?

Frist can't schedule Senate floor events around the nomination until after it is voted out of Committee. Right now, we think that will be on the 24th.

Frist has said that he will make the Alito nomination the sole business of the Senate from the time it is voted out of Committee until it is voted up or down. There are a few possible procedural avenues upon the nomination being voted out of Committee, including a unanimous consent agreement from the DEMs to vote up or down without invoking a cloture motion.

49 posted on 01/17/2006 4:41:30 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

what has sickened me about the whole confirmation process has been the sheer ponderous PREDICTABILITY of everything the Donks have said, postured, done.


50 posted on 01/17/2006 4:46:06 AM PST by King Prout (many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Breach of trust?

Republican Senators have got to be the most naive bunch of doofuses I have ever seen.


51 posted on 01/17/2006 4:47:01 AM PST by ovrtaxt (I looked for common sense with a telescope. All I could see was the moon of Uranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Excellent. Here's hoping he keeps his promise. I guess we should prepare for the Dims whining that "Important business for the American people is being set aside due to Republican's efforts to install a neanderthal to the Supreme Court." They are disgusting.


52 posted on 01/17/2006 4:49:14 AM PST by babaloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Didn't the senile Specter allow them to add the one week delay to the START of the hearings, which were to start in December originally? I seem to recall that. If that's true, they got two delays, which is NOT in the Senate's arcane "rules". Specter is such a loser, and Bill Frist is no Senate leader. They both need to be replaced.


53 posted on 01/17/2006 4:50:06 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

The Democratic senator from Florida is Bill Nelson.....but I hope not for long!!


54 posted on 01/17/2006 6:22:57 AM PST by jch10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

"You f'd up, you trusted us." - Democrats.


55 posted on 01/17/2006 6:24:07 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
Democrats acting in bad faith?

Shocked! Shocked!..etc.

56 posted on 01/17/2006 6:24:24 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
Senate Democrats have scrapped a "good-faith" agreement they made

In other news, the sun rose this morning.

57 posted on 01/17/2006 6:24:27 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
Didn't the senile Specter allow them to add the one week delay to the START of the hearings...

Yes, that is basically what this article is about.
58 posted on 01/17/2006 6:29:40 AM PST by msnimje (Senate Democrats ----------- Sound and Furry Signifying INSIGNIFICANCE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Talking_Mouse
I am from NY and I do not deserver either Chuck or Hillary. I have voted for neither ever in my life.

Under our system, you individually do not but you as a member of the electorate that votes these clowns in, you do.

If every Republican in New York worked to educated the ignorant classes that vote these clowns in you would have different leadership.
59 posted on 01/17/2006 6:34:48 AM PST by msnimje (Senate Democrats ----------- Sound and Furry Signifying INSIGNIFICANCE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Filth.


60 posted on 01/17/2006 7:06:08 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson