Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chuck's Chance (Dem drug flash-back alert)
New York Magazine ^ | 1/15/06 | Heilemann

Posted on 01/16/2006 7:35:27 AM PST by pabianice

Whatever happens with Judge Alito, Schumer is likely the Democratic winner. It’s all part of his secret plan for senatorial domination.

Chuck Schumer reclines on the couch in his office on Capitol Hill, his stockinged feet propped up on the coffee table, a carton of takeout Chinese food perched precariously on his belly. It’s late one night a few days before the start of the confirmation hearings for Samuel Alito, and Schumer is laying out the objectives of each side in the high-stakes game. For the Democrats, Schumer says, the goal of the hearings “is almost metaphysical, or epistemological: It’s to bring out the true Samuel Alito. And his job is to say as little as possible, but enough so that the public doesn’t feel that he’s answering nothing.”

A little more than one week later, we all know how that worked out. For three solid, nearly interminable days, the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Democrats poked and prodded at Alito: about Roe v. Wade, privacy, federalism, executive power, and much else. And though they succeeded in demonstrating that Alito is charmless, humorless, and tedious—that he is, in short, no John Roberts—they failed to reveal anything about his judicial philosophy or ideological inclinations that wasn’t already manifestly clear from his record long before the hearings began. Instead, their main accomplishment was to reveal themselves as befuddled, toothless gasbags.

Except for Schumer, that is.

Indeed, for Schumer, the Alito hearings marked yet another step in his improbable political ascent: from New York’s favorite schlepper senator to national Democratic macher. Not even two years ago, people wondered if Schumer would run for governor. Now you watch him and wonder why he ever even considered it. See Chuck whisper in the ear of Minority Leader Harry Reid. See Chuck take over the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee—and with a zap of his manic energy and pragmatism help make it borderline plausible that the party might retake the Senate in this year’s midterm elections. Mention to Chuck that 2005 was an excellent year for him—and listen to him crow.

“Yeah, it was! DSCC was great. We met every goal. Every one of our incumbents is up by ten points—and all of them are doing Chuck Schumer’s Sunday press conferences. I told Maria Cantwell [Washington], Bill Nelson [Florida], and Ben Nelson [Nebraska], you’ve gotta get out there and do it! You can’t just issue stuff from Washington! I took some flak for backing [Pennsylvania pro-life Democrat] Bob Casey, but now everyone agrees that was a great move. So, yeah, it’s been a good year for me.”

Important as the DSCC is to Schumer’s rise within the Democratic leadership, his role on the Judiciary Committee is equally so. Inside the Senate, it’s a source of institutional status and intellectual credibility. And in moments like the Alito hearings, it offers him an invaluable national stage. “Chuck thinks that he can be the Senate Democratic leader some day—that’s what he’s aiming for,” says a senior party operative.

Schumer is at pains to insist that neither politics nor personal ambition fuels his zest for being in the thick of judicial-nomination battles. When I ask him about the intersection of his roles on the Judiciary Committee and at the DSCC, he scrunches up his face and shakes his head. “I started on this crusade before the DSCC was ever a gleam in my eye,” he says. “My basic rule in politics is, have an internal gyroscope, do what you think is right. And then try to craft the message and the politics to help it happen.”

Among some liberal judicial activists, of course, Schumer’s gyroscope has often been seen as an instrument that guides him inexorably toward the TV cameras—and away from the substantive nitty-gritty. “He has the smarts, he has the staff, he has the legal background,” says one former Senate staffer. “But he’s more worried about how he looks than if he’s going to win, and he’s more concerned about how he sounds than if he makes his point.”

During the Roberts hearings, in particular, complaints about Schumer’s straddling the fence, performing delicate political calculations, were legion on the left. “The fact that he took so long to make up his mind about Roberts was a critical factor in the low vote total against the nomination,” says another activist, still irked at the memory.

“I was torn,” Schumer says. “When you sat down with John Roberts, you liked the guy. I felt like I was back at law school. I liked debating these issues with him. I learned from him. And even though I voted against him, I still like him!”

Schumer’s reaction to Alito, by contrast, was altogether less giddy. In their single meeting (“I requested three meetings with Roberts, and got them easily and promptly”), the judge came across as “less open, more defensive,” Schumer says. And when he acquainted himself with Alito’s past rulings and writings, he saw an uncomfortable parallel with a prior nominee: “I don’t think he’s as far over as Bork, but he has elements of Bork in him...”

Click site for complete article.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitohearings; schumer; senatedems
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 01/16/2006 7:35:30 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Schmuckie Chewmer has elements of Stalin/McGovern/Abzug in him.


2 posted on 01/16/2006 7:41:19 AM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

"We got a plan, a secret plan." Sheese.


3 posted on 01/16/2006 7:42:47 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

"Indeed, for Schumer, the Alito hearings marked yet another step in his improbable political ascent:"

How did the east coast get better drugs then the west? Clearly the NYM has access to them.


4 posted on 01/16/2006 7:42:53 AM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

In his TV interviews, I've noticed that Schumer always talks with disdain about the "far Left" and positions himself as representing "mainstream" America. Fortunately, his oiliness, and basic dishonesty, comes through loud and clear.


5 posted on 01/16/2006 7:48:41 AM PST by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
New York is well-represented in Congress.

Primmadonnas all.

6 posted on 01/16/2006 7:50:12 AM PST by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (expell the fat arrogant carcasses of Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Chuckir labors under one major problem..he is the only "junior" senior senator in the Senate...

But here's one prediction I think you can take to the bank...the Dems know the Alito hearing was a disaster for them..and the guy in charge of the last two..Leahy...well, he's waaay more than pathetic..So he has to go...becuase the Dems won't junk the seniority system..Leahy will have to step aside for some reason or other..and Schumer moved up to ranking member..

7 posted on 01/16/2006 7:50:37 AM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Important as the DSCC is to Schumer’s rise within the Democratic leadership, his role on the Judiciary Committee is equally so. Inside the Senate, it’s a source of institutional status and intellectual credibility.

If what we witnessed out of Judiciary in the hearings is an example of intellectual credibility, the nation is in great peril. Even this Chuckie suckup piece calls the committee "toothless gasbags", hardly the trademark of intellectualism. What a bunch of creaking brains there must be in the Senate to hold toothless gasbags in such high esteem!

8 posted on 01/16/2006 7:53:23 AM PST by TheGeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
"...befuddled, toothless gasbags."

That's about it.

9 posted on 01/16/2006 7:55:37 AM PST by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Chuck Schumer reclines on the couch in his office on Capitol Hill, his stockinged feet propped up on the coffee table, a carton of takeout Chinese food perched precariously on his belly.



Please...what a disgusting scenario. On the other hand....

Thank God George W. Bush is such a fine example of fitness and strength.


10 posted on 01/16/2006 7:58:06 AM PST by cubreporter (I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than anyone will ever know. He's A++)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

“He has the smarts, he has the staff, he has the legal background,” says one former Senate staffer. “But he’s more worried about how he looks than if he’s going to win, and he’s more concerned about how he sounds than if he makes his point.”



......and this is coming from an ex-staffer?

My universal translator printed that bit of BeltwaySpeak as........."Phony as a three-dollar bill"


11 posted on 01/16/2006 7:58:36 AM PST by Unrepentant VN Vet (I can't really accept a welcome home until the last MIA does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
"Leahy will have to step aside for some reason or other..and Schumer moved up to ranking member."

"Klose but no cigar" as BJKlinton would say.

Schmuckie is going to be the NEXT Minority Leader (Hairy Weed is going to step aside to give him more time to focus and "disprove" the Abramoff alegations levied against him.

12 posted on 01/16/2006 8:10:15 AM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: harpu

No....Schumer will never become minority leader..My next door neighbor will not allow it..and BTW..bookmark my comment...Leahy's performance was abysmal..he has got to go...after the confirmation vote youi'll hear a lot of calls for him to step aside.


13 posted on 01/16/2006 8:18:42 AM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: harpu

I couldn't tell if the point of this article was to damn with faint praise or if it was a sarcastic piece. Either way Chuckie doesn't come off looking too good in my view.


14 posted on 01/16/2006 8:20:40 AM PST by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Hildabeast wants the Judiciary Ranking Member seat, Schmuckie sees more green in the Minority/[and his hopefully]Majority seat.


15 posted on 01/16/2006 8:24:01 AM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Wrong..there is nothing to gain from the SJC seat..only would cause her problems..


16 posted on 01/16/2006 8:25:15 AM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Like buttholes...we all our own [opinion]. I'm sorry you're too close to the forest the see the dung in the path.


17 posted on 01/16/2006 8:28:45 AM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: harpu
ooops..."we all our own" = "we all have our own"
18 posted on 01/16/2006 8:29:57 AM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
What I found to be quite amazing was the first day. Just before Alito gave his introduction speech, he had this kinda frightened look on his face. Three of the rat senators were crouched together, after Alito finished, whispering among themselves. They read Alito to be easily knocked off with their bullying. They felt he'd be a slam dunk.

To their surprise, Alito was totally different in his stance the next day. They were unable to fluster him, he answered more questions than previous nominees. His answers were totally proper. They were looking for one thing, however, Alito gave them over and over again his judicial philosophy...which was exactly what he should have done.

So all their planning in getting him...none of it worked...LOL

19 posted on 01/16/2006 8:30:10 AM PST by shield (The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Indeed, for Schumer, the Alito hearings marked yet another step in his improbable political ascent: from New York’s favorite schlepper senator to national Democratic macher. Not even two years ago, people wondered if Schumer would run for governor. Now you watch him and wonder why he ever even considered it. See Chuck whisper in the ear of Minority Leader Harry Reid. See Chuck take over the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee—and with a zap of his manic energy and pragmatism help make it borderline plausible that the party might retake the Senate in this year’s midterm elections. Mention to Chuck that 2005 was an excellent year for him—and listen to him crow.

What is the author smoking?

20 posted on 01/16/2006 8:38:22 AM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson