Posted on 01/13/2006 5:38:54 AM PST by OXENinFLA
5th & Final Day of Hearings
This morning, the Senate Judiciary Cmte. convenes for a final session in the nomination hearings of Judge Samuel Alito. Outside witnesses who did not testify at yes- terday's hearings are given an opportunity to offer their opinions on the nominee. The Cmte. meets again to vote, either to approve or reject, on Tues., Jan. 17
FRI., 9:00AM ET, C-SPAN
Live Links
Because they have been looking for a way to get rid of Bush since 2000....and they see this as a way to get the American people to start seeing things their way...
Question: IF the NYTimes article re: NSA wiretapping had NOT come out....what would they be talking about???
Tribe's statement marks "an important moment" in legal scholarship, Yale's Balkin says, because of Tribe's status as the leading symbol of liberal constitutional interpretation
http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:zXUWdTPRaz0J:www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp%3Fid%3D1117011910589+larry+tribe&hl=en
Thanks. Teddy time!
here we go, he's whining about "urintary executive".
Tribe actually stated that if there is a Justice Alito, that liberties will be taken away.
"OMG....is Kennedy actually sober?!"
*hick!*
You mean The Bloated Bloviator of BlueBlood Blarney.
LOL! Good one!
My cat has a urinary infection.
Oh Gee .. Another question about President Bush
You know, I've always wondered how Kennedy (who has no honor) has the nerve to question anyone else's honor and fitness for anything. Here's a man (Kennedy) who was too cowardly to save a woman from drowning because of his act of stupidity and he has the b@lls to question someone else's integrity.
Larry Tribe on Spying: A Grave Abuse
Calls Legal Justifications "Poppycock"
I announce a January 20 Democratic Hearing on this abuse of power
http://www.conyersblog.us/archives/00000348.htm
Sounds like Professor Tribe, no?
I'd fill in the blank with "colon."
*rolls eyes* Of course they will. Because, as we all know, Republicans are racist, sexist, bigot, homophobes.
/sarcasm
Tribe would be on any 'rat President's short list for SCOTUS.
"IF the NYTimes article re: NSA wiretapping had NOT come out....what would they be talking about???"
We would still be talking about the wrong war for the wrong reasons at the wrong time.
SCHUMER: Let's just assume that it was found that the president's right to wiretap people, the way we're discussing it now in terms of the recent NSA revelations, was found constitutional. Would there be a different standard if, say, the president -- does that necessarily allow the president to then go ahead and go into people's homes here in America, American citizens, without a warrant?Does the one necessarily lead to the other?
ALITO: No. Authority to wiretap without a warrant does not necessarily lead to physical entry onto private property without a warrant.
Alito's answer was better, because it explained a broader range of possible circumstances.
If it has, she obviously found some industrial strength solvent of some kind.
caught up.. forgot to get on ping list and wasn't in breaking news. ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.