It's Hillary presidency, Bush told

Insight ^ | 17 January 2006

[lexington minuteman 1775]

Meanwhile today, WH spokesperson Scott McClellend announced that GW will seek a run in 2008 saying that "He realizes that the Democrats were right and he stole the 2000 election, so that 2008 will be his official second term."
Leading Democratic canidates were so busy having an orgasmic adreniline dump could no longer be reached for comment. /sarcasm on/made up whole thing if you want me to source it.LOL!

[Giant Conservative]

Defeatism is the primary weapon used within an organization in an effort to weaken it. In this case, clearly some are seeking to make a Hilary Presidency a self-fulfilling prophecy. In actuality, she's the worst big-name candidate the Democrats could run. So long as the GOP nominates a man of principle, he will win.

[eyespysomething]

I just heard a clip of her screeching at a MLK Jr event. People will not vote to listen to that for 4 years.

Shallow? Yes. But I am sure of that.

[JoeGar]

It's unlikely that a Senator will win the Presidency. However, if I had to bet on a Senator, it would be on George Allen of Virgina.

[Toespi]

Typical liberal BS, nothing different. Put the spin out there, truth or not, then look forward to a percentage of the sheeples, going for it.

[reagan_fanatic]

What a pantload.

Hillary has about as much a chance of being elected President as Ted kennedy does.

[EagleUSA]

This is just as bad and phony as the Gina Davis TV show...

[wjersey]

Remember the MSM had Dean as the next president

[farlander]

This has got to be the most BS I've ever seen in a single article. What a load of bull. Did I mention this is crap ?

[sauropod]

"White House strategists" are the main problem!

[avital2]

i hope we're setting the trap for Hillary to fall into. Bush 43 knows when to hold 'em, and would never fold 'em. never.

[Giant Conservative]

Rudy is a social liberal. For the GOP to nominate a social liberal like him would be party suicide: doing so is the only way the GOP can lose in 2008, because the conservative base will not support a pro-abortion, pro-gay candidate like that.

[kcar]

She's got an annoying drone except when she's feigning excitement and then she screeches, and she'd have to try to "get exciting" alot in a real campaign. She also has a frumpy bottom that is also forecast to be inflating even further by 2008. Even with a friendly media all angles can't be covered.

This is just media hype along the "inevitability of Hillary" theme.

[xzins]

The republican candidate most likely to win in 2008 against Hillary:

1. It must be someone who already has ready and willing support from the alternative media....Fox, Talk Radio, Blog, Internet, Church

2. It must be someone who already has a name-recognition that rivals that of Hillary -- there can be no time wasted on building a name and reputation.

3. It must be someone extremely proficient in front of a camera and microphone.


A. Dick Cheney
B. John McCain
C. Condi Rice
D. Rudi Giulianni
E. Allen
F. Frist
G. Gingrich
H.

[princess leah]

I have a strong feeling it'll be Rudy G.

[leadpenny]

I agree with the "screeching" part, but with Germany, Chile and Liberia all installing women heads of state recently, Hillary thinks she is going to ride the big wave into the Ovary Office..

[babaloo]

I saw your post after I sent mine. She is Nurse Rached without the charm.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

All the more reason to see to it that the 100 pages of Hillary references are restored to the Barrett Report.