Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Many in Washington Oppose Same-Sex Marriage
Angus Reid ^ | 1/15/06

Posted on 01/14/2006 9:24:24 PM PST by LdSentinal

Angus Reid Global Scan) – Many adults in the Evergreen State reject changing the definition of marriage, according to a poll by SurveyUSA. 62 per cent of respondents in Washington believe marriage is a union between one man and one woman, while 34 per cent think it is a union between two adults, regardless of gender.

During the January 2004 State of the Union address, United States president George W. Bush said, "Activist judges (...) have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives."

In 2004, marriage certificates were issued to same-sex couples by local governments in the states of California, Oregon, New Mexico and New York. In May 2004, the state of Massachusetts allowed gay and lesbian partners to apply for marriage licenses, the first state-sanctioned homosexual weddings in the U.S.

Civil unions—currently available in the states of Vermont and Connecticut—give same-sex partners the same legal rights of married couples such as inheritance, insurance and hospital visiting privileges. A California law grants domestic partners the same legal rights of married couples, with the exception of filing joint income tax returns.

Over the past two years, 19 American states have enacted amendments to define marriage as the union between a man and a woman. Four more will hold votes on the matter this year.

The Supreme Court of Washington is expected to rule on the constitutionality of a same-sex marriage ban. In August 2004, King County Superior Court judge William Downing said that the state’s Constitution guarantees basic rights to homosexual persons, which would be violated is they are forbidden from marrying.

Polling Data

Do you think marriage should be defined as a union between one man and one woman? Or do you think it should be between two adults, regardless of gender?

Union between one man and one woman 62%

Union between two adults, regardless of gender 34%

Not sure 4%

Source: SurveyUSA / KING-TV Methodology: Telephone interviews with 500 Washington adults, conducted on Jan. 10, 2006. Margin of error is 4.5 per cent.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: garmarriage; gays; homosexualagenda; marriageamendment; poll; samesexmarriage; surveyusa; vote; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 01/14/2006 9:24:29 PM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

ping....


2 posted on 01/14/2006 9:29:13 PM PST by goodnesswins (Here in the Seattle area.....It's time to build Arks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Many adults in the Evergreen State reject changing the definition of marriage

And the press finds this a newsworthy item ?
3 posted on 01/14/2006 9:31:49 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
This is interesting. There is an article in San Jose Mercury News that says 50% of the people are OK with homosexual marriage (do not believe it). And get this that the Bareback Mountain movie is a pivotal point in this debate. They also state that this movie is sold out in all the theaters it is playing in. Most of the viewer are heterosexual dating couples, and that this movie is a chick flick (what?). This movie according to this article is a brilliant love story.
gag .... ok off the track I guess.
4 posted on 01/14/2006 9:31:50 PM PST by svcw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
When a leftist cause is supported at 50.00001% it's an "overwhelming majority" but when it's 62% against a leftist agenda we hear "many".

 

5 posted on 01/14/2006 9:32:57 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny (Base. All Yours = Mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw
They also state that this movie is sold out in all the theaters it is playing in. Most of the viewer are heterosexual dating couples, and that this movie is a chick flick (what?).

In the TV ads for the movie I have seen, the ads show the cowboys touching horses, guns and women and not each other.

Maybe those heterosexual couples were expecting something else.

6 posted on 01/14/2006 9:50:58 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

62% of Washington voters reject gay marriage. No problem for the Far Left. The Extreme Leftists in Seattle will find enough votes to support gay marriage like they did for the current Governor.


7 posted on 01/14/2006 9:51:42 PM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

That is the same feeling I got having seeing the ads. Don't they show one of the guys getting married with some kids. My husband says that you would never guess its a movie about homosexual sex.


8 posted on 01/14/2006 10:04:46 PM PST by svcw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Yes. They keep hollering "Romantic" with handsome 'cowboys' frolicking with their wives or playing with their kids.

Nothing about what the movie is really about.


9 posted on 01/14/2006 10:08:00 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Can a referendum be placed on the November ballot?


10 posted on 01/14/2006 10:20:24 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (Sam Alito Deserves To Be Confirmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

later pingout. I should be getting to pinging tomorrow. This is dragging on way too long.

Even Washington. Oregon last year went 58% for real marriage.


11 posted on 01/15/2006 12:31:26 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

There are going to be fireworks in the Washington State Supreme Court in late Feb to early March. Gregoire will not be the governor of Washington at the end of the year. CJ Alexander won't be on the supreme court bench, either.


12 posted on 01/15/2006 12:55:47 AM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

"Many in Washington Oppose Same-Sex Marriage" ... and somehow this is supossed to mean what, that the democrats in their legislature WON'T ram it down the peoples throats?
Please, this is Washington the land of crooked rats.


13 posted on 01/15/2006 4:14:19 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (We will never murtha to the terrorists. Bring home the troops means bring home the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
In the TV ads for the movie I have seen,

Two thoughts come to mind here. First, I've been lucky enough not to have seen any ads for the movie at all. Second, they're using these traditionally male symbols to "normalize" homosexuality. Anything for the "cause".

14 posted on 01/15/2006 4:17:56 AM PST by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Far from being encouraged about the poll results, I find the 34% in favor of defining marriage between any two people very troubling. It is a symptom of a depraved society, even in a state like WA. I've recently read that even Pres. Bush is in favor of some sort of domestic partnership arrangements, although he opposes same-sex marriage. By any other name, it is marriage and an official endorsement by the state of the slide into full-blown recognition of this counterfeit marriage.

Enough hand wringing. Now somebody cheer me up.


15 posted on 01/15/2006 6:53:11 AM PST by fwdude (The worst advice you can give some people is "Be yourself")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertina; paulat; Jack Black; Salmonslayer; elder5; Checkers; Brian Allen; lkco; phantomworker; ...
Thanks to goodnesswins for the ping. (All, be advised that from 1/18 through 1/25, due to travel and business, I will be on FR at best quite infrequently; pings may be delayed by days.)


Evergreen State ping

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.

Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.

16 posted on 01/15/2006 5:34:22 PM PST by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Libs: Celebrate MY diversity! | Iran Azadi 2006 | Is it February yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots

HUH? WHY?


17 posted on 01/15/2006 5:36:28 PM PST by goodnesswins (Here in the Seattle area.....It's time to build Arks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

Not a surprise. Like in most other so-called Blue States, it gets redder and redder the further you move away from the coast. Problem is, there are enough people in those big coastal cities to render the others' votes moot in statewide and national elections.


18 posted on 01/15/2006 5:40:03 PM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
"There are going to be fireworks in the Washington State Supreme Court in late Feb to early March."

connectthedots, are you getting closer to bringing them all down? It has been quite awhile I know that you have been working on your case.

19 posted on 01/15/2006 6:07:44 PM PST by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
I'll post my appellants brief on my petition to recall Christine Gregoire on Wednesday. should have the hearing in the state supreme court sometime in February.

The judicial corruption in the State of Washington will be laid out for all who are willing to open their eyes. some of the justices will try to do everything they can to avoid conducting oral arguments which would be broadcast on TVW. I will not be denied.

Gregoire is going down. It is a shame that AG McKenna is attempting to continue to cover up the corruption of Gregoire and the within the judiciary of Washington state.
20 posted on 01/15/2006 8:00:54 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson