Posted on 01/13/2006 5:10:13 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
by Mark Finkelstein
January 13, 2006 - 07:53
Discussing the Alito hearings on this morning's Today show, Matt Lauer and Tim Russert sounded less like host and analyst and more like two teenaged boys, griping as they exit the theater that the movie didn't deliver enough exploding cars and train wrecks.
Lauer's opening question sounded a theatrical theme: "did the event live up to its billing?"
Russert panned the performance's lack of fireworks: "It sure didn't, Matt. People talked about a confrontation. It certainly wasn't that. It started off with a bang and ended with a whimper."
But to the extent things did get nasty, who was responsible? Lauer slyly suggested that it was . . . Alito's own fault.
LauerL: "As he started to frustrate Democrats, Tim, it appeared to me that they then moved into more personal issues like that alumni group at Princeton and his failure to recuse himself from a case involving a company with which he had investments."
Get it? Is was frustration at Alito's intransigence that drove those Democrat pussycats into attacking Alito. Matt stopped just short of claiming that the Devil made Teddy do it. Lauer then asked Russert whether the personal attacks were "the wrong direction for Democrats to go?"
That's when Russert lamented the Dems' lack of the materiel of political war:
"It would've been helpful if there had been more ammunition. If there in fact had been something there they could directly link Judge Alito to."
We feel your pain, Tim.
In the set-up segment, Pete Williams noted the unprecedented move in which a bi-partisan panel of current and former judicial colleagues testified in support of Alito. He ran a clip of black former federal judge Timothy Lewis saying he wouldn't be sitting there if he thought Alito "might be hostile to civil rights."
On the other side, we were treated to footage of law professor Goodwin Liu who claimed that an analysis of Alito's judicial decisions "shows a clear anti-civil rights pattern."
Which raises the question, who is Liu?
As can be seen from his official faculty bio, Liu is a professor at Berkeley, a former law clerk to Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and a project director at something called the Earl Warren Institute for Race, Ethnicity, and Diversity. His main current interest is using the 14th amendment to federalize education. Oh, and just for good measure, in 2003 he co-authored an article in the Georgetown Law Journal with . . . Hillary Rodham Clinton.
So, bi-partisan panel of judges vs. professional Democrat who wants to reinterpret the Constitution to vastly expand the scope of the federal government. You be the judge.
Didn't Bubba used to have a speechwriter named Eric Liu? Wonder if he's any relation?
"I caught a couple of minutes. Long enough to hear Timmy try to blame the Pubbies for making Mrs. Alito cry"
I saw that, too, and could not believe my ears. Russert is pathetic.
Timmy's reputation has gone right down a rat hole. Hope it's been worth it, Timmy.
"It would've been helpful if there had been more ammunition. If there in fact had been something there they could directly link Judge Alito to."
Talk about sour grapes. Democratic Party is soooo depressed this morning. New mantra - system broke, why didn't we have more ammo (ie. mud to sling), damn these Republicans, they keep nominating quality Judges, how dare they!!!!!!!
LOL.
Remember the fabulous scene when Meg Ryan faked the orgasm at the diner in "When Harry Met Sally"?
After she was done the older female customer at the next table was asked by the waitress what she wanted. She said, "I'll have what she's having!"
ROFL!
Yes, I do. Please see #29!
Yup, it can now be revealed that it was the same compound that GOP operatives secretly slipped into Ed Muskie's eyes way back when in Maine, forcing him to cry and ultimately drop out of the race.
Thank you for reminding me once again why I do not watch network TV (except for football, when necessary).
My tagline says it all ;-)
;-)
Meg's a bit bland for my taste, though she actually seems to have improved with age. Give me CZ-J!
pant...........
BTW, he represents a state so small and comes from such a large family, that it is entirely possible he is elected by his relatives. It's the family's idea of custodial care to keep Joe in DC. THey use the Senate as kind of a Senior Day Care thing. It's not heartless, they can check up on him when he's on TV.
LOL!
And we do appreciate it!
The Dems like to project, as the shrinks would say. They figure that anyone who has gotten this far must be corrupt in one way or another because that would be true for them. The failure of the Committee to unearth this corruption is because they can't find it, not because it doesn't exist.
They do not even get how when they have already polluted the well. . .their musings sound like the final poison being dropped in.
These people are who they are. . .what they are; and save for the most brain-dead leftist idealogue who finds this garbage analysis impressive and worthy. . .they are recognized as scum, by most observers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.