Posted on 01/14/2006 7:08:01 AM PST by Peach
You can read the full Prospect article on Kennedy's site. Its subject is a lawsuit by a female Princeton student who wanted to be admitted to an all-male eating club at the university. As the title suggests, it argues more broadly that elitism isn't a bad thing. The article is written in an arch style that doesn't do much for me, and I don't think it's very good. But there isn't anything especially offensive or even controversial in it.
Dinesh D'Souza was the editor of Prospect at the time, and he confirms that the article, by H. W. Crocker III, now an editor for Regnery Books, was a satire:
The essay may not have been funny, D'Souza acknowledges, but Kennedy read from it as if it had been serious instead of an attempt at humor. "I think left-wing groups have been feeding Senator Kennedy snippets and he has been mindlessly reciting them," D'Souza said. "It was a satire."
The bottom line is that if this is the most "offensive" article CAP was responsible for in its decade-plus of existence, the Democrats' whole guilt-by-association effort was much ado about nothing. If being associated, however remotely, with attempts at humor that don't turn out to be very funny is enough to place a public figure beyond the pale, the Democrats had better stay away from Al Franken.
Late in the afternoon Lindsey Graham puckishly engaged in what for all the world sounded like a, well, filibuster, whose effect was to drive Sen. Schumer's turn to the exact stroke of 6, when every cable network switched to news programming. Alone now on C-Span, Sen. Schumer rode the thin reed of the 1985 job résumé. Going nowhere, he told an odd mother-in-law story, which Judge Alito mistook for a question: "Senator, I think--." Sen. Schumer cut him off: "--Just let me move on."
They're all half nuts.
They could read it but wouldn't get the satire.
Didn't another senator use satire not too long ago...my mind is blank? We need to start a list of all the incidents where libs use satire to support their arguments.
I believe he spoke of it being satire on Friday.
Kennedy admitted on Friday the piece was satire?
Should forward "The Best of ScrappleFace.com" to Kennedy's office.
As Leno mentioned the other night, that's the equivalent of O.J. Simpson naming his dog "Slash."
Yeah, I know :-)
Oh, Rush spoke about the piece being satire on Friday. My mistake. Did he know it was satire or suspect it?
Do you have e-mail addresses for the Senate Judiciary Committee members or do we have to go, one by one, through their home pages and send e-mails?
You know, on second thought -- I'm calling their staffers on Tuesday (Monday is MLK holiday). Their staffers will make sure they get the message.
I'm going to make a guess that the Republicans will raise an issue and ask that he be placed on another committee of some type. The fact that he (or his staff) would draw a satire piece to place as serious material in front of a national audience...leaves his credibility to be in shreds. I can't see the guy being trusted by the national media again when you talk about federal court judges. And as for his personal staff...the guy who got this piece...probably was a dim as they come...did no investigation work...and was a easy target for bloggers to kick. Every single one of these Democratic senators need to review their staffs...and lay off the folks who can't perform.
As long as (a) he's stealing oxygen, and (b) he can funnel billions of federal dollars into Massachussets.
Big Dig, anyone?
I didn't hear it..someone posted that he did call it satire..
No-one seeks to exonerate Kennedy, but rather, to attribute the practice of "mindlessly reading" left-wing material to a wider class of mental midgets. FReegards...
"Time to write something for Teddy!"
Something like an obit?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.